• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Question re Jay EE
lescalja
29-07-2015
I must have missed something. How come Jay was arrested for the mugging, but Ben has been released? Did Phil tell Marsden that they were both involved, and if so , has Ben been charged with the mugging also?
Louise_
29-07-2015
That''s what I want to know too!
Adrian_Ward1
29-07-2015
Very strange .
Superstar99
29-07-2015
I can only assume that having already been questioned in relation to the robbery at the off licence and the fact they now know he was on that bus with Lucy the night she died, they have enough evidence with his prints being on Lucy's belongings to charge him.

Not sure why Ben is not charged though because as you say he was with Jay the night they robbed the off licence. What hasn't been clarified is which robbery he is charged with, I assumed it was the off licence.
0...0
29-07-2015
Good point!
lescalja
30-07-2015
Thanks for replies... I guess I'll just need to keep watching to find out. It just puzzled me, as I thought I must have missed something
MiniMeToo
30-07-2015
Originally Posted by lescalja:
“I must have missed something. How come Jay was arrested for the mugging, but Ben has been released? Did Phil tell Marsden that they were both involved, and if so , has Ben been charged with the mugging also?”

Ben was probably charged as well, but because it was just theft he would be let out on bail until a trial, Jay has to be charged for it as well and will also be let out on bail until a trial..
joe gillott
30-07-2015
Ben should still be in custody for the robbery. Indint get why jay was arrested for that but not ben
Harlowe
30-07-2015
I'm not sure either the previous episode Marsden said they need to speak to Jay nothing about arresting him for robbery and Ben I presume has been bailed until charges are brought but what evidence do they have on Jay, Ben hasn't said anything about him being involved as far as we know and the guy who ID Ben only mentioned him and no mentioned of a second person DNA beeing found because Jane's would be over it as well!
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map