Originally Posted by call100:
“It may be that you need to accept that people have different views....
My opinions (virtually all negative) are based on having the box from first release.
If someone bought it as their first PVR, they wouldn't know how bad the UI is and maybe would accept it as a good box.
However, given that the PVR should now be a nice mature well set up piece of machinery with an excellent UI based on the best bits from all previous PVR's, this fails.
What exactly is quicker than the Fox T2? I may have missed something....The other things you mention that are lacking are also deal breakers...”
“It may be that you need to accept that people have different views....
My opinions (virtually all negative) are based on having the box from first release.
If someone bought it as their first PVR, they wouldn't know how bad the UI is and maybe would accept it as a good box.
However, given that the PVR should now be a nice mature well set up piece of machinery with an excellent UI based on the best bits from all previous PVR's, this fails.
What exactly is quicker than the Fox T2? I may have missed something....The other things you mention that are lacking are also deal breakers...”
That's how I feel too. I've had so many pvrs and I don't feel technology has moved on much with any of them tbh. I loved my old Inverto and Digifusion units and I bet people still love their Topfields compared to what's on offer now.
I think having af123 and his brilliant custom firmware has left me a bit spoiled and I want a pvr as good or better than that, but I don't think that's going to happen.




). 

