• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 65)
<<
<
375 of 425
>>
>
Servalan
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“It still can't get close to 5m even with only 4m watching ITV? Gaaaaaaaaah. At the risk of sounding like HODV w/r Stuart Blackburn, something has to happen to turn this ship around before the damage is terminal. As of this year Moffat's been at the helm for as long as RTD was, I'm sure nobody would mind if he were to quietly step aside... ”

Moffat's ego doesn't appear to include self-awareness, so I doubt he'll go because of the ratings.

And the BBC won't show him the door, as he's too important a talent to have onside (see: Sherlock).

The show will be off-air next year anyway (the golden opportunity ITV are failing dismally to exploit), but I'd guess the 2017 series may be Moffat's swan song. Which leaves the question: who takes over?
Score
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Both Ross and (in previous weeks) Keyhole doing very badly, posting figures beginning with a 1. Was X Factor support more crucial than we thought?

Keyhole's fall was steeper - Ross has been struggling for a while.”

Perhaps so, although it seems the rugby lead-in was especially low and incompatible. Only 2m or so we're watching at the end of the coverage and it's quite telling that despite the late slot Ross actually grew over the show (whereas out of XF he drops quite a way):

22:15 - 1.64m (10.1%)
22:30 - 1.77m (11.6%)
22:45 - 1.87m (13.0%)
23:00 - 1.89m (15.0%)
Fudd
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Strictly certainly knocked a bit between 6.30 and 7.00-seems people do turn up fashionably late .And a bit of a surge for the Rugby at 8.15.

Wouldn't want to start Strictly any earlier.”

There's no reason why it can't. The BBC shouldn't be as obsessed with overnights as the commercial networks are. Besides, a later Strictly means Doctor Who runs ridiculously late. It's a family show, supposedly - running past 9pm is ludicrous. I know it looks like I'm contradicting myself but there's a difference between putting a show in a slot where it will still work perfectly well and shoving it later resulting in a show struggling more than it should because of it.

Of course the perfect solution would be to move Who before Strictly and have the latter airing from around 7pm but due to the filmed results that wouldn't be possible. Because of that maybe the BBC should look to move Doctor Who to the winter on it's return in 2017 rather than leaving it airing in a very late slot in the schedule across the autumn?
NeilVW
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Maybe so, and I cant say I understand the Maths of profit for ITV, but there cant be many of anything in his rating last night.”

We can do some back-of-the-envelope figures. Thanks to rzt we have the demo breakdown of Jonathan Ross's show at 21:20 on Saturday 14 February 2015, which rated 2.17m exc +1:

http://postimg.org/image/66cuzuo71/full/
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=6770

and also typical ad rates for ITV back in 2011:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=3054

Let's assume that the demos are still the same as in February, that ITV ran a full complement of ads during Ross last night (21 x 30-second spots), and that ad rates are up +10% since 2011 (all guesswork on my part, happy for people to correct these). I've also assumed the breaks rated -10% lower than the overall programme average.

That would mean the ad revenue for Ross last night, rating 1.78m inc +1, would be:

- £366,361 if sold on ABC1 Adults
[i.e. £19.80 per 1000 viewers (rate) x 55% skew x 1.78m x 90% x 21 spots = £366,361]

- £279,767 if sold on 16-34s
[i.e. £46.20 per 1000 viewers (rate) x 18% skew x 1.78m x 90% x 21 spots = £279,767]

So on these estimates, it would make more sense to sell the show on ABC1 Adults than 16-34s. It still looks profitable on these figures. Costs for chat must be pretty low. (What's Ross's salary these days? )

NB: advertising ratings are actually worked out on consolidated viewing to the ads. However as 70%+ of ads are spun through on PVR, this should make little difference to the figures.
Last edited by NeilVW : 18-10-2015 at 11:21
Straker
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“Moffat's ego doesn't appear to include self-awareness, so I doubt he'll go because of the ratings.”

Cohen, Yentob, Thompson, Birt, RTD, Entwistle, Moffat..... A lack of self-awareness seems a prerequisite for undeservedly rising through the ranks at the Beeb.

Quote:
“And the BBC won't show him the door, as he's too important a talent to have onside (see: Sherlock).”

Sherlock is the only reason he's still on Dr Who. People haven't been able to say no to him, until now I reckon.....
Dancc
18-10-2015
One for KennyT...

Arne Dahl EP1: 0.57m (2.8%)
Arne Dahl EP2: 0.47m (2.9%)
Only_You
18-10-2015
BBC1's Christmas line up is looking pretty good!

Catherine Tate’s Nan (x2)
Stick Man
Sherlock
Professor Branestawm
Billionaire Boy
Would I Lie To You
Still Open All Hours
Doctor Who
Mrs Browns Boys (x2)
Pointless Celebrities
Call The Midwife
Shaun The Sheep
Not Going Out
Strictly Come Dancing

I just really hope they schedule them in the most effective way! Last years scheduling was, IMO, terrible.
Glenn A
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“There's no reason why it can't. The BBC shouldn't be as obsessed with overnights as the commercial networks are. Besides, a later Strictly means Doctor Who runs ridiculously late. It's a family show, supposedly - running past 9pm is ludicrous. I know it looks like I'm contradicting myself but there's a difference between putting a show in a slot where it will still work perfectly well and shoving it later resulting in a show struggling more than it should because of it.

Of course the perfect solution would be to move Who before Strictly and have the latter airing from around 7pm but due to the filmed results that wouldn't be possible. Because of that maybe the BBC should look to move Doctor Who to the winter on it's return in 2017 rather than leaving it airing in a very late slot in the schedule across the autumn?”

The best solution for Dr Who would be to go back to 7.00 in the spring in a slot where ITV usually have YBF. These later showings and stiff competition from ITV aren't working, as TXF will be back next week and for all it's not the force it was, still attracts 7 million viewers.
Straker
18-10-2015
That first Nan special was one of the most appalling comedies I've ever seen and I'm a Tate fan (not in Dr Who...) and thought the Nan sketches in her own show were often the highlight. Makes total BBCSense that they would commission more of something that was utterly wretched.

Sherlock's now the only thing in that list I'm remotely interested in.
Zac Quinn
18-10-2015
Interesting article on DW ratings by Neil Midgley of Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/neilmidg...ont-cancel-it/

Agree with most of it, but not the last part. The one thing they don't need to do right now is make the public immune to regenerations by sacking off Peter Capaldi already.
Fudd
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“Interesting article on DW ratings by Neil Midgley of Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/neilmidg...ont-cancel-it/

Agree with most of it, but not the last part. The one thing they don't need to do right now is make the public immune to regenerations by sacking off Peter Capaldi already.”

I do think they've made the public immune to death within the show though. It started way back in series two when Rose spoke about this being the story of her death when she didn't die at all and it has just escalated. Even Danny Pink was given a get out clause, even though he went elsewhere. It's killing the potential drama in the episode as level of risk is declining - oh so someone's in trouble? Even if they die they'll come back some how...
Chris1964
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“There's no reason why it can't. The BBC shouldn't be as obsessed with overnights as the commercial networks are. Besides, a later Strictly means Doctor Who runs ridiculously late. It's a family show, supposedly - running past 9pm is ludicrous. I know it looks like I'm contradicting myself but there's a difference between putting a show in a slot where it will still work perfectly well and shoving it later resulting in a show struggling more than it should because of it.

Of course the perfect solution would be to move Who before Strictly and have the latter airing from around 7pm but due to the filmed results that wouldn't be possible. Because of that maybe the BBC should look to move Doctor Who to the winter on it's return in 2017 rather than leaving it airing in a very late slot in the schedule across the autumn?”

I think there were a couple of 6.20 starts? I don't think though this was anything other than the scheduling constraints or the England inspired strength of the Rugby. I reckon the BBC want to push Strictly as far as they can to the absolute maximum they can. To be honest I don't blame them. Its their biggest entertainment brand and if its agreed that it should exist in the first place, I don't see the point in then not trying to show it to the biggest audience possible. Iv never understood the argument of where people dance within the show either. At the end of the day, if the cast and crew are doing their creative best, and licence fee payers money is being used to make the show as perfect as possible the argument of then holding back a bit because opposition might be hit too hard is a confused one imo.

I don't think Dr Who would get a bigger audience at 6/7/8 or 9 to be honest. I don't know the breakdown of the audience make up but I would imagine it was far more family friendly under RTD than it has become now.
Straker
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“Interesting article on DW ratings by Neil Midgley of Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/neilmidg...ont-cancel-it/

Agree with most of it, but not the last part. The one thing they don't need to do right now is make the public immune to regenerations by sacking off Peter Capaldi already.”

Good to see the shitty music getting rightly criticised but seeing as Moff and Gold continue to delude themselves thinking they can best Derbyshire's arrangement it's no surprise the music continues to devolve yearly.

Eccelston effectively sacked himself even before the show came back so I don't see Capaldi leaving as a bad thing for the public. Indeed, it'll be a necessary declaration of intent if there's to be a new broom for 2017 as most viewers could care less if there's a new production team or not.

They never learn though, the BBC, allowing these middle-aged men to treat the show like it's their own personal plaything and in the process losing all sight of how bad it's become as they're forced to belligerently defend it come what may.
Zac Quinn
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Only_You:
“BBC1's Christmas line up is looking pretty good!

Catherine Tate’s Nan (x2)
Stick Man
Sherlock
Professor Branestawm
Billionaire Boy
Would I Lie To You
Still Open All Hours
Doctor Who
Mrs Browns Boys (x2)
Pointless Celebrities
Call The Midwife
Shaun The Sheep
Not Going Out
Strictly Come Dancing

I just really hope they schedule them in the most effective way! Last years scheduling was, IMO, terrible.”

Hmm. Excluding shows that haven't been on before, daytime shows which are naff even if popular, shows for kids, period dramas that always bomb at Christmas, shows that bombed on their last outings, and a show about time-travel which is currently in crisis, there's only five items left on that list. Hopefully they'll have some good films.
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“I do think they've made the public immune to death within the show though. It started way back in series two when Rose spoke about this being the story of her death when she didn't die at all and it has just escalated. Even Danny Pink was given a get out clause, even though he went elsewhere. It's killing the potential drama in the episode as level of risk is declining - oh so someone's in trouble? Even if they die they'll come back some how...”

Now you mention it, that seems to be a pattern across Moffat shows..
Straker
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“I do think they've made the public immune to death within the show though. It started way back in series two when Rose spoke about this being the story of her death when she didn't die at all and it has just escalated. Even Danny Pink was given a get out clause, even though he went elsewhere. It's killing the potential drama in the episode as level of risk is declining - oh so someone's in trouble? Even if they die they'll come back some how...”

What they did to the The Brig was unforgiveable. It speaks volumes about Moffat that he thought turning the character into a Cyberman was a fitting (overdue) tribute to Nicholas Courtney, the beloved actor who'd portrayed Lethbridge-Stewart across decades.
Chris1964
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“We can do some back-of-the-envelope figures. Thanks to rzt we have the demo breakdown of Jonathan Ross's show at 21:20 on Saturday 14 February 2015, which rated 2.17m exc +1:

http://postimg.org/image/66cuzuo71/full/
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=6770

and also typical ad rates for ITV back in 2011:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=3054

Let's assume that the demos are still the same as in February, that ITV ran a full complement of ads during Ross last night (21 x 30-second spots), and that ad rates are up +10% since 2011 (all guesswork on my part, happy for people to correct these). I've also assumed the breaks rated -10% lower than the overall programme average.

That would mean the ad revenue for Ross last night, rating 1.78m inc +1, would be:

- £366,361 if sold on ABC1 Adults
[i.e. £19.80 per 1000 viewers (rate) x 55% skew x 1.78m x 90% x 21 spots = £366,361]

- £279,767 if sold on 16-34s
[i.e. £46.20 per 1000 viewers (rate) x 18% skew x 1.78m x 90% x 21 spots = £279,767]

So on these estimates, it would make more sense to sell the show on ABC1 Adults than 16-34s. It still looks profitable on these figures. Costs for chat must be pretty low. (What's Ross's salary these days? )

NB: advertising ratings are actually worked out on consolidated viewing to the ads. However as 70%+ of ads are spun through on PVR, this should make little difference to the figures.”

Thank you for this. I would take my hat off to you but the only hat I own is Cricket cap with Brian Lara written on it from 1994 and its in the loft. So I cant

I am glad you added the conclusion statement-helps people like me . Thanks for the taking the time with the maths though.
stv viewer
18-10-2015
I think BBC 1's christmas line up will air like this

Catherine Tate’s Nan (x2) - 1 ep around xmas and other ep at new years
Stick Man - boxing day
Sherlock - xmas eve,day or boxing day
Professor Branestawm - xmas eve or boxing day
Billionaire Boy - boxing day
Would I Lie To You - week leading up to christmas
Still Open All Hours - xmas day or boxing day
Doctor Who - xmas day
Mrs Browns Boys (x2) - xmas day and new years day
Pointless Celebrities - week leading up to christmas or possibly before strictly final
Call The Midwife - xmas day or boxing day
Shaun The Sheep - xmas day or boxing day
Not Going Out - week leading up to christmas or days after
Strictly Come Dancing - xmas day
AcerBen
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Straker:
“That first Nan special was one of the most appalling comedies I've ever seen and I'm a Tate fan (not in Dr Who...) and thought the Nan sketches in her own show were often the highlight. Makes total BBCSense that they would commission more of something that was utterly wretched.

Sherlock's now the only thing in that list I'm remotely interested in.”

You must've been in a bad mood that day. The Nan special was very funny!
Straker
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by AcerBen:
“The Nan special was very funny!”

Except it wasn't. If it didn't work for an existing fan then it didn't work at all.
Oliver_Tomlinso
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Except it wasn't. If it didn't work for an existing fan then it didn't work at all.”

For you maybe, I'm an existing fan and whilst I didn't find it as funny as previous sketches I enjoyed it...
Cestrian18
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Except it wasn't. If it didn't work for an existing fan then it didn't work at all.”

Sorry but that's wrong, I enjoyed it,and it had a fairly positive show thread at the time if I remember- To say it didn't work at all is an over exaggeration
Straker
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Oliver_Tomlinso:
“For you maybe, I'm an existing fan and whilst I didn't find it as funny as previous sketches I enjoyed it...”

Originally Posted by Cestrian18:
“Sorry but that's wrong, I enjoyed it,and it had a fairly positive show thread at the time if I remember- To say it didn't work at all is an over exaggeration”

So very good that it took them 6 years to make more. Yeah, a resounding success.

Further evidence of the poverty of imagination at the BBC.
hyperstarsponge
18-10-2015
I don't think people are watching TV outside SCD on Saturday night any more, Apart from the subtitled BBC4 viewers at 21:00 which may soon get higher ratings then Doctor Who
BillKay
18-10-2015
Originally Posted by Straker:
“So very good that it took them 6 years to make more. Yeah, a resounding success.

Further evidence of the poverty of imagination at the BBC.”

I'm another Tate fan and really enjoyed the Nan special, so I think it's just one person's opinion. In fact I refuse to delete its recording off my PVR and have watched it many times.

I didn't know until now that there will be two further Nan Xmas specials - can't wait
Straker
18-10-2015
If it rated well and was well received by audiences why no more until now? Is Tate hard-up because the BBC certainly are, for ideas it would seem if going back to 2009 for something that passed without much of a ripple then (massive THREE page thread here) is the best they can come up with at Xmas.
<<
<
375 of 425
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map