I understand what DTC is trying to do but he needs to make things clearer. A lot of stuff are said but not resolved.
1) The Hubbards. I like them. They are a good addition to the show but they've not made it clear. How exactly does Vincent know Ronnie? Does he know her through Phil and Grant or by coincidence? If it is simply by coincidence then it won't work. How exactly did their fling last? Did they know each other from years back in Ibiza (and if so how come he doesn't know Roxy) or was it that briefly in autumn 2013? And if so, how come Ronnie was always in Walford? Who is Mr Hubbard Snr and how exactly does he know the Mitchells and Den Watts? Oh and what is Claudette's background with the Mitchells? Need clearer answers in order to understand properly what DTC is trying to do.
2) The Cokers. Do they have links to The Square too? I know Les slept with Pat Butcher in the 1960s and he did the funerals for all the characters but is there anymore?
3) Gavin Sullivan. He needs to make clear how Gavin knows people in Walford though I expect he'll do this. I suspect Gavin is Sharon's father but has links to The Square through Ted Hills, Pete Beale and Den Watts. DTC needs to make it clear that is the case if so.
4) Don't forget Dot. Will she literally remain in prison for the duration of her sentence or will she be released beforehand?

It's incredibly important that Dot remains locked up, for all of our sakes.

What are your plans for Cora now she is back on the Square?

When is Dot going to be released?

If Gavin is Sharon's Father does Kathy know?

Is Claudette actually moving onto the Square?

When will the Lucy Beale Murder case finally be resolved?

Hopefully we will get an interview for Autumn

When is the rape plot going to reach the end? Is Dean ever going to get any sort of punishment?

Never

When are you going to do a good storyline??

I do think dean will get his comeuppance. Even the actor has said it has to happen. He's signed a new 12 month contract but I think he'll leave after that.

Thing is with DTC he likes involve to many secrets, and either a let down or forgot about

When we met Donna she said she has brothers...I hope we're going to meet them.

Where is Mo.

Don't let Buster become Phil's doormat.

Free Dot Cotton.

Why did you ruin Charlie...he had so much potential.

Pam said that her killing Lawrie caused a bit of a scandal, but as no one in Walford seemed to know about it I think the Cokers didn't really have much to do with the residents of Albert Square until they moved premises. I think they lived on the other side of Waltord.

I am sure Gavin's history will be explored when he actually gets to Walford. Paul Nicholas is heavily involved in theatre until the middle of November so I doubt his appearances I'll be minimal until after then.

That is sadly inevitable.

Buster will be ruined beyond repair very shortly I fear.

If Reece, Shaw, Elias, Fusco, Root and all the rest from Person of Interest visited Walford they would all owned by Mr Cockroach within minutes.

I know its a shame I used to really like Buster, I'm liking him less and less lately

Bobby Beale killing Lucy
Kat's secret son
Afie's brain tumour secret
Les and Claudette's non-affair secret
Libby's secret about Chelsea
Babe's secret about Ramsgate (that Cora knows)
Truth about Linda's rape
Ronnie's secret about Carl White
Kathy Beale's fake death
Gavin Sullivan's links to the Square
Sharon's real dad
Vincent and Claudette's plan (and their links to the Mitchells which are yet to be explained)
Stacey's key
Stacey and Kush
Ronnie and Vincent's kiss


Bit too much IMO. He's a good storyteller but can go overboard.

Id like to know if he has any regrets having Dean rape Linda and obliterating the Carters

I would like to know if Kat is coming back to EE in 2016 or if the 'break' is permanent.

Also why he didn't see potential in Lola.

My questions would be:

When is Lauren due back?
Just how dark is Abi going to go psychologically?
Any thoughts on expanding the Mitchells with the returns of Courtney and Louise?
Do you personally see Jane as a victim in the Lucy storyline or as someone who's acted immorally?

Why not just send the questions directly to him? He is hardly likely to answer on here