• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Gadgets
  • Mobile Phones
what's happening with MBNL?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Zee_Bukhari
14-08-2015
Seems like the ex_orange masts being upgraded for Three customers has grinded to a halt.

No progress has been made in ages where EE customers get 3G coverage but Three customers don't I'm in London and this is still a major issue.

Does anyone has any info what's going on and why this seems to have gone in d to a halt?

Thx
d123
14-08-2015
EE seem to have decided on a policy of 2G/4G for a number of masts, as MBNL is 3G only these masts seem to be outside of MBNL, as are any other 4G improvements.

Some say EE aren't all that enthusiastic about MBNL since Hutchison decided to go after o2.
mupet0000
14-08-2015
I think the assumption is that because Three are buying out O2 (technically, Three's parent company are buying out O2), EE don't want to help Three since they are potentially going to be gaining access to the Cornerstone network.

MBNL is a 50/50 between Three/EE so I would've thought that Three still have some say in the site upgrades. But, I'm thinking that the remaining sites to be upgraded/integrated into MBNL are legacy Orange sites that are solely under EE's control, so if they just upgrade the 2G/4G, they can leave the site out of MBNL and not help Three seen as MBNL is only a 3G share.

If MBNL can't go and upgrade the remaining legacy Orange sites, all the can do is maintain the current network.
Zee_Bukhari
14-08-2015
But its a 50:50 joint agreement. Three must have power to do something about it
Zee_Bukhari
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by mupet0000:
“I think the assumption is that because Three are bu
ng out O2 (technically, Three's parent company are buying out O2), EE don't want to help Three since they are potentially going to be gaining access to the Cornerstone network.

MBNL is a 50/50 between Three/EE so I would've thought that Three still have some say in the site upgrades. But, I'm thinking that the remaining sites to be upgraded/integrated into MBNL are legacy Orange sites that are solely under EE's control, so if they just upgrade the 2G/4G, they can leave the site out of MBNL and not help Three seen as MBNL is only a 3G share.

If MBNL can't go and upgrade the remaining legacy Orange sites, all the can do is maintain the current network.”

There is an ex-orange mast upgraded about 1.5 years ago or longer with 2g 3g and 4g for EE customers but it doesn't allow Thee customers to connect. If its 3g upgraded surely Three customers should at least get access to this mast as its a blackspot in the area which Three are aware off.

EE is just acting unfair in this agreement.
d123
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by Zee_Bukhari:
“But its a 50:50 joint agreement. Three must have power to do something about it”

No, the owner network has to put the site into MBNL before MBNL can manage it, if the owner network decides not, it's just tough.
jaffboy151
14-08-2015
EE seem to have frozen any mbnl expansion indefinitely it seems, I wonder that if the o2 deal goes ahead weather EE have any freedom in the mbnl deal to halt further 4g upgrades from three on any T mobile sites,
clewsy
14-08-2015
Yes it does appear that EE have stopped improving the old 2g sites that are part of MBNL.

It also doesn't appear that many masts are going 2g/4g though, which isn't helping EE as VF/o2 are arriving in more places all the time.
clewsy
14-08-2015
Does anyone have the ability though to near enough confirm suspicions that roll out has stopped of bringing old 2g into 3g and 4g?
Thine Wonk
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by d123:
“No, the owner network has to put the site into MBNL before MBNL can manage it, if the owner network decides not, it's just tough.”

It is a joint venture with 50/50 ownership though. The plans are to continue the operation from what I've read. I think there's a lot of discussion going on industry wide about plans.
mupet0000
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by Thine Wonk:
“It is a joint venture with 50/50 ownership though. The plans are to continue the operation from what I've read. I think there's a lot of discussion going on industry wide about plans.”

Not with regards to legacy Orange sites, EE owns those and they are not part of MBNL unless EE brings them in. This is clear to see considering the 4G additions EE has made to many of these sites without bringing them into MBNL.
RAN Man
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by d123:
“No, the owner network has to put the site into MBNL before MBNL can manage it, if the owner network decides not, it's just tough.”

MBNL manage all of EEs sites, regardless of their status with Three. There is an agreed list of Orange stes, between Three and EE which will become shared, and the target and quantity for each year is agreed beforehand by EE and Three.

This perception that EE is slowing it down is simply not the case. If Three want in to any ex Orange site, they can do, if they're prepared to pay for it, and if its not on the already agreed list.
mupet0000
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by RAN Man:
“MBNL manage all of EEs sites, regardless of their status with Three. There is an agreed list of Orange stes, between Three and EE which will become shared, and the target and quantity for each year is agreed beforehand by EE and Three.

This perception that EE is slowing it down is simply not the case. If Three want in to any ex Orange site, they can do, if they're prepared to pay for it, and if its not on the already agreed list.”

If this is the case, why do EE go in and upgrade 2G sites to 4G and leave out 3G entirely? Surely it's in their best interest to add 3G too.
enapace
14-08-2015
Originally Posted by RAN Man:
“MBNL manage all of EEs sites, regardless of their status with Three. There is an agreed list of Orange stes, between Three and EE which will become shared, and the target and quantity for each year is agreed beforehand by EE and Three.

This perception that EE is slowing it down is simply not the case. If Three want in to any ex Orange site, they can do, if they're prepared to pay for it, and if its not on the already agreed list.”

You haven't got an approximate amount of Orange masts that still have to be integrated into MBNL do you?
RAN Man
15-08-2015
Originally Posted by mupet0000:
“If this is the case, why do EE go in and upgrade 2G sites to 4G and leave out 3G entirely? Surely it's in their best interest to add 3G too.”

If you have 2G and 4G what do you need 3G for?
clewsy
15-08-2015
Well because the MNLB share doesn't include 4g sites. That was what the MD of EE said in an interview as they couldn't reach a deal over it.
corf
15-08-2015
Originally Posted by RAN Man:
“If you have 2G and 4G what do you need 3G for?”

More bandwidth through more spectrum.

It seems that EE are sidelining MBNL to me
clewsy
15-08-2015
Or of course they are sideling most investment as they are leaving the market, so may as well increase profits for their shareholders and get costs down, before the deal is done with BT.

It's obvious things have slowed down, there must be the same number of old orange masts now as there was at the start of the year. Doesnt seem like much is happening.
de525ma
15-08-2015
Originally Posted by mupet0000:
“If this is the case, why do EE go in and upgrade 2G sites to 4G and leave out 3G entirely? Surely it's in their best interest to add 3G too.”

Lord Lucan said on another thread that this is due to landlords. I _think_ that as 4G and 2G use the same frequency and antennas, they don't need to renegotiate the contract with the landlord to upgrade the site. Presumably 3 could have access to this equipment if they wished to, they would just need to provide their cabinet.
pepstar
16-08-2015
I have a friend in the northern part of Shrewsbury, and a couple of months ago an orange mast was upgraded to MBNL with Three, so the work is definitely still going ahead
Zee_Bukhari
16-08-2015
Originally Posted by pepstar:
“I have a friend in the northern part of Shrewsbury, and a couple of months ago an orange mast was upgraded to MBNL with Three, so the work is definitely still going ahead”

That was a couple of months ago but EE seem to be trying to stall it. Three have enough power though to install their cabinets where they deem I needed most. I suspect Three will upgrade all those masts within a couple of months.
interactiv-uk
17-08-2015
The Orange 2G site near Ravenstonedale in Cumbria has been upgraded and is now kicking out a nice Three 3G signal. The new antennas look the same as the ones being installed on Three 800MHz ready sites so hopefully 4G800 will follow next month. Even if it doesn't, another 3G hole has been filled.
clewsy
17-08-2015
Plans for a 3 mast near me to be upgraded to 4g are not even by MBNL which seems strange.

It's like the 2 networks are running completly separatly in some areas. Very strange.
DevonBloke
17-08-2015
Ran Man may well be correct (he usually is) but on here it seems one hell of a lot of ex Orange 2G sites are going 2G/4G only. Found one in Devon the other day at Bickington (with 4G => 2G CSFB working properly).
It will be interesting to see how the one above Totnes (Windmill Down) goes. Currently very very slow legacy Orange 3G.
It is the only mast on any network that kind of covers Dartington (of the glass fame).
If you live in Dartington you are either on EE, Orange or TM or you have no signal.
If Ran Man is correct, then Three will use this one when it's upgraded.
Watch this space......
The Lord Lucan
17-08-2015
Sucks to be on Three...
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map