Originally Posted by dazza89:
“How is that even possible?, of course they aren't going to hire someone who will want to leave after a few months but they don't sign actors automatically down to 5 year contracts. They cannot stop actors wanting to leave, Ben Hardy did nearly two years, which wasn't that long but during that time was involved in one of the biggest stories the Beale family and Eastenders will do. Personally another recast is too soon so unless Ben wants to return I doubt we will see Peter Beale for a few years.”
It's not an exact science but even in interviews for entry-level jobs, there's an element of the employer getting to know your personality. I just feel seasoned casting directors would be able to get a feel for whether a prospective member of the cast would be tempted to leave for even a risky project, or whether they're more likely to want to settle down in EE for the foreseeable future. If you have a family, you'd probably enjoy the regular work that EE provides so would fall into the latter category. The younger actors with generally less responsibility might be keen to try new things elsewhere.
With that in mind, perhaps with the younger actors, you should take a less long-term approach to planning stories for them. I assume the character of Peter wouldn't have left the show had Ben Hardy not asked to leave; he would have stayed on the Square being a thorn in the rest of the Beales' side. However, Ben Hardy did leave and the writers have to deal with that. Deciding to replace him in the role of Peter with a new face just because "OMGZ, imagine if Peter and Lauren returns to save Max!!!!", I don't think is on. There's a skill to dealing with the cards that are dealt to you and in contrast, replacing actors Doctor-Who style and resurrecting characters to do what you originally planned is lazy.