|
||||||||
Big Brother USA 2015 - Episode 24 - HoH/Nominations - 17 August - 1.30am |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Avengers Mansion
Posts: 168,528
|
Big Brother USA 2015 - Episode 24 - HoH/Nominations - 17 August - 1.30am
Situation:
Shelli evicted and the first member of this year's jury Steve won the next HoH and in some baffling move put the two weakest players on the block in Meg and Jackie John then won the PoV which he didn't use, so Jackie was sent to the jury house with Shelli Total waste of an HoH, and hopefully whoever wins HoH tonight will not be as lily livered as Steve was Start delayed in some places due to golf |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Avengers Mansion
Posts: 168,528
|
hamsterwatch #BB17 @hamsterwatch 2m2 minutes ago
some streams are up now, some are not.. I'll be tweeting the show when it starts after golf delay #bb17 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
I'm amazed Steve finally realises he should have booted Becky. I mean what was he doing. Becky and Vanessa both surviving is hilarious.
I honestly cannot deal with Steve and Meg blubbering, this is Big Brother people. And of course Vanessa pounces on Steve in his vulnerable moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
They kept Vanessa over Shelli so I've no sympathy for Meg or James/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
|
Meg and James, and some others like Steve are just not gameplayers and weren't put in for that. Though, as always, I do wonder why some are put in. Steve's blubbering, supposedly 50% acting, was more annoying than funny. John as well hasn't really played much of a game from what I've seen. I don't like Vanessa though at least her paranoia creates some interest, don't really want her to get to the end though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 724
|
I really just don't like Steve at all... and even more each time he somehow tries to make out he's some sort of huge target with loads of influence and blood on his hands :/
Would Liz going after Vanessa be a good move for her this week? She's a number on her side but if she played it right she could make some great deals with the other side of the house and give herself a great moment for jury deliberation. I love the twins and their attitude but I really want Austin gone soon. It annoying how you just know Meg and Steve are going to now coast through to the late stages of the game but at least Meg knows she a crap player. Whatever happens I just know we will be seeing Shelli back in the game soon enough... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Apparently that chat with Vanessa/Johnny stuff was edited out according to feed watchers, stuff that wouldn't' exactly show Vanessa in a glowing light. On feeds she's even more of a paranoid wreck apparently than is being shown on the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,313
|
Quote:
Steve won the next HoH and in some baffling move put the two weakest players on the block in Meg and Jackie
John then won the PoV which he didn't use, so Jackie was sent to the jury house with Shelli Total waste of an HoH, and hopefully whoever wins HoH tonight will not be as lily livered as Steve was Quote:
I'm amazed Steve finally realises he should have booted Becky. I mean what was he doing. Becky and Vanessa both surviving is hilarious.
I honestly cannot deal with Steve and Meg blubbering, this is Big Brother people. And of course Vanessa pounces on Steve in his vulnerable moment. He specifically said to the cameras 24 hours before the double eviction that he was going to nominate Jackie and Meg, he then pulled John into a room and told him to target them if he wins... he knew what he was doing, no idea why he's lying in the DR. Quote:
They kept Vanessa over Shelli so I've no sympathy for Meg or James/.
Quote:
Apparently that chat with Vanessa/Johnny stuff was edited out according to feed watchers, stuff that wouldn't' exactly show Vanessa in a glowing light. On feeds she's even more of a paranoid wreck apparently than is being shown on the show.
I thought it was pretty harsh of them to show that 'bully' conversation. The edit did imply she was a bully, when she's anything but if you watch the feeds. People use the term so loosely now. It's Big Brother - John bitched about Vanessa, Clay went and threw him under the bus, Vanessa called him out and asked him who was lying James or Clay? Oh, such a bully, how dare she investigate when someone is trying to blow up her own game. John's suppose to be a superfan? He doesn't appear to have seen a single minute of the show; and if he has, he should've known he wouldn't be able to handle the pressure if he thinks that's "bullying". He ought to grow up. It's quite clear the show's setting Vanessa up for a fall. She'll probably be gone next week... I understand why many don't like her, but I don't think she's the 'villain' type. Everything is just being dumped on her because it's easier that way (from both a houseguest and editor perspective). |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22,680
|
Quote:
On feeds she's even more of a paranoid wreck apparently than is being shown on the show.
![]() They've been missing out on a lot of people's in depth moments this season though, not just Vanessa's. Audrey is perhaps the biggest omission so far, speaking of paranoia. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
|
I don't think the edit implied she was a bully. And it was hilarious when John said she shouted and yelled a lot and she seemed surprised at that.
One thing I'm tired of, and I've said it before, is all this addressing the camera outside of the DR. Is that the only way they think they can get their words across as the DR is heavily edited, guided and scripted even? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a Pine Box
Posts: 696
|
Is anyone really buying this pathetic act off steven? I find him a huge bore.
John is another one play acting with his load of over exaggerated nonsence. Can someone please have a strong word with these & future bbus housemates, to stop making ridiculous names up for alliances, Its so childish & every year another set try picking outrageous names & Failing miserably. Apart from the above its been a good series so far, Vanessa & Austin are running this house & its time they started looking at Austin & the twins if these housemates let this carry on might as well just give them the money now & be done with it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
I don't think the edit implied she was a bully. And it was hilarious when John said she shouted and yelled a lot and she seemed surprised at that.
One thing I'm tired of, and I've said it before, is all this addressing the camera outside of the DR. Is that the only way they think they can get their words across as the DR is heavily edited, guided and scripted even? If I was on BB I wouldn't tell the DR anything, particularly concerning strategy. Like Dannielle Reyes said on twitter the biggest problem with Vanessa is she doesn't own her shady gameplay, she acts so holier than thou even in the DR. Just own that'll you slit anyones throat if you need to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,313
|
Quote:
Can someone please have a strong word with these & future bbus housemates, to stop making ridiculous names up for alliances, Its so childish & every year another set try picking outrageous names & Failing miserably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Yep and didn't they forbid them from using Freaks and Geeks due to copyright, its so contrived
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,361
|
I really really don't like Austin, he just gives me the creeps. And Steve, I just have no words to explain my dislike for him. Useless player that just needs to go, even his fake crying was just irritating to watch and if I have to watch him talk to himself and have anymore full on conversations I will lose my sanity.
John M for me is the only truly likeable and root-able one currently. Also the twins but they just need to lose Austin first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
Vanessa is already being shown as the 'villain' - what more do people want? I thought it was pretty harsh of them to show that 'bully' conversation. The edit did imply she was a bully, when she's anything but if you watch the feeds. People use the term so loosely now. It's Big Brother - John bitched about Vanessa, Clay went and threw him under the bus, Vanessa called him out and asked him who was lying James or Clay? Oh, such a bully, how dare she investigate when someone is trying to blow up her own game. John's suppose to be a superfan? He doesn't appear to have seen a single minute of the show; and if he has, he should've known he wouldn't be able to handle the pressure if he thinks that's "bullying". He ought to grow up. It's quite clear the show's setting Vanessa up for a fall. She'll probably be gone next week... I understand why many don't like her, but I don't think she's the 'villain' type. Everything is just being dumped on her because it's easier that way (from both a houseguest and editor perspective). Non-feed watchers like Vanessa more than the ones who watch the feeds so I don't think she is the villain of the season when in fact she should just own that she is as Danielle Reyes suggested, I don't get why nowadays nobody is happy to play the villain role, they all in recent seasons have some weird desire to be liked by their housemates and society. Gone are the Danielle Reyes/Jun type women who don't give a hoot what others think. She needs to own that she is a shady game-player and will cut anyone's throat to get ahead rather than whine about how hard done by she is in the DR. James has owned his backtracking on Clay and Shelli now Vanessa needs to own her shit too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
|
Quote:
Non-feed watchers like Vanessa more than the ones who watch the feeds so I don't think she is the villain of the season when in fact she should just own that she is as Danielle Reyes suggested, I don't get why nowadays nobody is happy to play the villain role, they all in recent seasons have some weird desire to be liked by their housemates and society. Gone are the Danielle Reyes/Jun type women who don't give a hoot what others think.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:19.



