• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Peter Andre
<<
<
11 of 22
>>
>
Walter Neff
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by primer:
“for all you peter andre fans...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...h-threats.html

”

No surprise at all, to me he has always come across as a phony, greasy slimeball.
Jerrybob
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Walter Neff:
“No surprise at all, to me he has always come across as a phony, greasy slimeball. ”

What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
NotaTypo
09-10-2015
I predict a sympathy gaining injury... But not bad enough that he'd have to bow out, of course. Brave little soldier, dancing through the pain, cheered on by some of his kids (who he loves).
Walter Neff
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Jerrybob:
“What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?”

Because the image that he attempts to impress his fans with is probably nothing like his real self.
dancingbearbear
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Jerrybob:
“What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?”

What has much of the generalised discussion of the celebs lives, activities and behaviour got to do with Strictly?

If the forum restricted itself solely to discussion of the 1 minute and 20 seconds of dance performed by each contestant there wouldn't be much to be said (especially as each dance now contains about 20 seconds of actual dancing, if that).

Celebs come on SCD to up their public profile, and as such their career and life beyond the parameters of the show are inevitably discussed by viewers.

This is a pretty damning characterisation, and one that many feel was bound to surface sooner or later, given the way PA (and indeed many other 'famous for being famous' types) manipulate the media (and the truth) in order to keep the cash flowing their way.
Sarah_Jones5
09-10-2015
The story is also in the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...eality-TV-prod
edy10
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by primer:
“for all you peter andre fans...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...h-threats.html

”

Walter Neff
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Sarah_Jones5:
“The story is also in the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...eality-TV-prod”

Is anyone else thinking that he won't be top of the leader board tomorrow night?

His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow.
TerryM22
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Walter Neff:
“Is anyone else thinking that he won't be top of the leader board tomorrow night?

His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow. ”

Peters fans are in it for the long haul.
cate o connor
09-10-2015
I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.
sofakat
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by cate o connor:
“I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.”

A very eminent judge, who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom, begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness. He did not believe him. At all. His job is to get to the truth.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?
Walter Neff
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by TerryM22:
“Peters fans are in it for the long haul.”

They may be, but I doubt if P'duh will.
hunniebun
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“A very eminent judge (who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom) begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. Reporting it as normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?”

One of our country's judges main roles is to reach judgement on the reliability of those giving evidence - and high court judges have years of experience doing so - so I always get confused when people think that Judges don't know what they're talking about!!

One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge!
Red66
09-10-2015
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
Scarlett Berry
09-10-2015
OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.
sofakat
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by hunniebun:
“One of our country's judges main roles is to reach judgement on the reliability of those giving evidence - and high court judges have years of experience doing so - so I always get confused when people think that Judges don't know what they're talking about!!

One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge!”

Whaaaat! Oh dear, oh dear. Any excuse eh? Did they read the bit about the Judge actually seeing Nev for who he was, but still being able to differentiate between what is fair and what is not - and a broken contract.

What can we do? Some people see what they want to see

*face palm*
sofakat
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Red66:
“While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.”

Er, yeah. But they have to prove it, and Andre didn't. Oh hang on, Andre proved he was a diva wuss.

He also behaved appallingly over a contract, tried to wriggle out of it and destroy a man's livelihood. Yep. Peter Andre is such a mensch.
sofakat
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.”

An awful pregnant silence, followed by the air turning blue.

I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one.
aggs
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“A very eminent judge, who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom, begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness. He did not believe him. At all. His job is to get to the truth.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?”

Juss jellus
sofakat
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Juss jellus ”

Aaahhhh! *slaps forehead* Silly me! Why did I not see that?
dancingbearbear
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Red66:
“While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.”

I agree that judges are not infallible. But I cannot think of any scenario in which I would give greater credence the words of Peter Andre versus those of a high court judge.
coppertop1
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Red66:
“While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.”

Just why would a judge sift the evidence having the tweets in front of him and decide that Peter was the liar in the whole case. Perhaps he is a Jay fan

It seems no one has covered themselves in glory in this whole case. If I were Peter I would keep very quiet over this unless the judge decides he needs to be charged with lying to the court.
dancingbearbear
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“An awful pregnant silence, followed by the air turning blue.

I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one.”

I'd place money on BAYBEEWARZZZZZ!!!! tomorrow night. PA really loves his kids, and he'll certainly not forget to let us know that
Blondie X
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by dancingbearbear:
“I agree that judges are not infallible. But I cannot think of any scenario in which I would give greater credence the words of Peter Andre versus those of a high court judge.”

Oh come on, why doubt the word of a man whom wrote that legendary all time classic 'Insania' whilst in the jungle just off the top of his head? Oh wait................
shuddupfluffy
09-10-2015
The problem with PA is that he peddles a 'reality' - what you see is what you get - persona. The truth of it is that it's a manufactured persona based on what his PR want you to believe.

Unfortunately for him, a judge can see where unreality ends and reality begins!

That's what happens when you're reduced to selling your personal life to the highest bidder.
<<
<
11 of 22
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map