|
||||||||
Peter Andre |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#251 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
No surprise at all, to me he has always come across as a phony, greasy slimeball.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,826
|
I predict a sympathy gaining injury... But not bad enough that he'd have to bow out, of course. Brave little soldier, dancing through the pain, cheered on by some of his kids (who he loves).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
|
Quote:
What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
|
Quote:
What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
If the forum restricted itself solely to discussion of the 1 minute and 20 seconds of dance performed by each contestant there wouldn't be much to be said (especially as each dance now contains about 20 seconds of actual dancing, if that). Celebs come on SCD to up their public profile, and as such their career and life beyond the parameters of the show are inevitably discussed by viewers. This is a pretty damning characterisation, and one that many feel was bound to surface sooner or later, given the way PA (and indeed many other 'famous for being famous' types) manipulate the media (and the truth) in order to keep the cash flowing their way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
|
Quote:
![]() His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
|
Quote:
Is anyone else thinking that he won't be top of the leader board tomorrow night?
![]() His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 252
|
I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.
Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really? ![]() Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law. Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law? |
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
|
Quote:
Peters fans are in it for the long haul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 912
|
Quote:
A very eminent judge (who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom) begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness.
Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really? ![]() Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. Reporting it as normal. It is the law. Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law? One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge! |
|
|
|
|
|
#264 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 24
|
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#265 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
One of our country's judges main roles is to reach judgement on the reliability of those giving evidence - and high court judges have years of experience doing so - so I always get confused when people think that Judges don't know what they're talking about!!
One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge! What can we do? Some people see what they want to see ![]() *face palm* |
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
He also behaved appallingly over a contract, tried to wriggle out of it and destroy a man's livelihood. Yep. Peter Andre is such a mensch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.
![]() I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
A very eminent judge, who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom, begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness. He did not believe him. At all. His job is to get to the truth.
Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really? ![]() Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law. Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
Juss jellus
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#271 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
|
Quote:
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,161
|
Quote:
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
![]() It seems no one has covered themselves in glory in this whole case. If I were Peter I would keep very quiet over this unless the judge decides he needs to be charged with lying to the court. |
|
|
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
|
Quote:
An awful pregnant silence, followed by the air turning blue.
I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,541
|
Quote:
I agree that judges are not infallible. But I cannot think of any scenario in which I would give greater credence the words of Peter Andre versus those of a high court judge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#275 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in my house with a coffee
Posts: 3,149
|
The problem with PA is that he peddles a 'reality' - what you see is what you get - persona. The truth of it is that it's a manufactured persona based on what his PR want you to believe.
Unfortunately for him, a judge can see where unreality ends and reality begins! That's what happens when you're reduced to selling your personal life to the highest bidder. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36.





