DS Forums

 
 

Peter Andre


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2015, 10:55
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
No surprise at all, to me he has always come across as a phony, greasy slimeball.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 09-10-2015, 11:08
Jerrybob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,614
No surprise at all, to me he has always come across as a phony, greasy slimeball.
What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
Jerrybob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 11:12
NotaTypo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,826
I predict a sympathy gaining injury... But not bad enough that he'd have to bow out, of course. Brave little soldier, dancing through the pain, cheered on by some of his kids (who he loves).
NotaTypo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 11:54
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
Because the image that he attempts to impress his fans with is probably nothing like his real self.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 12:19
dancingbearbear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
What has that got to do with him being on Strictly?
What has much of the generalised discussion of the celebs lives, activities and behaviour got to do with Strictly?

If the forum restricted itself solely to discussion of the 1 minute and 20 seconds of dance performed by each contestant there wouldn't be much to be said (especially as each dance now contains about 20 seconds of actual dancing, if that).

Celebs come on SCD to up their public profile, and as such their career and life beyond the parameters of the show are inevitably discussed by viewers.

This is a pretty damning characterisation, and one that many feel was bound to surface sooner or later, given the way PA (and indeed many other 'famous for being famous' types) manipulate the media (and the truth) in order to keep the cash flowing their way.
dancingbearbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 14:42
Sarah_Jones5
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,344
The story is also in the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...eality-TV-prod
Sarah_Jones5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 15:32
edy10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
edy10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 17:46
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
Is anyone else thinking that he won't be top of the leader board tomorrow night?

His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 17:48
TerryM22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
Is anyone else thinking that he won't be top of the leader board tomorrow night?

His fans aren't exactly rushing to his Appreciation thread, just 14, compared to Jay, who has a total of 246 messages, and who hopefully WILL be the Top Man tomorrow.
Peters fans are in it for the long haul.
TerryM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 17:49
cate o connor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 252
I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.
cate o connor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:00
sofakat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
I don't know whether or not Peter Andre genuinely felt threatened by Hendricks, but then neither does the judge. So to have publically made the comments he did was very unfair. Having read the vicious rants in question, which went on for weeks and weeks, both to the mother of his child, and Andre, I think most people would have been afraid of Hendricks.
A very eminent judge, who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom, begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness. He did not believe him. At all. His job is to get to the truth.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?
sofakat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:03
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 6,700
Peters fans are in it for the long haul.
They may be, but I doubt if P'duh will.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:10
hunniebun
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 912
A very eminent judge (who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom) begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. Reporting it as normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?
One of our country's judges main roles is to reach judgement on the reliability of those giving evidence - and high court judges have years of experience doing so - so I always get confused when people think that Judges don't know what they're talking about!!

One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge!
hunniebun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:16
Red66
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 24
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
Red66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:17
Scarlett Berry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.
Scarlett Berry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:25
sofakat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
One of our country's judges main roles is to reach judgement on the reliability of those giving evidence - and high court judges have years of experience doing so - so I always get confused when people think that Judges don't know what they're talking about!!

One of his fans on twitter even thinks that Nev must have paid the judge!
Whaaaat! Oh dear, oh dear. Any excuse eh? Did they read the bit about the Judge actually seeing Nev for who he was, but still being able to differentiate between what is fair and what is not - and a broken contract.

What can we do? Some people see what they want to see

*face palm*
sofakat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:28
sofakat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
Er, yeah. But they have to prove it, and Andre didn't. Oh hang on, Andre proved he was a diva wuss.

He also behaved appallingly over a contract, tried to wriggle out of it and destroy a man's livelihood. Yep. Peter Andre is such a mensch.
sofakat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:30
sofakat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
OMG..can you imagine the scene in Chez P'duh when this ruling was revealed.
An awful pregnant silence, followed by the air turning blue.

I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one.
sofakat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:31
aggs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
A very eminent judge, who frankly has seen it all in the courtroom, begs to differ and found Peter to be an unreliable witness. He did not believe him. At all. His job is to get to the truth.

Are you saying the High Court judge is an idiot, or blind or unable to differentiate between honesty and diva behaviour? Really?

Making a judgement (or as you say making comment in public - erm, as judges do in court which are then reported justifiably) is normal. It is the law.

Unless of course you think Peter Andre is above the law?
Juss jellus
aggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:33
sofakat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
Aaahhhh! *slaps forehead* Silly me! Why did I not see that?
sofakat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:34
dancingbearbear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
I agree that judges are not infallible. But I cannot think of any scenario in which I would give greater credence the words of Peter Andre versus those of a high court judge.
dancingbearbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:35
coppertop1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,161
While not a Peter Andre fan, Judges are not infallible. There are a few who have made really appalling decisions recently ... one in the news today involving a repeat offender. To refer to what someone said upthread, if someone feels threatened they are entitled to say so surely.
Just why would a judge sift the evidence having the tweets in front of him and decide that Peter was the liar in the whole case. Perhaps he is a Jay fan

It seems no one has covered themselves in glory in this whole case. If I were Peter I would keep very quiet over this unless the judge decides he needs to be charged with lying to the court.
coppertop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:36
dancingbearbear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
An awful pregnant silence, followed by the air turning blue.

I'm dying to see how they handle the PR on this one.
I'd place money on BAYBEEWARZZZZZ!!!! tomorrow night. PA really loves his kids, and he'll certainly not forget to let us know that
dancingbearbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:37
Blondie X
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,541
I agree that judges are not infallible. But I cannot think of any scenario in which I would give greater credence the words of Peter Andre versus those of a high court judge.
Oh come on, why doubt the word of a man whom wrote that legendary all time classic 'Insania' whilst in the jungle just off the top of his head? Oh wait................
Blondie X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2015, 18:38
shuddupfluffy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in my house with a coffee
Posts: 3,149
The problem with PA is that he peddles a 'reality' - what you see is what you get - persona. The truth of it is that it's a manufactured persona based on what his PR want you to believe.

Unfortunately for him, a judge can see where unreality ends and reality begins!

That's what happens when you're reduced to selling your personal life to the highest bidder.
shuddupfluffy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36.