• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Sorry but the line up sucks...
<<
<
3 of 9
>>
>
pjh8
24-08-2015
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“The show shouldn't be chasing 20somethings. They're a very small proportion of the Saturday Night audience, and well catered for by what's on the other side at the same time if they're looking for reality tv to watch. Fair enough have a few people in the line up for young people (the "fit" boxer, the soap stars and the Wanted has-been I guess?) but the sort of ITV2 backwash line-up they had last year really hurt the ratings. Bake Off's now the biggest show on tv anyway, and they've not got there by chasing trendies.”

I'm A Celebrity and BGT shouldn't be disregarded. They accommodate childern, 20 something's as well as older viewers and contain "ITV2 backwash" and still are demolishing BBC shows ratings wise.
danielleh
24-08-2015
Originally Posted by blueface2222:
“I'm a big Strictly fan, watch every year and...

quite honestly so far we have.
Jeremy Vine....radio 2 presenter...
Ainsley Harriot...Ready steady Cook
Kellie Bright...Eastenders
Georgia ay...Coronation Street
Carol Kirkwood...BBC breakfast
Peter Andre...of Peter Andre fame
Katie Derham...BBC Proms
Daniel O Donnell....Irish television presenter
Anthony Ogogo...Olympics


OK well:
We can't recreate Louis Smith with Anthony. They even look alike boring.
I don't care for Daniel, Katie, Carol...too boring for me
Peter Andre well thats a OK choice to be fair
Kylie Bright and Ainsley ain't bad.
But the rest are DULL!?

This is supposed to be the No.1 tv show in the UK...this is the line up? It's like an advertisement for the phelotra of BBC services! Oh and please no contestants from The Apprentice, X Factor or Big Brother. That is beyond ridiculous they aren't celebs!

Whats the problem are Big Brother paying more!? Where are the real celebs?”

I guess comments like this are a perfect example of how we can all see things differently. For me, Peter Andre is probably the worst/least exciting signing so far; a faded popstar turned reality TV veteran.

What's been great about the signings so far is that they all feel fresh - we don't know what we're going to get from them. They could be good, bad, hilarious, the thing is that we don't know. This attitude of, "Who? They're dull" is really closed-minded. Give them a chance, you may end up loving them.
Jake2008
25-08-2015
I was really impressed when Frankie, Pixie and Caroline were all signed up last year, after Jeremy and Kellie this year I haven't been excited for anyone else yet, hoping for a stellar finale of reveals now (really not impressed with Jay and Anita btw)
jake lyle
25-08-2015
Lol in the real world all 4 are Itv2 nobodies'. Towie has 700k viewers, Jeremy Vine has 7m listeners

Originally Posted by ncl*girl:
“Too many BBC employees for me

When you can look at the line up and think Peter Andre is the biggest star out of the lot so far you know you've got issues...

Last year had Pixie Lott? Caroline Flack? Mark Wright? Simon Webbe?

None of these celebs to me are really appealing to a younger audience (i.e. mid 20's) like they did”

shrinkingviolet
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by aggs:
“There's the same number of BBC people as normal - take series 2 ... a BBC gardener, a BBC motoring correspondent, a recently retired athlete being groomed for BBC sports commentary, a radio/Songs of Praise presenter, the doyenne of BBC, a Casualty actress, an ex Eastenders actress ... I think the only one without any form of BBC connection was Carol.

Fast forward to series 8 ... 3 people with ties to Eastenders, a BBC presenter, 2 older ladies with ties to BBC classic shows, a radio DJ, a magician with a long history of BBC Saturday night shows ... It really is situation normal.”

Yeah, I'm kinda confused by the number of people seemingly upset at BBC employees being on one of the BBC's flagship shows. It's pretty much the norm.

I think it's a good lineup so far - I think there is someone to appeal to most people, we're maybe missing another sportsperson and an obvious week 1 exit, but I think it's a decent calibre of celeb.
edy10
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by sambadan:
“I fear for SCD, I really do.
The potential for it to get some higher profile celebs seems to have fallen by the wayside.
I suspect that money and cutbacks within the BBC has a lot to do with it. They simply can't afford the bigger names even for their flagship show.
Governments of any persuasion seem intent on making the life of the BBC a misery.
My feeling is the Tories are convinced the BBC are pro Labour while Labour are convinced it is pro Tory and the rest thinking it is pro both while paying lip service to the other parties. Governments of different persuasions have imo consistently tried to belittle the BBC and reduce its influence and credibility. Talk of changing the way the BBC is funded to me is code for reducing its financial muscle.
This is already being felt with the BBC having lost the rights to various sporting events and it having them further curtailed from 2016. The BBC is I believe operating to constraints like never before and politicians are largely to blame.
I hate to bring up the dreaded words 'The X Factor' but I feel I must. Cheryl Fernandez Versini, Rita Ora, Simon Cowell.
Like them or loathe them I would suggest they are all bigger names than anyone recruited for SCD in 2016 even as judges rather than contestants.
I am left to conclude that on the basis that I feel image often triumphs over substance that the ratings battle will be comprehensively won by ITV this year.
A sad state of affairs indeed.”


That's a bit dramatic, don't you think ?
edy10
25-08-2015
I'm waiting till the launch show before I start to make any judgements about this cast.
missfrankiecat
25-08-2015
I don't think the 'recognisability' of the 'celebs' matters in the slightest. My two all time favourite contestants thus far were a rugby player and a female soap star neither of whom I had ever heard of nor watched before they did SCD. I was hooked because of their (very different) personalities and the great relationships they developed with their pros. It helped that both had innate dancing ability but neither were trained dancers. On the other hand previous 'big' signings have left me cold - Emma Bunton, anyone?
Ellie1967
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by sambadan:
“I fear for SCD, I really do.
The potential for it to get some higher profile celebs seems to have fallen by the wayside.
I suspect that money and cutbacks within the BBC has a lot to do with it. They simply can't afford the bigger names even for their flagship show.”

I'm not sure that their inability to get celebs is down to money - the pay on Strictly has never been great compared to other reality shows but it used to be the show where you weren't humiliated and could tell everyone you were 'learning a skill'. I think the show has made itself less appealing by making celebs dress up in ridiculous costumes (crabs, spacemen etc.) to dance to inappropriate music while not actually learning proper ballroom dancing most of the time. They then have to dress up in more daft costumes to film the 'comedy' VTs with everyone taking part looking like they want the ground to open up and swallow them. They've encouraged the 'curse of Strictly' publicity so much that there's probably now a few happily married celebs who would rather not deal with all the stories in the press hinting they might be getting too close to their partner. The show has always been quite a commitment to take on at around 4 month's hard work, but celebs have probably seen that you now have to do over 30 hours training a week just to be competitive, plus ITT, filming VTs, making appearances at events with your partner etc. - its probably just not that attractive compared to sitting in a jungle for a week, followed by a week in a 5 star hotel.
aggs
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by missfrankiecat:
“I don't think the 'recognisability' of the 'celebs' matters in the slightest. My two all time favourite contestants thus far were a rugby player and a female soap star neither of whom I had ever heard of nor watched before they did SCD. I was hooked because of their (very different) personalities and the great relationships they developed with their pros. It helped that both had innate dancing ability but neither were trained dancers. On the other hand previous 'big' signings have left me cold - Emma Bunton, anyone?”

Didn't Emma take part when the phone votes went to Children in Need - and she was the artist performing the CiN single for that year with the Strictly cast appearing in the official video? I seem to remember there being mutterings that she was protected with high marks for as long as it took the single to be released.

I would say that one of the biggest signings was Martina Hingis - and she was knocked out in week one. By Rav Wilding.
Alleycat666
25-08-2015
First one I've not heard of - Jay from The Wanted (although I have heard of them, just don't know the names of them all).

Anita Rani should be ok - seems very enthusiastic already!
Scarlett Berry
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by j4Rose:
“Yes, he's a "singer" ”

Mock all you want, he is an award winning singer, selling millions of albums and dvds. May not be to your or my taste either but the facts are he is a very successful and wealthy singer.
Scarlett Berry
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by Ellie1967:
“I'm not sure that their inability to get celebs is down to money - the pay on Strictly has never been great compared to other reality shows but it used to be the show where you weren't humiliated and could tell everyone you were 'learning a skill'. I think the show has made itself less appealing by making celebs dress up in ridiculous costumes (crabs, spacemen etc.) to dance to inappropriate music while not actually learning proper ballroom dancing most of the time. They then have to dress up in more daft costumes to film the 'comedy' VTs with everyone taking part looking like they want the ground to open up and swallow them. They've encouraged the 'curse of Strictly' publicity so much that there's probably now a few happily married celebs who would rather not deal with all the stories in the press hinting they might be getting too close to their partner. The show has always been quite a commitment to take on at around 4 month's hard work, but celebs have probably seen that you now have to do over 30 hours training a week just to be competitive, plus ITT, filming VTs, making appearances at events with your partner etc. - its probably just not that attractive compared to sitting in a jungle for a week, followed by a week in a 5 star hotel.”

Great post Ellie

For me the introduction of those risable vts and hideous daft costumes has been a real low for the show. Scott Mills dressed as a crab... who thought that was a good idea.
Monkseal
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by pjh8:
“I'm A Celebrity and BGT shouldn't be disregarded. They accommodate childern, 20 something's as well as older viewers and contain "ITV2 backwash" and still are demolishing BBC shows ratings wise.”

The point is the variety. There was very little variety in last year's Final 6 - it was 3 popstars (all appealing to more or less the same generation), a host of a reality tv programme about popstars appealing to that same generation, one of the bigger names of reality tv pioneered by that generation, and Jake Wood. Compare this to the final 6 of I'm A Celebrity which ran from a popular mainstream rapper to a motorsport champion to Edwina Currie and it's obvious which has broader appeal. Likewise, and not to harp on about it, but Series 8 of Strictly had a similarly diverse final 6 (a young and sweet female soap star, a mature "bad boy" hunk soap star, a hunk sports star/reality tv star, a comedy Tory politician, a Nice Young Man hunk(ish) host of nice middle-class BBC 1 programmes, and an older comedienne) and had the best ratings they've ever had by miles.
Jayinthegarden
25-08-2015
I agree with Ellie's post entirely
J.R
25-08-2015
I just had a thought - Tom Jones has some time on his hands perhaps he would be this years 'oldie'. I'm not serious obviously but it would certainly be a headline grabber!
Monkseal
25-08-2015
When people are talking about big names who did Strictly in its halcyon days when it was all ballroom dancing and serious training who are they talking about? From a quick squizz through the first 7 series it's basically just Emma Bunton and the odd sports star. (I will concede that I do think their casting of sports celebrities has got awful. For the last three series it appears to have just been done by flicking through Attitude magazine and seeing whose got their arse out this week).
jake lyle
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“The point is the variety. There was very little variety in last year's Final 6 - it was 3 popstars (all appealing to more or less the same generation), a host of a reality tv programme about popstars appealing to that same generation, one of the bigger names of reality tv pioneered by that generation, and Jake Wood. Compare this to the final 6 of I'm A Celebrity which ran from a popular mainstream rapper to a motorsport champion to Edwina Currie and it's obvious which has broader appeal. Likewise, and not to harp on about it, but Series 8 of Strictly had a similarly diverse final 6 (a young and sweet female soap star, a mature "bad boy" hunk soap star, a hunk sports star/reality tv star, a comedy Tornakkkkkkk politician, a Nice Young Man hunk(ish) host of nice middle-class BBC 1 programmes, and an older comedienne) and had the best ratings they've ever had by miles.”

Brilliant analysis
Alleycat666
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“When people are talking about big names who did Strictly in its halcyon days when it was all ballroom dancing and serious training who are they talking about? From a quick squizz through the first 7 series it's basically just Emma Bunton and the odd sports star. (I will concede that I do think their casting of sports celebrities has got awful. For the last three series it appears to have just been done by flicking through Attitude magazine and seeing whose got their arse out this week).”

Since Jade Johnson (I think was her name) did her knee in a few series back I wouldn't be surprised if they struggle to get 'current' sports stars because of the risk - and maybe even the insurance (you never know) - nobody would want to risk their careers learning to dance.
jiroos
25-08-2015
No worries, the line up will shine brightly once the magnificant Goldie Hawn is revealed as our final addition to the line-up.
aggs
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by Alleycat666:
“Since Jade Johnson (I think was her name) did her knee in a few series back I wouldn't be surprised if they struggle to get 'current' sports stars because of the risk - and maybe even the insurance (you never know) - nobody would want to risk their careers learning to dance.”

And yet Anthony with his crocked shoulder is doing just that - which is a bit baffling! This year was never going to be a vintage one for sports people - next year post Olympics will be the big one. The last pre Olympic series gave us Dan Lobb, Audley Harrison and Robbie Savage. I think quota-wise we are due another sports person, but can't see it being anyone super current.
aggs
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“When people are talking about big names who did Strictly in its halcyon days when it was all ballroom dancing and serious training who are they talking about? From a quick squizz through the first 7 series it's basically just Emma Bunton and the odd sports star. (I will concede that I do think their casting of sports celebrities has got awful. For the last three series it appears to have just been done by flicking through Attitude magazine and seeing whose got their arse out this week).”

Don't mean it's a bad way of doing it
Probably the biggest actual name in the first half of the series numbers was Martina Hingis - and however long it took the powers that be to lure her to the dance floor, the voters thanked them by dumping her in the first bottom two and the judges thanked them by keeping Rav Wilding instead. They probably just gave up after that.
A.D.P
25-08-2015
Each year someone posts a thread like this then each year the show gets stronger and better. We haven't had all the celebrities confirmed as yet, and there is already far far well known people that shows like I am a celebrity which with bigger money only attracts former celebrity's who are trying to get their stardom back.
Ellie1967
25-08-2015
Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“Each year someone posts a thread like this then each year the show gets stronger and better. We haven't had all the celebrities confirmed as yet, and there is already far far well known people that shows like I am a celebrity which with bigger money only attracts former celebrity's who are trying to get their stardom back.”

Looked at in ratings terms, the BIB isn't actually true - the highest viewing figures were for the 2010 final and last year's final had the lowest viewing figures since 2009.

Also, several people who have done Strictly had already done I'm a Celebrity first, so some might say Strictly was getting I'm a Celeb's sloppy seconds
andallthatjazz
25-08-2015
Gotta say the line-up announcement started off quite promising and rather exciting but as they go along announcing more it's now a case of "who"???.

latest zelebs announced were just a case of scraping bottom of the barrel now.
<<
<
3 of 9
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map