• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Do you like Austin?
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
patsylimerick
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by Libretio:
“Nope. Some of the things on here are interpretation, which isn't the same thing at all. You're interpreting things in such a way as to criticise Austin's motives and behaviour because you think he's a bitch, etc. You were trying to suggest his argument with Janice materialised out of thin air and I pointed out that it was the culmination of his disquiet over a series of things she had done. That's a fact. You interpreted the incident differently, which skewed the truth.


Not personal, though I concede it could look that way. It was a statement of fact. The argument still stands, despite your assertions to the contrary.


There's a difference between being critical of someone's behaviour - in front of them, or behind their back - and being a mean-spirited bitch with anger issues. The only people they've criticised are the ones who've been giving them a hard time in one way or another. Farrah, in particular, is a nasty, shit-stirring, immature dunce who showed her true colours when she caused a huge commotion over the fact that James was looking at her! Instead of making a joke about it, she immediately went on the attack and escalated the whole thing to ridiculous proportions. When you're stuck in a confined space with people of THIS calibre, you're going to react in a negative way. Your argument would hold more weight if the 'mean boys' had been slagging off people who didn't actually deserve it, but that's not the case.


I don't recall them seeking out those opinions at all. They happened to be in a conversation which turned to this particular subject and it all kicked off because Farrah - again - wouldn't own up to her own latent homophobia (describing Austin as James' "boyfriend" in a negative way during the aforementioned argument, the sexual innuendo about James 'slip-sliding', etc.), and instead opted to throw another wobbly to hide her ugly deceit. These are dreadful people, and Austin simply WILL NOT let them dominate the house with their horrendous behaviour. Good for him.”

First bit in bold - each person's interpretation of events is their opinion.

Second bit in bold - not true; they were having a right old bitch about Farrah, Jenna and Janice as they were putting on their make-up. Austin was bitching about Farrah - with Natasha - before he'd ever spoken to her. His backtracking when Jenna called him out was hilarious.

They are dreadful people - Jenna, Farrah, Janice and particularly, James and Austin.
DiamondDoll
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by Libretio:
“Nope. Some of the things on here are interpretation, which isn't the same thing at all. You're interpreting things in such a way as to criticise Austin's motives and behaviour because you think he's a bitch, etc. You were trying to suggest his argument with Janice materialised out of thin air and I pointed out that it was the culmination of his disquiet over a series of things she had done. That's a fact. You interpreted the incident differently, which skewed the truth.



Not personal, though I concede it could look that way. It was a statement of fact. The argument still stands, despite your assertions to the contrary.



There's a difference between being critical of someone's behaviour - in front of them, or behind their back - and being a mean-spirited bitch with anger issues. The only people they've criticised are the ones who've been giving them a hard time in one way or another. Farrah, in particular, is a nasty, shit-stirring, immature dunce who showed her true colours when she caused a huge commotion over the fact that James was looking at her! Instead of making a joke about it, she immediately went on the attack and escalated the whole thing to ridiculous proportions. When you're stuck in a confined space with people of THIS calibre, you're going to react in a negative way. Your argument would hold more weight if the 'mean boys' had been slagging off people who didn't actually deserve it, but that's not the case.



I don't recall them seeking out those opinions at all. They happened to be in a conversation which turned to this particular subject and it all kicked off because Farrah - again - wouldn't own up to her own latent homophobia (describing Austin as James' "boyfriend" in a negative way during the aforementioned argument, the sexual innuendo about James 'slip-sliding', etc.), and instead opted to throw another wobbly to hide her ugly deceit. These are dreadful people, and Austin simply WILL NOT let them dominate the house with their horrendous behaviour. Good for him.”

Three cheers for Libretio.

I do like your style.
mistygal
01-09-2015
Austin is the biggest Diva in that house. He is working his way round for all the arguments. He has just started with the ones he knows will bite first. No I dont like him.
Libretio
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“First bit in bold - each person's interpretation of events is their opinion.”

Tie this one in as many knots as you like, but it won't change the details of the point I was making. Your interpretation skewed the truth.

Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“Second bit in bold - not true; they were having a right old bitch about Farrah, Jenna and Janice as they were putting on their make-up. Austin was bitching about Farrah - with Natasha - before he'd ever spoken to her. His backtracking when Jenna called him out was hilarious.”

I missed the first episode, so I didn't see this. If it's true, then I can only suggest they must have seen something in those three which has been borne out by their subsequent behaviour. And Jenna calling ANYBODY out for slagging others behind their backs is hilarious in itself, since she's been right in the thick of it since the show began.

Austin may be loud, but he sees these people for what they are. I hope he wins the whole damn thing.
patsylimerick
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by Libretio:
“Tie this one in as many knots as you like, but it won't change the details of the point I was making. Your interpretation skewed the truth.



I missed the first episode, so I didn't see this. If it's true, then I can only suggest they must have seen something in those three which has been borne out by their subsequent behaviour. And Jenna calling ANYBODY out for slagging others behind their backs is hilarious in itself, since she's been right in the thick of it since the show began.

Austin may be loud, but he sees these people for what they are. I hope he wins the whole damn thing.”

Or, my opinion differs from yours. Your 'truth' is subjective.
Libretio
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“Or, my opinion differs from yours. Your 'truth' is subjective.”

No, my 'truth' was, er... the truth.
yellowlabbie
01-09-2015
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“First bit in bold - each person's interpretation of events is their opinion.

Second bit in bold - not true; they were having a right old bitch about Farrah, Jenna and Janice as they were putting on their make-up. Austin was bitching about Farrah - with Natasha - before he'd ever spoken to her. His backtracking when Jenna called him out was hilarious.

They are dreadful people - Jenna, Farrah, Janice and particularly, James and Austin.”

I agree, they are dreadful people, it is there for all to see.
Ferilatgatr
01-09-2015
Yep, I especially like his ass
Gravitational
02-09-2015
Yes.

He makes me laugh.
Seymour
02-09-2015
Do you like Austin?

Nearly as much as I like Farrah and Jenna. LOL
yellowlabbie
02-09-2015
No I dislike him as much as I do Janice, Farrah and Jenna.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map