And he deserves it horrible man 
Haha Burrell getting boos
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Emma should check to see if her wedding ring is still on her finger.”
“Emma should check to see if her wedding ring is still on her finger.”
He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.
Originally Posted by paralax:
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
He did, he wrote two books about it. There was a massive uproar about it in the early noughties.
Originally Posted by paralax:
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
This is only part of the truth he nicked loads of stuff his house was rammed full
Originally Posted by Stellen11:
“totally deserved. his claim to fame is stealing princess di's nick nacks!”
“totally deserved. his claim to fame is stealing princess di's nick nacks!”
He got them out of her apartment for her boys, because Diana's mother was taking everything and people were trying to shred stuff. Even the Queen apologised to him because she realised that, when he told her, she had given him permission to take Diana's stuff home with him.
Originally Posted by paralax:
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
I agree - I wish people wouldn't just believe what the papers say. Paul Burrell was 'got at' by whoever killed Diana.
Is it true he was regularly ****** by ****** ****** and all the other ******* in the ****** ******** at Buckingham palace?
Originally Posted by puddy:
“I agree - I wish people wouldn't just believe what the papers say. Paul Burrell was 'got at' by whoever killed Diana.”
“I agree - I wish people wouldn't just believe what the papers say. Paul Burrell was 'got at' by whoever killed Diana.”
Are there honestly still people who believe it was anything other than an accident??
Originally Posted by Verence:
“Are there honestly still people who believe it was anything other than an accident??”
“Are there honestly still people who believe it was anything other than an accident??”
Are there still people who believe it was an accident ?
Originally Posted by Nosedive:
“He did, he wrote two books about it. There was a massive uproar about it in the early noughties.”
“He did, he wrote two books about it. There was a massive uproar about it in the early noughties.”
Blimey, you think he revealed anything really juicy?!!
Originally Posted by tofty1:
“Are there still people who believe it was an accident ?”
“Are there still people who believe it was an accident ?”
Have you seen Unlawful Killing? A must watch for anyone imo, even complete sceptics came out of screenings gobsmacked. You have to search online for it as it was suppressed.
Originally Posted by paralax:
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
He has done that already.
I wasn't in any way surprised by the boos either.
Originally Posted by nattoyaki:
“Have you seen Unlawful Killing? A must watch for anyone imo, even complete sceptics came out of screenings gobsmacked. You have to search online for it as it was suppressed.”
“Have you seen Unlawful Killing? A must watch for anyone imo, even complete sceptics came out of screenings gobsmacked. You have to search online for it as it was suppressed.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1vdw633QkM
Not that suppressed...
Originally Posted by Jim_Bob5:
“The British public don't like the man.”
“The British public don't like the man.”
Excuse me . I like the man . He has been more sinned against than a sinner . Some nasty comments here without foundation .
Originally Posted by lazylegs:
“Excuse me . I like the man . He has been more sinned against than a sinner . Some nasty comments here without foundation .”
“Excuse me . I like the man . He has been more sinned against than a sinner . Some nasty comments here without foundation .”
I totally agree with you. There are some very ignorance comments about this.
Originally Posted by paralax:
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
“He didn't steal anything, she gave him things to look after, boxes that had letters, diaries and tapes. The royals knew it and never said a word, until he was about to take the stand in his defence. They knew he might have to answer questions that would be embarrassing to them.
He knows a lot of their secrets and could probably make a fortune selling them if he chose.”
The law were brought in by Diana family not the Royals. Royal family weren't too bothered until they learnt while court case was underway what 'could' be revealed. Diana parentage via DNA. Look up who her mother was having an affair with in 1960. Enough to get Queen to intervene. Diana not aristocracy after all!
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“The law were brought in by Diana family not the Royals. Royal family weren't too bothered until they learnt while court case was underway what 'could' be revealed. Diana parentage via DNA. Look up who her mother was having an affair with in 1960. Enough to get Queen to intervene. Diana not aristocracy after all!”
“The law were brought in by Diana family not the Royals. Royal family weren't too bothered until they learnt while court case was underway what 'could' be revealed. Diana parentage via DNA. Look up who her mother was having an affair with in 1960. Enough to get Queen to intervene. Diana not aristocracy after all!”
Ooh got a link?
