|
||||||||
Paul Burrell is a vile, despicable man! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
Fair play to him, Diana was a cheat sod her.
she did court publicity and a celebrity lifestyle, she used the boys at times to score public points (against Charles), and cheated with married men. She has a virtues but she also had many faults. Sorry just my personal views.![]() Diana confided and admired Paul and I'm sure she herself would encourage such/some 'leaks' if it resulted in a favourable public outcome for herself in contrast to the royals. Diana was very bright. Rip
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,694
|
Quote:
Are you for real?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
No, he will just be content to polish them up a bit.
![]() ![]() I just think he's pompous and posh really, it just seems 'camp'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
The Royal Family makes my blood boil.
![]() ![]() This place is tame when compared to the dailymail comments section when discussing royal articles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,694
|
Quote:
and cheated with married men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
I don't know much about Paul but I do detect a sadness in his eyes and an air of desperation about him.
Quote:
Apparently hundreds of items, including some of Diana's designer dresses if I recall correctly.
can't see it myself, they just wanted to.publicly hang him after turning Diana into a pubic saint.Quote:
He has made mistakes and may not have been the most loyal person he made himself to be but the world he served and worked for do not seem to be the most up right people and the media establishment that reported his wrong doings to the public are far from clean people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
Do you watch rugby
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
I admired Diana in many ways, but I must agree they do rewrite history following someone's death.
she did court publicity and a celebrity lifestyle, she used the boys at times to score public points (against Charles), and cheated with married men. She has a virtues but she also had many faults. Sorry just my personal views.![]() Diana confided and admired Paul and I'm sure she herself would encourage such/some 'leaks' if it resulted in a favourable public outcome for herself in contrast to the royals. Diana was very bright. Rip
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Newport Pagnell
Posts: 21,352
|
The trouble is that it's no good just blaming Paul Burrell because without the media he couldn't have done it, made money and "exploited" his Diana connection as much as he has done. The press, publishers and now Channel 5 with CBB are more than keen to pay him money for articles, books and now to appear on this latest show. Eighteen years to the week after she passed away I would have thought he had diminished his returns to almost nothing by now and am surprised he's popped up on this CBB if I'm honest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
Oh I know, Diana was definitely no saint and I agree with you on that. I just find it disgusting that Paul has cashed in on her death to the extent that he has. He has made a lot of money from her demise, and it doesn't sit right with me. Understandably he may have lost a lot of respect for certain members of the royal family, however he should have thought about her two boys (who were still fairly young at the time) before leaking revelations about Diana's private life. And he's still milking it today.
![]() I think on their part Paul should have had more consideration, but maybe he felt a duty as her friend to make public what the royals were trying to in a sense hide ie her distress, eating issues etc. Who knows but it comes across no matter his reasoning as him being disloyal and selling Diana out and I don't think he understands that's the public's General consensus regarding him evident by his surprise at the boos. I remember a story about William passing a tissue to his mum under a bathroom door when she was crying.....how sad. Understandably their is a line and Paul crossed it sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28,957
|
Quote:
The trouble is that it's no good just blaming Paul Burrell because without the media he couldn't have done it, made money and "exploited" his Diana connection as much as he has done. The press, publishers and now Channel 5 with CBB are more than keen to pay him money for articles, books and now to appear on this latest show. Eighteen years to the week after she passed away I would have thought he had diminished his returns to almost nothing by now and am surprised he's popped up on this CBB if I'm honest.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Newport Pagnell
Posts: 21,352
|
Did anyone believe his Queen and her crown in the bedroom story tonight on his VT before he went in? He said "I once went into the Queen's bedroom and caught her wearing her crown, and when I looked down she was wearing fluffy red slippers".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,188
|
Quote:
Did anyone believe his Queen and her crown in the bedroom story tonight on his VT before he went in? He said "I once went into the Queen's bedroom and caught her wearing her crown, and when I looked down she was wearing fluffy red slippers".
If he'd made up a little story about, say, Katie Price, I'm sure there would be a twitter war between them over it which would be covered in the Daily Star the day after. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Newport Pagnell
Posts: 21,352
|
Quote:
Aren't the crown jewels kept at the Tower of London? I'm pretty sure it was bullshit. He knows not many people are going to question him if he makes up little titbits like that. It's not as if the Queen is going to lower herself to deny Paul Burrell's little stories on CBB.
If he'd made up a little story about, say, Katie Price, I'm sure there would be a twitter war between them over it which would be covered in the Daily Star the day after. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,620
|
I like the guy. Don't forget Diana herself was very clever at working the media.....I don't think she would be too pushed about what he has done in the years since she died.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Newport Pagnell
Posts: 21,352
|
Quote:
I like the guy. Don't forget Diana herself was very clever at working the media.....I don't think she would be too pushed about what he has done in the years since she died.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,744
|
mmh, you lost me at 'vile' and 'despicable', I'm afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,694
|
Quote:
Do you watch rugby
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,531
|
Quote:
Spreadable, very spreadable was our Diana as a famous rugby player can vouch for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 2,403
|
I think it's disgusting him.coming on a day after the anniversary of her death. No sensitivity from C5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,749
|
Quote:
I think the tide is turning with views on the royal family
![]() This place is tame when compared to the dailymail comments section when discussing royal articles. ![]() I hate everything about them. To me they are nothing more than self serving parasites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
|
Quote:
And Charles wasn't ? I'm willing to bet that she wouldn't have been seeing any other men at all if she hadn't been tricked into being Charle's and Camilla's cover for their ever ongoing affair.
Otherwise Paul Burrell is just there for the money, let's face it no one else is offering him some. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
I think it's disgusting him.coming on a day after the anniversary of her death. No sensitivity from C5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,714
|
His undying loyalty to the royals has always irked me. They treated him like absolute shit, and were prepared to see him sent to prison until the Queen suddenly remember that she indeed had asked him to look Diana's things, just as he was about to take to the witness stand as well. How very convenient
![]() He knows far too much about them, and they know it. I'm just amazed someone hasn't tried to pop him off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hayling Island.
Posts: 2,981
|
Quote:
And Charles wasn't ? I'm willing to bet that she wouldn't have been seeing any other men at all if she hadn't been tricked into being Charle's and Camilla's cover for their ever ongoing affair.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:12.



she did court publicity and a celebrity lifestyle, she used the boys at times to score public points (against Charles), and cheated with married men. She has a virtues but she also had many faults. Sorry just my personal views.
Diana was very bright. Rip




I think on their part Paul should have had more consideration, but maybe he felt a duty as her friend to make public what the royals were trying to in a sense hide ie her distress, eating issues etc. Who knows but it comes across no matter his reasoning as him being disloyal and selling Diana out and I don't think he understands that's the public's General consensus regarding him evident by his surprise at the boos. I remember a story about William passing a tissue to his mum under a bathroom door when she was crying.....how sad. Understandably their is a line and Paul crossed it sometimes.
