Originally Posted by Stuart25:
“Seriously? It's been a year!! Look, I liked Pixie last year, but if you just took a look at Twitter, Facebook, Daily Mail etc. she didn't have a lot of support, and that's probably why she ended up in the dance off. The dance off itself was extremely close and I'd have been pushed to vote for either of them; looking back I'd say Simon's was the better dance, but Pixie had been a fantastic dancer up to that point.
It's done and dusted. Move on.”
“Seriously? It's been a year!! Look, I liked Pixie last year, but if you just took a look at Twitter, Facebook, Daily Mail etc. she didn't have a lot of support, and that's probably why she ended up in the dance off. The dance off itself was extremely close and I'd have been pushed to vote for either of them; looking back I'd say Simon's was the better dance, but Pixie had been a fantastic dancer up to that point.
It's done and dusted. Move on.”
Baffles me why so many people buy the daily mail, either their right wing conservatives or they just believe the articles. I think the daily mail are the most manipulative paper of all and are very crafty with hand picking what they want to put in the articles.
Strikes me that the presenters like shocks as well as they think it keeps it interesting, not really IMHO. Seems to me that certain viewers instead of thinking it's a dance competition think it's a game show instead and will vote like it's a game show as well. Trouble is it cheapens scd really.



