• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Bobby Davro explains he would never be horrible to anyone...
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Emma-in-Hants
10-09-2015
... right after his Farrah nomination.


Turns out he is a comedian after all.
Wainy84
10-09-2015
Was never a Davro fan.
loopyluna
10-09-2015
I was more interested to hear more of Gails' comments about his behaviour in the royals task, team USA eluded to it but we never seen anything in the HL show.
SnowStorm86
10-09-2015
I quite like him. He doesn't suffer fools lightly as we saw during his nominations.
rhizo_mania
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by loopyluna:
“I was more interested to hear more of Gails' comments about his behaviour in the royals task, team USA eluded to it but we never seen anything in the HL show.”


So much is not shown to protect the people they want to protect.
Wainy84
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by SnowStorm86:
“I quite like him. He doesn't suffer fools lightly as we saw during his nominations.”

In that case I thought he would nom Sherrie.
ShadowTillNow
10-09-2015
There's not a single other person in there that had a big enough cock to say that to Farrah and she certainly deserved to hear it. I'm not for or against Bobby either way, but he didn't pussy out like so many of them.
Deb Arkle
10-09-2015
....not horrible to anyone? So what does he call shagging his disabled friend's wife - charity?
rolergirl
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by ShadowTillNow:
“There's not a single other person in there that had a big enough cock to say that to Farrah and she certainly deserved to hear it. I'm not for or against Bobby either way, but he didn't pussy out like so many of them.”

i think it was completely cowardly, he only did it when he knew he'd have silence and an audience, he didnt go to her face to face and say it, no,h e did it with all the back up of everyone around him and used nominations to launch a verbal attack and because e knows shes unpopular, night before he said he had no problem with her!
annai
10-09-2015
He really is quite a passive aggresive and patronising man in my opinion. How can he say that he didn't show his anger during nominations when you could practically see steam coming out of his ears.
annai
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“i think it was completely cowardly, he only did it when he knew he'd have silence and an audience, he didnt go to her face to face and say it, no,h e did it with all the back up of everyone around him and used nominations to launch a verbal attack and because e knows shes unpopular, night before he said he had no problem with her!”

Well said.
danyell
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by annai:
“He really is quite a passive aggresive and patronising man in my opinion. How can he say that he didn't show his anger during nominations when you could practically see steam coming out of his ears.”

His passive aggressiveness in his nomination made it worse in a way. If Bobby lost it and started shouting I would of understood, as someone like Farrah really could push you to your limit. But he said it so calmly like he was enjoying humiliating her. It came across rather sadistic in my opinion.
Astute
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by ShadowTillNow:
“There's not a single other person in there that had a big enough cock to say that to Farrah and she certainly deserved to hear it. I'm not for or against Bobby either way, but he didn't pussy out like so many of them.”

James tried in a more rational way
Farrah needed to hear the truth . Maybe not in this way.

But please don't kid yourself though that he(B) did it as " a favour " to anyone but himself .
This was calculated grandstanding and only had the guts to do it after the booing .
This was to boost HIS profile in the house i.e. speaking on behalf of the public - very much in the way Jack Mc Dermott thought he was doing after he got the "public vote" as the most popular HM

Like I said in another post : Davro and Jan-arse are the biggest players there - followed closely by a fast-learning Chloe

Its about camera -time and sound-bites whereas Farrah's "attacks" are visceral and reactive - well...most of the time
Fanntastik
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“i think it was completely cowardly, he only did it when he knew he'd have silence and an audience, he didnt go to her face to face and say it, no,h e did it with all the back up of everyone around him and used nominations to launch a verbal attack and because e knows shes unpopular, night before he said he had no problem with her!”

Well said.
strato222
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by loopyluna:
“I was more interested to hear more of Gails' comments about his behaviour in the royals task, team USA eluded to it but we never seen anything in the HL show.”

So, why do Gail and team US only elude to it? Maybe it's because they're making something out of nothing. Bobby was just having fun with the task.
Fanntastik
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by strato222:
“So, why do Gail and team US only elude to it? Maybe it's because they're making something out of nothing. Bobby was just having fun with the task.”

"only" Gail and team US? That's half the house alluding to Bobby's behaviour.
Deb Arkle
10-09-2015
Sorry to be a grammar nazi & all that...but it's "alluding", people!
Fanntastik
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by Deb Arkle:
“Sorry to be a grammar nazi & all that...but it's "alluding", people! ”

Fixed!
Deb Arkle
10-09-2015
Thanks, it was aggravating my CDO (that's like OCD, but alphabetical...as it should be)
Ketamine
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“i think it was completely cowardly, he only did it when he knew he'd have silence and an audience, he didnt go to her face to face and say it, no,h e did it with all the back up of everyone around him and used nominations to launch a verbal attack and because e knows shes unpopular, night before he said he had no problem with her!”

This is completely devoid of logic. He stood up in front of everyone and said straight to her face the truth, and its cowardly!?

No being cowardly would be just keeping his mouth shut for an easy life, like Sherie.
xynaria
10-09-2015
Let me explain why I would never be horrible to Bobby Davro......................................




Truth Teller
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“i think it was completely cowardly, he only did it when he knew he'd have silence and an audience, he didnt go to her face to face and say it, no, he did it with all the back up of everyone around him and used nominations to launch a verbal attack and because he knows shes unpopular, night before he said he had no problem with her!”

I have to say if everyone puts aside feelings they may have of Farrah, having rewatched Bobby's nomination and looking at his words & behaviour - your post is right. Bobby tonight is apparently explaining his reasons for annihilating Farrah. Looks like he knows it may look bad - his words were very very nasty for a gameshow esp. as she couldn't really reply. If they had gone head to head I wonder if he would have said the same things. It kind of showed a not very nice side to him.

She is one tough cookie though.
rhizo_mania
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by Ketamine:
“This is completely devoid of logic. He stood up in front of everyone and said straight to her face the truth, and its cowardly!?

No being cowardly would be just keeping his mouth shut for an easy life, like Sherie.”


I believe it was more grandstanding of cause he was going to nominate her and have a go, but it was on hearing the crowd chanting and booing that made Davro think he could really go in on her, he thought he had the public's blessing to say what he wanted but he should remember no one has 100% of the public on side.
strato222
10-09-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“"only" Gail and team US? That's half the house alluding to Bobby's behaviour.”

The point I'm trying to make is they only ELUDE to this behaviour rather than be specific. This tells me that they're trying to make something out of nothing. It's understandable that the Americans needed to make something out of nothing, but Gail?
Deb Arkle
10-09-2015
Your capitalization made me LOL, Strato!
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map