I don't see the "cowardly" thing. Farrah is unable to hear criticism in any way. The only time possible to say what you want to her is when she's required to keep her rubber lips shut. At any other time she would have just started screaming and left the room - that's what she's done every time she's been in an argument since going in. And to add to that, she's always had the added grown-ass-woman support of Jenna to back her up.

Nominations gave Bobby an opportunity that he otherwise would never have gotten. There's no face to face with Farrah - she's too stupid to hold a conversation anyway - so I can totally understand why he seized the moment.

Exactly. It was cowardly because he used the relative safety of nominations to launch his venomous attack. He also used Gail and the pretense that he was trying to "help" Farrah to disguise his cowardly verbal assualt. The truth is Bobby wanted revenge and to grandstand for the public, make himself look the hero by defeating the supposed "villain" of the show. It was a coldly calculated move by a very shrewd and heartless man.

So it wouldn't have been safe to say it any other time? What would have happened?

Oh, come on. You ruined my mental image of Gail and the American housemates bobbing around behind the furniture, while Bobby was a total ass during the "royalty" task.

"The" truth? Or his and your opinion? You do know the difference in the two don't you?

Fact is, Sir Bobby just doesn't have the courage to have said it at any other time. Hence the "cowardly" label.

Believe what you want. When you talk of past events at which they were all present, do you stop first and explain in detail what happened at that event, or do you just allude to it?

But sure, "The Americans" of course being so vile, would have no compunction about making something up out of nothing to make sweet Bobby look bad. But Saint Gail? Oh, my no. Give me a break.

Sorry Deb
I really must try harder

When you give your opinion you can still be lying or telling the truth. You did know know that didn't you?

It's only your truth, not a universal one.

Both Daniel and Paul talked about how hard the "royals" had made them work during the task. Jenna and Farrah talked about it in the bedroom, and then of course Gail mentioned it in her nomination of Bobby.

I don't know if their making something out of nothing as i haven't seen anything in the HL show. I was just curious to know if anyone else had noticed anything.

*Nazi

What is is this, the philosophy forum.

He said he had never met anyone with so much nastiness in them (or something like that). In my opinion, i think he was being truthful.

Well it's in her own hands not to be unpopular. There's only Jenna who can seem to tolerate her. Regarding WHEN he decided to tell her what he thought of her, it was probably the only time ANYONE would have had the chance to get a word in.

As far as I'm concerned she's a complete nightmare and had it coming. Bobby was simply braver than the rest of them.

He doesn't know what she has in her. He can't.

He could have said he's never met anyone he thought was as nasty as she is, and it could be true, though debatable.

How naive. You mean, you don't think that Austin, on the first night, going around and whispering to everyone about how vile she was, didn't color their opinions of her? Which gave Natasha free reign to be nasty towards her, to which she reacted. You don't think the constant hatchet job that the show does on her colors the audience's opinion?

Oh, brave, brave Bobby. Speaking up for the sheeple of the nation.

I thought he was quite nasty, there was no need for all that shite that rolled out of his mouth.

How quaint. I didn't know people still said sheeple.

To be honest if my only information about Farrah before seeing her for myself, was that she cared for orphaned children and sick animals, I would still hold the opinion I have of her.

Or do you think (for some weird reason) that she's pretending to be vile?

Oh, so terribly sorry, old chap. Is my verbiage too antiquated for you, you hip and happening old thing, you.

To be honest, I don't think she's vile. Does she react badly? Sure. Did she have reason to be upset with the people she was reacting to? Sure. Not sure why one that makes the one reacting vile, but the one who created the offense it just fine. As it seems to with you. But it doesn't to me.