|
||||||||
Aldi 4K TV for £299.99 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
Aldi 4K TV for £299.99
It has the usual 3-year guarantee, but the refresh rate is only 60Hz. How important is this in the real world, rather than to the techie-trainspotter types?
http://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuys...k-ultra-hd-tv/ |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 6,462
|
It does tend to make motion less blurry on LED TVs. I'm not sure whether that's the main issue though. A Blaupunkt/Bush/Techwood or other supermarket/no name 40" TV will be around the £220-£250. Most of those will be 50 or 60Hz refresh as well and have just a 12 month warranty. This is the same screen size and with an extra 2 yrs warranty and it's 4K. How many other corners besides higher refresh rate do you think might have been cut to pay for the 4K screen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
I've heard that the onboard sound isn't up there with the best, but that's no problem if you already have a sound bar. I noticed that it has a LAN connection, but what's the purpose of that if it's not a smart TV? With a 3-year guarantee it doesn't seem too much of a risk at that price. After reading reviews of what Aldi are selling elsewhere I'm guessing it's a Bauhn model, but I don't know anything about those – not that it really matters, as most TVs seem to have the same components these days.
Edit: after checking the Bauhn website, they don't seem to do a 40" 4K TV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,797
|
I went to Aldi the other week to get one of the notebooks they had advertised.
Got there 5 mins to 8am. was the only person there for the note book, and they only had ONE in the store, which thankfully I got. I'm not sure if they'll have many TVs either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,008
|
But as has been said before as the 4K broadcast spec has not been finalised it is rather pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,469
|
Remember the old saying, "Buy cheap buy twice". What do you think you will get for that price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
Quote:
Remember the old saying, "Buy cheap buy twice". What do you think you will get for that price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,103
|
Quote:
A 40" 4K TV with a 3-year guarantee for £299.99. The refresh rate is the only thing that concerns me, although I can't imagine that anybody would go to the trouble of making one if its refresh rate made it unwatchable.
If no to any of the above if will be very limited in what 4k it will show, ie, no Netflix, Amazon (if/ever available via dedicated app) or UHD bluray/broadcasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Quote:
Edit: after checking the Bauhn website, they don't seem to do a 40" 4K TV.
https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...k-ultra-hd-tv/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
The sticker on the power consumption label says Bauhn. But isn't Bauhn just Aldi's own brand, so could be made by anyone?
https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...k-ultra-hd-tv/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,196
|
Have you read the review?
★★★★★ ★★★★★ 1 out of 5 stars. Zaxx · 15 hours ago Absolute rubbish It is absolute rubbish.... ✘ No, I do not recommend this product. 31 people found this review helpful.61 people did not find this review helpful. Helpful? Yes · 31 31 people found this review helpful. Click to agree.No · 61 61 people did not find this review helpful. Click to agree.Report Response from Aldi Stores Limited: Catrina · CSD · 3 hours ago Hi Zaxx. Thank you for your rating and review. We are sorry to hear about your experience with our 40" 4K Ultra HD TV. We have taken on board your comments and logged them for the Buying team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,797
|
Quote:
Have you read the review?
★★★★★ ★★★★★ 1 out of 5 stars. Zaxx · 15 hours ago Absolute rubbish It is absolute rubbish..... I'm sure they are correct but some people might not mind the reasons why they didn't like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,450
|
I wouldn't bother, just save a few hundred more and buy a better one, and that's my opinion BEFORE I even read the one (and only) review on the website, which as above says "it's absolute rubbish"! Not very promising I'd say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,839
|
I've looked at some of the other cheaper 4k options and found the cheapest brand name one to be a Panasonic from Currys PC World for £459.
This has a refresh rate of 200 Hz, but some of the reviews on that mention on other websites mention motion lag on any high speed movement, as well as blurring. Also not all 4k TVs on offer are actually 4k, but UHD http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/fea...po8QCitkzN3LZY |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4
|
I bought one today on the off chance that the Ethernet port would allow me to watch movies located on my pc but I returned it as this was not possible and I couldn't work out why the port was included as even the manual made no mention of its purpose.
It is a bauhn tv for what it's worth. No smart features. I noticed the sound was a bit tinny even for a fairly slim tv. I also thought that while the picture was pretty crisp on standard hd, there was a kind of washed out pink hue to the picture although that could have been some thing that could be corrected by adjusting setting. Don't know what the 4k was Like as I don't have any 4k media. The one and only review mentioned a few posts above was actuality made before the tv was available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
I bought one today on the off chance that the Ethernet port would allow me to watch movies located on my pc but I returned it as this was not possible and I couldn't work out why the port was included as even the manual made no mention of its purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,450
|
Quote:
I bought one today on the off chance that the Ethernet port would allow me to watch movies located on my pc but I returned it as this was not possible and I couldn't work out why the port was included as even the manual made no mention of its purpose.
It is a bauhn tv for what it's worth. No smart features. I noticed the sound was a bit tinny even for a fairly slim tv. I also thought that while the picture was pretty crisp on standard hd, there was a kind of washed out pink hue to the picture although that could have been some thing that could be corrected by adjusting setting. Don't know what the 4k was Like as I don't have any 4k media. The one and only review mentioned a few posts above was actuality made before the tv was available. ![]() Don't get me wrong, might be good for a second bedroom TV or something, but not a everyday living room one |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
Quote:
Have you read the review?
★★★★★ ★★★★★ 1 out of 5 stars. Zaxx · 15 hours ago Absolute rubbish It is absolute rubbish.... ![]() I'll wait until there are a few more before reaching any conclusions. It seems odd that somebody else reviewed in when they hadn't even looked at the menu. In my experience, most TVs are appalling when viewed in their original factory settings. I'm slightly more concerned about the sound; I wouldn't need it produce massive volume, but a nicely balanced tone is important. I don't have a sound bar and it would partly cancel out the low price if it was necessary to buy one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
But as has been said before as the 4K broadcast spec has not been finalised it is rather pointless.
Almost all the 4K in the immediate future will be streamed content from a provider like BT, Netflix, Amazon Prime etc or possibly a Sky 4K/Virgin 4K box, none of which require integrated 4K tuners in the TV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
I bought one today on the off chance that the Ethernet port would allow me to watch movies located on my pc but I returned it as this was not possible and I couldn't work out why the port was included as even the manual made no mention of its purpose.
It is a bauhn tv for what it's worth. No smart features. I noticed the sound was a bit tinny even for a fairly slim tv. I also thought that while the picture was pretty crisp on standard hd, there was a kind of washed out pink hue to the picture although that could have been some thing that could be corrected by adjusting setting. Don't know what the 4k was Like as I don't have any 4k media. The one and only review mentioned a few posts above was actuality made before the tv was available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,839
|
Quote:
You might have been wise to wait a little longer, rather than relying on a review written before it was even available.
![]() I'll wait until there are a few more before reaching any conclusions. It seems odd that somebody else reviewed in when they hadn't even looked at the menu. In my experience, most TVs are appalling when viewed in their original factory settings. I'm slightly more concerned about the sound; I wouldn't need it produce massive volume, but a nicely balanced tone is important. I don't have a sound bar and it would partly cancel out the low price if it was necessary to buy one. It's worth reading this DS article of 4k TVs It says that unless your TV is due for retirement, it's best to wait until the main broadcasters/sky get on board with 4k, along with TV's that have built in DVB-UHDTV tuners. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,450
|
So there's "4k ready" and "full 4k" TVs? I thought they were either "4k" meaning full 4k or "UHD" or "SUHD", they all mean the same thing no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
Quote:
I doubt very much whether the on Aldi have on offer is the full 4k TV anyhow, much in the way you can get HD and Full HD TVs
Quote from TechRadar: Quote:
Difference between Ultra HD and 4K
Technically, "Ultra High Definition" is actually a derivation of the 4K digital cinema standard. However while your local multiplex shows images in native 4096 x 2160 4K resolution, the new Ultra HD consumer format has a slightly lower resolution of 3840 X 2160. This is one reason why some brands prefer not to use the 4K label at all, sticking with Ultra HD or UHD instead. However, the numerical shorthand looks likely to stick. As a broad brush label it's so much snappier! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,469
|
It would have been better if Tech Radar had done some basic research by looking up current feature films on IMDb. Most films are still released from a 2K digital intermediate with a resolution of 2048X1080 and will not be re post produced in 4K. Most will be shot "shoot and protect for HD TV release" so can be shown in HD by simply trimming the width by about 128 pixels to that format without loss of required picture information or resolution. Some cinema projectors upscale to 4K.
This site shows the current releases in 4K by Sony Pictures. http://www.sony.co.uk/pro/products/d...movie-releases |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 4,536
|
I'm slightly at a loss as to why anyone would want a 40" 4k display, even assuming it was a good quality one.
Just how close to a bog standard 40" full HD screen would you have to sit in order to find it lacking in resolution? Probably too close for comfort.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51.




