Originally Posted by Anne_Cameron:
“I thought Carla told Michelle that her solicitor had sorted all the paperwork and it was a done deal. Michelle was effusive in her thanks for what Carla had done.”
Originally Posted by Jazbaa1:
“You'd think someone would have at least mentioned it! After all, it is what drove Tracy to let herself into Carla's flat that night with the intention of killing her.
The writers didn't need to make a big deal about it but they should have made it crystal clear from the start that nothing had been signed and that there had been a change of plan. That's all.”
Quote:
“22nd May - Carla buys Liz McDonald's share of the Rovers, unwittingly cutting the ground from under Tracy Barlow's feet and putting an end to her and Tony's scheme to con Liz out of the Rovers. She threatens revenge.”
http://coronationstreet.wikia.com/wiki/2015
Quote:
“Coronation Street: Carla buys into the Rovers - and leaves Tony stunned!”
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-...the-full-scene
The whole thing was played as if Carla had bought the Rovers. In the prog, it was never said she was
buying the Rovers. She had
bought the Rovers.
Then weeks after Liz dropped her bombshell when she talked about protecting her interests. There has never been a conversation to say that the that the deal didn't go through.
After Liz's comment, Corrie may well say Carla didn't buy the Rovers and Liz still owns her share but that was never made clear in the prog. All the conversations talked about the purchase as though it had been done and dusted.
All the fuss that Carla had bought the Rovers was rubbish then? Carla was
buying the Rovers. Nothing signed and sealed. The whole thing was an ambiguous plot device so that Tracy could pop round to Carla's to start the fire.
This is just like when David adopted Max. Except he didn't.