• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
CS: Have Corrie forgetten Carla owns half of the rovers?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
MODTL
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by ewoodie:
“Wiki can be edited by anyone!”

I edited it using this as a source as it came directly from ITV's David Nugent. I had grown sick and tired of reading unsourced and blatant fantasies on there which involved Nick buying it and making Sarah the landlady or Carla installing David and Kylie as licensees. So when I found the below info on CoronationStreetBlog I changed Wiki and sourced it

Quote:
“"Liz paid off the debts Steve had run up using Street Cars money. Steve then had a huge tax bill, which Tony paid off. He then also agreed to help pay for the wedding. Tony then pretended that all this strain on his finances had forced him into dodgy deals with loan sharks who were now threatening him with violence if he did not pay them back. Steve sold his half of the Rovers to Travis Ltd. (Tony's bogus company). Steve gave the proceeds to Tony, who effectively paid himself! Liz was about to sell her half of the Rovers to Carla but before they could sign on the dotted line, she learned of Tony's plan to get the pub. Therefore, Liz still owns her half of the pub, while Tony owns the other half."

So there you have it straight from the studio. Liz does still own half of the pub and Tony owns the other half at the moment. We do know that Liz is trying to keep Tony out of it and we've suspected that she'll get back together with Tony only to get Steve's share back for him somehow.”

ewoodie
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by MODTL:
“I edited it using this as a source.”




Well done you!

But. Oh. Quelle surprise! Who would have guessed? Yet another cop out from Corrie and that bloke David Nugent. The man who said David didn't adopt Max.

Nothing was ever said to that effect that Carla hadn't bought the Rovers until Liz said months later that her was protecting her interests. At the time the whole thing was presented that Carla had bought the Rovers. Bought. Not buying.

If Carla was in the process of buying the Rovers none of this was really clarified at the time. It was shown and presented like it was a done deal and she had bought the Rovers.

This discussion has highlighted not who amongst us is right or wrong. The real issue is with Corrie. Corrie never made it clear what happened. This was probably to get a bigger effect for their SL. They chose to hoodwink/dupe the audience by suggesting Carla had actually bought the Rovers for a bigger impetus when Tracy popped round to start the fire.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map