• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Natasha should sue
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
bunnyinthebox
14-09-2015
I think 'Tash would have a good case to sue Farrah for calling her a whore on national TV.
Norn2
14-09-2015
deana couldn't sue the vile connor when he threatened to shove an epilator up her vag.
so i doubt natasha has any chance
SULLA
14-09-2015
I am guessing that they all have to sign ' No sue' contracts
xynaria
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by Norn2:
“deana couldn't sue the vile connor when he threatened to shove an epilator up her vag. ”

Wtf!!!!! I missed that series..how the hell did that transpire????
Norn2
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by xynaria:
“Wtf!!!!! I missed that series..how the hell did that transpire????”

it was the bitchiest season EVER! connor had a obsession with the housemate deana. he said in his interview he hated her because she was boring. which was a weird reason. but after seeing his racist tweets after his bb appearence, it seemed clear that he hated her because she was indian.

basically he was constantly bitching about her and that's one of the things he said.
HailHenrik
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by bunnyinthebox:
“I think 'Tash would have a good case to sue Farrah for calling her a whore on national TV.”

LOL. Of course she wouldn't.
An Thropologist
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“I am guessing that they all have to sign ' No sue' contracts”

That will explain why we haven't ever had a housemate called Sue.

This thread is going to be a doozy I feel it in my water. If it weren't 2.20am I would be getting the popcorn out and be settlng in for a lurk.
Stupid_Head
14-09-2015
Firstly she needs to sue her make up artist for giving her those Maccy D's eyebrows.
3rd World Disco
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by Stupid_Head:
“Firstly she needs to sue her make up artist for giving her those Maccy D's eyebrows.”

She'll just have a drink first. I'm sure she put something aside.
Penny Crayon
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by Stupid_Head:
“Firstly she needs to sue her make up artist for giving her those Maccy D's eyebrows.”

ROFL

Did you think that one up all on your own?
annw
14-09-2015
is this a joke. what about what natasha as said about farrah. lying about her and calling her a c**t, oh sorry only farrah gets called out.
hendoll
14-09-2015
What the hell are maccy D eyebrows? Oh I feel so out of touch
JCR
14-09-2015
British libel judgements aren't enforceable against citizens of the USA.
EnricoIV
14-09-2015
"Tash would have to prove that what "Rah said is not true. What about things that 'Ust has said about Farrah. What about the things that "Obb has said about both of them.
An Thropologist
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“"Tash would have to prove that what "Rah said is not true. What about things that 'Ust has said about Farrah. What about the things that "Obb has said about both of them.”

Not in civil law. The respondent would have to stand up their comments. But its academic because common or garden name calling wouldn't qualify as malicious falsehood, which is what I guess you would have to bring the claim under. It would be stuck out before it got to court.
HaloJoe
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“That will explain why we haven't ever had a housemate called Sue.

This thread is going to be a doozy I feel it in my water. If it weren't 2.20am I would be getting the popcorn out and be settlng in for a lurk.”

I lol'd
The_Sleeper
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by HaloJoe:
“I lol'd ”

Thats not like you......... Babe
HaloJoe
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by The_Sleeper:
“Thats not like you......... Babe ”

You should be asleep, sleeps babe
rhizo_mania
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by hendoll:
“What the hell are maccy D eyebrows? Oh I feel so out of touch ”


Natasha's eyebrows resemble the McDonald's golden archers,

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...D4DDMfHmxNDehg
SegaGamer
14-09-2015
If she tried to sue someone for that, it would get laughed out of court.
HaloJoe
14-09-2015
She could take the case to Judge Rinder
bunnyinthebox
14-09-2015
OK so apparently it would not stand up in court and even if it did it would not be enforceable against a US citizen.

I doubt 'Tash give's a toss what Farrah's opinion is on anything.

I do however think that using the word 'whore' to insult someone is demeaning to sex workers.
bunnyinthebox
14-09-2015
Originally Posted by rhizo_mania:
“Natasha's eyebrows resemble the McDonald's golden archers,

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...D4DDMfHmxNDehg”

As does the profile of Jenna's backside when she lies on her stomach, known in the porno biz as the McDonald's shot.
CLL Dodge
14-09-2015
Would probably have gotten Farrah a temporary ban on the DS forum.

BB are more lenient.
GTR Davo
14-09-2015
She's just exercising her first amendment right to free speech
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map