Originally Posted by Supersarahp:
“Why are only some Hms on the list? Mine would be sherriie”
“Why are only some Hms on the list? Mine would be sherriie”
Oh yes I forgot her,she has disappointed me .
Results:Who would be your worst potential winner?
Austin
26 (15.76%)
Bobby
49 (29.70%)
James
27 (16.36%)
Janice
30 (18.18%)
Natasha
33 (20.00%)
Voters: 165. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Who would be your worst potential winner?
2 of 3
Originally Posted by Ketamine:
“This poll is shit, why not put all housemates on it?”
“This poll is shit, why not put all housemates on it?”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this
I kind of understand the choices because these 5 are the ones at the top of the bookies and everyone else judging by bookies has an outside chance of winning (despite Farrah being in the Top 5 in polls).
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“I kind of understand the choices because these 5 are the ones at the top of the bookies and everyone else judging by bookies has an outside chance of winning (despite Farrah being in the Top 5 in polls).
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win”
“I kind of understand the choices because these 5 are the ones at the top of the bookies and everyone else judging by bookies has an outside chance of winning (despite Farrah being in the Top 5 in polls).
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win”
Yeah but it's also a kind of subtle (even if not meant that way) nudge towards who to vote out if you want someone else to win.
Mind you, that's the smallest of gripes on this forum, was just making the point
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“I kind of understand the choices because these 5 are the ones at the top of the bookies and everyone else judging by bookies has an outside chance of winning (despite Farrah being in the Top 5 in polls).
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win”
“I kind of understand the choices because these 5 are the ones at the top of the bookies and everyone else judging by bookies has an outside chance of winning (despite Farrah being in the Top 5 in polls).
The OP obviously meant which of these favourites would you least like to win. Doesn't mean the others won't win, it just means pick between them because of their likeliness of winning over the others.
Its kind of in betting when they do a bookie "without the favourite", who else would you want to win”
Exactly what I meant.
Cheers Salv, explained it better than myself, aha.
But in future I'll make sure I include all the housemates.
Can honestly say I would not waste a penny voting for any left in that house.
Some are deadly boring, others just deadly.
Without doubt the worst gathering of 'has been' that CH5 have wasted money on.
Bad language, daily 'cat fighters' and gutter humour does not an entertaining show make.
Some are deadly boring, others just deadly.
Without doubt the worst gathering of 'has been' that CH5 have wasted money on.
Bad language, daily 'cat fighters' and gutter humour does not an entertaining show make.
Bobby. He seems like a decent enough bloke, but I kinda get the feeling he thought a win was a sure thing. I think he still does.
Bobby - a bitter, grudge-bearing pillock.
Really wouldn't want the ultra bitchy Austin to win either.
Really wouldn't want the ultra bitchy Austin to win either.
Originally Posted by wotnot:
“Bobby or Natasha, sorry couldn't vote as only one choice and I can't decide who I dislike most.”
“Bobby or Natasha, sorry couldn't vote as only one choice and I can't decide who I dislike most.”
This. Voted Bobby but dislike Natasha too.
Farrah - even though she's not included in the poll. After the awful Helen Wood, how can we say that no-one as nasty as her couldn't win?
Originally Posted by sutie:
“Farrah - even though she's not included in the poll. After the awful Helen Wood, how can we say that no-one as nasty as her couldn't win?”
“Farrah - even though she's not included in the poll. After the awful Helen Wood, how can we say that no-one as nasty as her couldn't win?”
i hated Helen with a passion on here (still do) but remember when i said it at the time on here, a lot were on her side as they hated Ashleigh, i dont think farah is anything as bad as her at all.
Out of that selection, Natasha.
I'd be quite happy for any of the others to win. All have done something to amuse me at some point.
Natasha's just too 'meh'.
I'd be quite happy for any of the others to win. All have done something to amuse me at some point.
Natasha's just too 'meh'.
Out of the options I voted Natasha, but Stevi/Chloe would be my nightmare. They'd never disappear! At least there's a good chance we'll never hear of them again after they're evicted.
Originally Posted by ageappropriate:
“Out of the options I voted Natasha, but Stevi/Chloe would be my nightmare. They'd never disappear! At least there's a good chance we'll never hear of them again after they're evicted.”
“Out of the options I voted Natasha, but Stevi/Chloe would be my nightmare. They'd never disappear! At least there's a good chance we'll never hear of them again after they're evicted.”
Next years Eurovision entry. I bet you!
2 of 3
