|
||||||||
Three beats EE to it with launch of UK's first VoLTE service |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 396
|
Three beats EE to it with launch of UK's first VoLTE service
Taken from http://m.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2425950/three-beats-ee-to-it-with-launch-of-uks-first-volte-serviceUK
MOBILE OPERATOR Three has beat rival EE to it with the launch of Voice over LTE (VoLTE), or 'Super-Voice' as the firm has decided to call it. Three's Super-Voice service will boost mobile coverage indoors and in rural locations by using low-frequency 800MHz spectrum which is better at penetrating buildings and can travel greater distances, according to the operator. Three claimed that its 800MHz network covers 50 percent of the population, including the majority of London, Edinburgh, Exeter and Birmingham. That figure is expected to jump to 65 percent by the end of the year as the firm extends to more towns and cities, including Cardiff, Manchester, Liverpool and Bristol. This doesn't mean that much of the population will be able to use Super-Voice just yet, however, as a VoLTE-compatible phone is need to take advantage. Three told us that the Samsung Galaxy S5, LG G4 and unspecified Xperia handsets will be the first to gain Super-Voice functionality at launch. Three said that new handsets will be added to its Super-Voice line-up regularly, including the new iPhone 6S and iPhone 6S Plus. The operator also told us that last year's iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus will receive support later in the year, and that more Android phones will be added within the next month. Three said it expects that up to 5.5 million customers could have access to 4G Super-Voice by 2017, subject to device compatibility and take up. Bryn Jones, chief technology officer at Three, added: "By the end of the year, one million of our customers will have access to better indoor coverage and be able to use their phones in more places than ever before. We are proud to be the first network to roll this out across the country." Three has beat its rivals to the punch, but EE and Vodafone are unlikely to be far behind as both have previously confirmed that a launch this summer was on the cards. No exact dates have been mentioned. EE and Vodafone have one up on Three when it comes to their respective WiFi calling apps, however, as Three's InTouch offering is unable to hand off between a mobile and WiFi connection. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
|
well to be fair a 41 page thread is a lot of stuff to search through so I thank him/her for the new thread.
Whats the advantage of volte? e.g. does 800mhz 4g have better penetration than 2g? does it have better battery life? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,694
|
Quote:
Whats the advantage of volte?
e.g. does 800mhz 4g have better penetration than 2g? does it have better battery life? Yes, on Three and EE at least 800 will reach further than 1800 and even 900 2G. Maybe, maybe not. It's a slow 4G data connection. Up to around 30Kbps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapti...-Rate_Wideband |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
Worse battery life currently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
AMR-WB (HD Voice) + more robust connection (hopefully).
Yes, on Three and EE at least 800 will reach further than 1800 and even 900 2G. Maybe, maybe not. It's a slow 4G data connection. Up to around 30Kbps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapti...-Rate_Wideband But imagine as Three seemed to have rushed this out then they have probably used normal HDVoice, |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
|
I just read it will need carrier specific software updates to phones, oh dear. It seems carriers want to use wifi calling and volte as lock ins to their devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
I wrote this to try and explain things as simple as possible (not sure I managed!)
http://jmcomms.com/2015/09/15/three-...e-limitations/ So far, as for the unconfirmed Xperia phones bit, on their blog they've ruled out the Z3 so I assume therefore it will ONLY be the Z5 family, and even then only the models Three ranges. So that effectively means anyone stumping up for the Z5 Premium will be stuffed. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,694
|
Quote:
VoLTE can use a higher quality codec than HDVoice I know for example AT&T are running a lower codec than T-Mobile US. Not sure about Verizon would need check.
But imagine as Three seemed to have rushed this out then they have probably used normal HDVoice, Standard WB is somewhere under 30Kbps I think. No idea which they are using. It'll be whatever they are using for WiFi Calling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
I'd guess that 3 will be using the same codec as "HD voice" (or the standard GSM codecs for non HD calls) to avoid the need to transcode to a different codec, which can be resource intensive, especially when you're having to do it thousands or millions of times simultaneously. If both ends of the call are on VoLTE or whatever, then they can use the best possible codec that both sides support
That's how it works with other voice/video over IP systems |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Posts: 744
|
Hi
Does Three have any plans of launching WiFi Calling, instead of having to use a Home Signal box? Thanks Baz |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,510
|
Quote:
Hi
Does Three have any plans of launching WiFi Calling, instead of having to use a Home Signal box? Thanks Baz If you mean natively, then not yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,694
|
They haven't said so (I don't think) but I'm sure they'll get around to it one day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
They haven't said so (I don't think) but I'm sure they'll get around to it one day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
They'll have to surely? There's talk of getting the app to work over 4G etc. but they should really be stopping work on that and going for proper wifi calling. Hopefully for PAYG customers too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 314
|
Doesn't VoLTE and Wifi Calling use basically the same technology? Surely if they support VoLTE then supporting Wifi Calling should be easier for them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kilburn, NW London
Posts: 1,240
|
Quote:
I wrote this to try and explain things as simple as possible (not sure I managed!)
http://jmcomms.com/2015/09/15/three-...e-limitations/ So far, as for the unconfirmed Xperia phones bit, on their blog they've ruled out the Z3 so I assume therefore it will ONLY be the Z5 family, and even then only the models Three ranges. So that effectively means anyone stumping up for the Z5 Premium will be stuffed. I get the feeling Three are slowly becoming a bit greedy, arrogant and less caring about their customers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
The first reply to your article shows that people still don't get it. He doesn't need VoLTE, just wants 4G800 on his phone for data. Even when carefully explained, most people are not going to see why this might be an issue. Hence the networks are going to have to be very careful how they roll out and market this.
I don't see EE doing anything much different when they roll it out. They may have a lot more of the lose ends sorted but then they are in a stronger position with their current network. 3 kind of HAD to do something. Anyway, in 2 year's time all this moaning about 3 will be academic. Pretty much all phones will be compatible and you will be able to pick up an old S5 or iPhone 6 for £50 if you want. I don't think 3 are being greedy at all. I don't see how that is the case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,694
|
Quote:
Doesn't VoLTE and Wifi Calling use basically the same technology? Surely if they support VoLTE then supporting Wifi Calling should be easier for them?
Ultimately they both end up in an IMS server which has the unenviable task of joining all the new Packet switched systems to the old Circuit switched systems and of course out into the global telephony network. Probably gets really hot... lot of fans..... : ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
|
Quote:
Pretty much all phones will be compatible and you will be able to pick up an old S5 or iPhone 6 for £50 if you want .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
You can pick up an iPhone 5 for well under 100 if you know which forums to look on and that's 2 generations back from the 6 so maybe a little more than 50 for an Iphone but not much. A lot of the compatible Android hardware will be available very cheaply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
|
Quote:
You can pick up an iPhone 5 for well under 100 if you know which forums to look on and that's 2 generations back from the 6 so maybe a little more than 50 for an Iphone but not much.
To get even an iPhone 5 (in good working and cosmetic condition) for under £100 (which is still a lot more than the quoted £50) is a rarity. Just look at one of the bigger on line forums like AVForums shows that they still go for £120-150 normally. What is the forum you look at where you consistently see good working order/good cosmetic condition iPhone 5's selling for "well under £100"? Edit, just checked Mazuma, their buy in price is still £100 for the iPhone 5 16GB, I would have to suppose your forum is that well known www.thievesandpickpockets.com .http://www.mazumamobile.com/sell-my-...ne-5-16gb/1959 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
Quote:
I get the feeling Three are slowly becoming a bit greedy, arrogant and less caring about their customers.
Over the years, it's clear that when Three has tried to shake things up the 'big boys' have looked down and laughed and carried on as normal. Now Three has figured it may as well join them. Hence many backtracks and u-turns on things that made Three stand out. In many ways it was needed. With ever increasing data usage, Three needs to keep investing heavily to cope and it wouldn't have been doing that by continuing to let people get unlimited data including tethering for £15 a month. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
No, the iPhone 5 is 3 years ago, 2 years ago was the 5S and last year was the 6.
To get even an iPhone 5 (in good working and cosmetic condition) for under £100 (which is still a lot more than the quoted £50) is a rarity. Just look at one of the bigger on line forums like AVForums shows that they still go for £120-150 normally. What is the forum you look at where you consistently see good working order/good cosmetic condition iPhone 5's selling for "well under £100"? Edit, just checked Mazuma, their buy in price is still £100 for the iPhone 5 16GB, I would have to suppose your forum is that well known www.thievesandpickpockets.com .http://www.mazumamobile.com/sell-my-...ne-5-16gb/1959 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
|
Quote:
Martin Dawes
http://mobilevaluer.com/mobile/worki...iphone-5-16gb/ If it's possible to buy loads at £50 each there is quite a profit to be made. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54.




.