What was that with Janna last night, her head on James shoulder, when all she say is shut up you dick, she is one sneaky bitch
How convenient, Jarrah Redemption just in time for Friday's Eviction
3 of 3
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“Agreed.
Maybe they are giving Jenna and Farrah a positive edit because...they've actually been pretty positive since their return.”
“Agreed.
Maybe they are giving Jenna and Farrah a positive edit because...they've actually been pretty positive since their return.”
Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“Never let the facts get in the way of cheap digs.”
“Never let the facts get in the way of cheap digs.”
Except, that's not a fact, it's speculation.
Originally Posted by puddy:
“I thought they were funny, and I hated them last week. Problem with Americans is that they're all brought up to think they're the best thing since sliced bread, where us Brits tend to put ourselves down. Therefore, they see nothing wrong with their behaviour.
I wish I could not give a sheite, like them. I'd be much happier in my self.”
“I thought they were funny, and I hated them last week. Problem with Americans is that they're all brought up to think they're the best thing since sliced bread, where us Brits tend to put ourselves down. Therefore, they see nothing wrong with their behaviour.
I wish I could not give a sheite, like them. I'd be much happier in my self.”
You'd think so wouldnt you, but Americans be cray cray
They have the highest rate of mental health disorders in the world!
I think we're much better equipped mentally to cope with life's failures on this side of the Atlantic, we're more accepting of personal unhappiness.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“I don't think viewers just take on an idea presented by the highlights -- at least not viewers in forums as given to analysis and, often, cynicism, as this one. Instead, they bring a critical understanding to the highlights -- one developed over years of watching BB, often including years when there was a 24/7 live feed.
I find it hard to think of many HMs worse than Farrah. I don't much care whether the HMs think she's ok. Most of the bb6 HMs thought Leslah Sanderson was ok.”
“I don't think viewers just take on an idea presented by the highlights -- at least not viewers in forums as given to analysis and, often, cynicism, as this one. Instead, they bring a critical understanding to the highlights -- one developed over years of watching BB, often including years when there was a 24/7 live feed.
I find it hard to think of many HMs worse than Farrah. I don't much care whether the HMs think she's ok. Most of the bb6 HMs thought Leslah Sanderson was ok.”
Biggest udders in Titsfield?
Originally Posted by Arthur_B:
“[/b]
Biggest after her mum, and her nan
”
“[/b]
Biggest after her mum, and her nan
”
Of course, how could I forget them?
She was horrible in the house, very aggressive but she's on a par comedy wise with Bonneh "I'm gonna win cos I'm gorgeous and gobby and everyfing and everyfing"
Originally Posted by pixieboots:
“Of course, how could I forget them? She was horrible in the house, very aggressive but she's on a par comedy wise with Bonneh "I'm gonna win cos I'm gorgeous and gobby and everyfing and everyfing"”
“Of course, how could I forget them?
She was horrible in the house, very aggressive but she's on a par comedy wise with Bonneh "I'm gonna win cos I'm gorgeous and gobby and everyfing and everyfing"”
Lesley was horrible in the house to Sam, and that left a very nasty taste - but the biggest boobs in Huddersfield quote was very funny. And Bonneh is an underrated BB legend - her audition video is the funniest of all time
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“...
You say that you find it hard to think of a HM worse than Farrah, and then straight afterwards in your next sentence you mention Leslie.”
“...
You say that you find it hard to think of a HM worse than Farrah, and then straight afterwards in your next sentence you mention Leslie.”
No, I said "I find it hard to think of many HMs worse than Farrah."
Not "a housemate".
Quote:
“I think most people on here if they were genuinely honest with themselves, could think of at least 10 housemates, if not a dozen more, across all series who have been far worse than any housemate this series.
If it's of any help, I'll offer a comparison off the top of my head to start you off.
Farrah or Conor? Who's worse?
Once you start thinking about it you'll be able to quite easily reel off a substantial list of names of previous housemates who can cause nightmares in grown adults.”
“I think most people on here if they were genuinely honest with themselves, could think of at least 10 housemates, if not a dozen more, across all series who have been far worse than any housemate this series.
If it's of any help, I'll offer a comparison off the top of my head to start you off.
Farrah or Conor? Who's worse?
Once you start thinking about it you'll be able to quite easily reel off a substantial list of names of previous housemates who can cause nightmares in grown adults.”
Since I vote in the "All Time Ranking" polls, I've already had to think about previous HMs, and I think Farrah is one of the worst there's ever been. I haven't tried to give her an exact placement, and I'm not inclined to bother right now, but since there have been 100s of HMs, I don't think it especially matters whether she's in the bottom 5, 10, or 20.
Whether they're good or bad, at least they're real. None of this pantomime, moronic, disingenuous kack that most of the others are demonstrating. That really IS insulting. They get my vote.
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“A critical understanding to the highlights. The same highlights which have been selected for us.”
“A critical understanding to the highlights. The same highlights which have been selected for us.”
I know they are selected for us and took that into account when writing my post.
Quote:
“We may get clues, but reverting to patterns of thought based on previous experience does not equate to people forming accurate opinions about specific situations. In fact in some cases the idea that we are affected by our own previous experiences over the years is the perfect environment for our own biases to affect our thought process, which in turn may reinforce an existing bias.”
“We may get clues, but reverting to patterns of thought based on previous experience does not equate to people forming accurate opinions about specific situations. In fact in some cases the idea that we are affected by our own previous experiences over the years is the perfect environment for our own biases to affect our thought process, which in turn may reinforce an existing bias.”
Will you be saying that to many people when they use things from BB's past to back up and argument or interpretation; and will you abandon such practices yourself, since you think it carries such a risk of bias? I don't think I've ever see you or anyone else say anything like that in this forum before. Normally, people use their knowledge and experience to help them understand what's happening in the current series and don't see anything wrong with that.
Quote:
“An opinion formed by previous experience is almost the dictionary definition of bias.”
“An opinion formed by previous experience is almost the dictionary definition of bias.”
I didn't say, mean, or imply formed by previous experience.
As with my other post, where I said "I find it hard to think of many HMs worse than Farrah", and your reply had it as "hard to think of a HM worse than Farrah", you're not replying to my actual position but instead to one that would be ridiculous.
I didn't say, mean, or imply "reverting to patterns of thought" either.
Quote:
“It's still all based on what is presented to us, which is always very limited. We have to always take that into account.”
“It's still all based on what is presented to us, which is always very limited. We have to always take that into account.”
(1) It's not based only on what's presented to us.
(2) We're not incapable of thinking about it, so that we'd have to take it all at face value.
Quote:
“As for 24/7 live feed, the truth is that nobody has ever watched 24/7 live feed, and even if anybody has somehow managed to they haven't watched a 24/7 live feed and seen all housemates at all times on all cameras.
Even if you watched a 24/7 live feed, what would be humanly possible to watch would still barely make up a fraction of everything that went on.”
“As for 24/7 live feed, the truth is that nobody has ever watched 24/7 live feed, and even if anybody has somehow managed to they haven't watched a 24/7 live feed and seen all housemates at all times on all cameras.
Even if you watched a 24/7 live feed, what would be humanly possible to watch would still barely make up a fraction of everything that went on.”
There actually were some people who watched all, or nearly all, of the live feed in which the HMs were awake (usually, at least, with the aid of recordings); but even people who didn't watch nearly that much still benefited from knowledge gleaned up people who watched at different times than they had.
In any case, nothing I said relied on anyone watching 24/7 or on cameras showing all HMs at all times.
If you think we didn't learn anything from those years about how HMs behave and how BB edits, then I think you're wrong.
Originally Posted by coke_pepper:
“Whether they're good or bad, at least they're real. None of this pantomime, moronic, disingenuous kack that most of the others are demonstrating. That really IS insulting. They get my vote.”
“Whether they're good or bad, at least they're real. None of this pantomime, moronic, disingenuous kack that most of the others are demonstrating. That really IS insulting. They get my vote.”
If they're real, it's the sort of real that may as well be fake, just as their tedious, pointless, repetitive "drama" may as well be fake or 'scripted'.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If they're real, it's the sort of real that may as well be fake, just as their tedious, pointless, repetitive "drama" may as well be fake or 'scripted'.”
“If they're real, it's the sort of real that may as well be fake, just as their tedious, pointless, repetitive "drama" may as well be fake or 'scripted'.”
I'm confused. I ran out of brain cells trying to work that one out.
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“I have been asking that question for years. Pretty well every series there are discussions about the conspiracy on the part of the producers to ensure XXXX wins. Nobody has ever come up with one valid reason why the producers would care who wins. There are occasionally suggestions that it is because they have plans for a particular contestant for the future. But we have never seen winners ( or indeed other contestants) used in such plans except in the case of Rylan.”
“I have been asking that question for years. Pretty well every series there are discussions about the conspiracy on the part of the producers to ensure XXXX wins. Nobody has ever come up with one valid reason why the producers would care who wins. There are occasionally suggestions that it is because they have plans for a particular contestant for the future. But we have never seen winners ( or indeed other contestants) used in such plans except in the case of Rylan.”
My answer for many years is betting. Personal financial gain. Seems clear to me.
Funny how chocolate sauce doesn't really work for me........................thems is still a pair of expletetives.................
3 of 3
