Originally Posted by JVS:
“Channel 5 should have warned that only SOME votes would count, that way we can decide whether we want to waste our money without the false pretences.
I hope they drop their 'You decide' catchphrase in future if they're going to cheat the public like this,”
What do you mean, "only SOME votes would count"?
Do you normally say, when a HM is evicted, that the votes to save that HM didn't count?
I think BB was on questionable ground with what they said when giving the vote numbers earlier in the week, if it was "you decide"; but that's all.
Originally Posted by Dangermoose:
“To be fair it was pretty much implied.
On Tuesday it was clearly stated that the 4 with the most votes would be safe, but they would then face a dilemma ....”
If it's only partly down to the public vote, I don't think they should say "you decide". Emma added a qualification at least one time last night, and it should have happened every time, starting when the lines first opened. They may have hinted just enough to get it past the regulator, but it was still pretty questionable.