• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Why no "UNFAIR evicition threads?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
EnricoIV
18-09-2015
You all love to whinge and moan when the GBP doesn't get to vote out the evicted person. Why so silent now?
Norn2
18-09-2015
because the majority of us dislike farrah, duh :P
cavalli
18-09-2015
We knew you'd be along to do it for us
Mrs Checks
18-09-2015
There are a few, I think they've fallen down the page after the BOTS drama.
SegaGamer
18-09-2015
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“You all love to whinge and moan when the GBP doesn't get to vote out the evicted person. Why so silent now? ”

Plenty of people thought it was unfair. My thread about her being evicted says it.
benbeez1
18-09-2015
because most of us are not whiny little children
KesGreen
18-09-2015
I think plenty of us have vented our frustration on other threads.
CLL Dodge
18-09-2015
They're all unfair if your favourite gets the boot.
Arthur_B
19-09-2015
There were a few, but not as many as there would've been a few years ago. All the more sign of BB's continuing decline.
bulldog rosie
19-09-2015
Think the OP upset because the Yank got booted ........
cavalli
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by bulldog rosie:
“Think the OP upset because the Yank got booted ........”

Now you've gawn and done it
bulldog rosie
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“Now you've gawn and done it ”

It's OK .......I'm going to bed !
Paace
19-09-2015
I thought 4 were going tonight . All the idiotic twists have turned the show into a farce .

8 people in the final is ridiculous .

You just wonder, how far more will these clowns running the show go in destroying BB .
Stan_B
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by Paace:
“I thought 4 were going tonight . All the idiotic twists have turned the show into a farce .

8 people in the final is ridiculous .

You just wonder, how far more will these clowns running the show go in destroying BB .”

I thought Emma said there was a double eviction on Tuesday so there'll be 6 in the final.
Paace
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by Stan_B:
“I thought Emma said there was a double eviction on Tuesday so there'll be 6 in the final.”

I found the whole thing so cringeworthy I could only manage to watch bits of it .
6 in a final is also ridiculous when the final is 2 days more .
JVS
19-09-2015
Channel 5 should have warned that only SOME votes would count, that way we can decide whether we want to waste our money without the false pretences.

I hope they drop their 'You decide' catchphrase in future if they're going to cheat the public like this,
dtorre
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“You all love to whinge and moan when the GBP doesn't get to vote out the evicted person. Why so silent now? ”

Because disgusting Farrah's departure is long overdue
EnricoIV
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by bulldog rosie:
“Think the OP upset because the Yank got booted ........”

Typical, you xenophobic Limey. And no, I'm not upset. It was to be expected.

But i was just curious because everyone had such conniptions during the regular BB when someone was evicted "not by the public" and were crying to get their money back. Don't remember who it was, but I know for damned sure it wasn't an American.

Just wondered if anyone had the self-awareness to admit why this didn't upset them, as well. Because they're hypocrites. It's okay if you like the result, but not if you don't. A few of you did. Well done.
muggins14
19-09-2015
I think many of us are all tired of saying it, it doesn't change anything regurgitating the same old gripe. Channel 5 don't do fair, it gets tedious saying it each and every series.

Personally I think it should always be down to the public, but then I also prefer vote to evict. Me whinging about it constantly, though, won't change anything.
Mrs Checks
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“Just wondered if anyone had the self-awareness to admit why this didn't upset them, as well. Because they're hypocrites. It's okay if you like the result, but not if you don't. A few of you did. Well done.”

To be fair, plenty of people aren't upset because they're used to this by now.

It wouldn't have mattered to me who was evicted, I wouldn't have cried "unfair!" because I've accepted that these kind of twists will happen and recognise there's no point in getting worked up about it.

If it really bothered me, I'd quit watching the show because it's clear things will never go back to the 'glory days'. Complaining about it is futile, at least in my eyes.

I'm sure at least a few FM will agree.
Mrs Checks
19-09-2015
Ha! Cross-posted with Muggins... Same sentiment
Dangermoose
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by JVS:
“Channel 5 should have warned that only SOME votes would count, that way we can decide whether we want to waste our money without the false pretences.

I hope they drop their 'You decide' catchphrase in future if they're going to cheat the public like this,”

To be fair it was pretty much implied.
On Tuesday it was clearly stated that the 4 with the most votes would be safe, but they would then face a dilemma ....
muggins14
19-09-2015
I certainly don't think Farrah would have been evicted had it been a regular eviction, which makes it an unfair eviction definitely.
Veri
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“I certainly don't think Farrah would have been evicted had it been a regular eviction, which makes it an unfair eviction definitely.”

The HMs were all equally in the same situation, so it was fair.
Veri
19-09-2015
Originally Posted by JVS:
“Channel 5 should have warned that only SOME votes would count, that way we can decide whether we want to waste our money without the false pretences.

I hope they drop their 'You decide' catchphrase in future if they're going to cheat the public like this,”

What do you mean, "only SOME votes would count"?

Do you normally say, when a HM is evicted, that the votes to save that HM didn't count?

I think BB was on questionable ground with what they said when giving the vote numbers earlier in the week, if it was "you decide"; but that's all.

Originally Posted by Dangermoose:
“To be fair it was pretty much implied.
On Tuesday it was clearly stated that the 4 with the most votes would be safe, but they would then face a dilemma ....”

If it's only partly down to the public vote, I don't think they should say "you decide". Emma added a qualification at least one time last night, and it should have happened every time, starting when the lines first opened. They may have hinted just enough to get it past the regulator, but it was still pretty questionable.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map