Originally Posted by What name??:
“Aaron., Jim Davidson, Pete Bennett, Brian Belo...”
Generally speaking, if FM's voted for Aaron to win because they liked his game then they never acknowledged that on forums. Discussions were never about tactical skill only that he was ethically in the right(fans) or ethically in the wrong (not fans).
Aaron played a devilishly cunning game, it was superb in fact, however the joke was on his poppets. Alternatively, his poppets were arguing disingenuously in order to save him from the game players kiss of death.
Jim Davidson: read above.
Pete Bennett: i don't agree he played a game. That's a new idea for me.
Brian Belo: Again he won on the genuine fun, nice guy ticket. Not the "fabulous game Brian" ticket. Didn't he?
My point is the facade, or act, or persona employed by game players is confused for the real person and that is
a tactic. Austin says to James "we know each other really well" James replies "we don't know each other at all" James is being honest for once.

but for the rest of the time Austin is getting to know James's act, like all of us are, and the act seemed to be working for him on the outside but on the inside the facade is cracking. It cracked for Aaron too especially when he voted in support of the Gordie lass in a crucial vote instead of his gf Fey. His explanations were non-sensical, still his poppets tried a rational case for him. I think less people are willing to argue for James in similar circumstances though. Which demonstrates to me that people are getting fed up with these con men/women on BB.
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“How do you know that's not what they did to win?
Do you think gameplayers are the only ones we notice because we are too clever to not spot them?”
That is my point.
I think the better the tactician the more likely we are to be fooled. I totally fell for Belo's act at the time