DS Forums

 
 

Giffgaff Worse Than Ever For Data Speeds...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19-09-2015, 08:54
Freeview_Viewer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,163

So I decided to try giffgaff again as reception in Three in my area is not great. Well how disappointed was I when I did a speed test on 3G and 4G...

3G = 0.20MB
4G = 1.1MB

Both on full signal

That's so poor I messaged an agent for a full refund..

On Three I can get 20MB on 1 bar of 4G signal and 5MB on 1 bar of 3G signal.

How can giffgaff be so bad with data speeds, that are ridiculous!
Freeview_Viewer is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 19-09-2015, 09:51
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
Well couple the fact that in most areas O2 can barely manage 1Mb if you're lucky on 3G, with Giffgaff being the lowest priority on O2 masts, with lots of customers using that mast at once, that seems like a logical speed.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 10:07
packages
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 879
I get that average 3g speed from EE mast closest to my house so you're not missing out. With full signal too (-77db)
packages is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 10:27
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
I did some speedtests well over a year ago now on giffgiff.

4G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ftkbjp&s=8

3G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2rpthg4&s=8

2G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=i3yxcl&s=8

Maybe it's time to see how much they have improved in my area.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:30
AxeVictim
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,644
Wonder if things will improve when the Three takeover is complete.
AxeVictim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:34
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
Wonder if things will improve when the Three takeover is complete.
If the takeover happens.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:35
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
I did some speedtests well over a year ago now on giffgiff.

4G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ftkbjp&s=8

3G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2rpthg4&s=8

2G
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=i3yxcl&s=8

Maybe it's time to see how much they have improved in my area.
It's bizarre how high the upload is on 4G in comparison to the download.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:37
Chris1973
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 667
So I decided to try giffgaff again as reception in Three in my area is not great. Well how disappointed was I when I did a speed test on 3G and 4G...

3G = 0.20MB
4G = 1.1MB
I get 0.5 in Congleton from '3' on 3G with a full signal, and there isn't even any 4G from three to test, so its not like the other networks are perfect either.

Suffice to say that O2 have at least brought 4G into this area!
Chris1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:44
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
I get 0.5 in Congleton from '3' on 3G with a full signal, and there isn't even any 4G from three to test, so its not like the other networks are perfect either.

Suffice to say that O2 have at least brought 4G into this area!
The difference is that GG and O2 are generally nationally poor, whereas 3 are generally much better - experiences like yours are the exception rather than the rule
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 12:56
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
It's bizarre how high the upload is on 4G in comparison to the download.
It's their O2 link saturation I think, from what I understand they have a certain link speed from the RAN back to GG and out or a certain allocation of capacity on the O2 network. Of course many are downloading and not many are uploading much data, most consumer ISPs are 90/10 ratio really. You don't upload much when you're making requests for web pages or video content, streams etc.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 13:50
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
It's their O2 link saturation I think, from what I understand they have a certain link speed from the RAN back to GG and out or a certain allocation of capacity on the O2 network. Of course many are downloading and not many are uploading much data, most consumer ISPs are 90/10 ratio really. You don't upload much when you're making requests for web pages or video content, streams etc.
Given GG is just an MVNO on the O2 network, fully owned by the O2's owners, it surprises me to read that they have a separate link to their own data network than just use the O2 existing paths. MVNO's normally buy wholesale capacity and handle billing, except Virgin Mobile who operate much more of the core stack. (maybe due to customer numbers).
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 13:51
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
Given the ownership I'm surprised it isn't literally just O2 but with different prices, no need to even be a formal MVNO

What impresses me is that I think they pay Fujitsu to do it all for them. Does O2 not have the expertise to run a second mobile network?
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 13:56
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Given the ownership I'm surprised it isn't literally just O2 but with different prices, no need to even be a formal MVNO
I wonder what the IP address ownership shows via tracemyip.org when on a GG connection.

What impresses me is that I think they pay Fujitsu to do it all for them. Does O2 not have the expertise to run a second mobile network?
I wonder if that's some clever corporate outsourcing, so Telefonica don't have to handle variable cost. Making it much easier to sell later?
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 14:26
d123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
I wonder what the IP address ownership shows via tracemyip.org when on a GG connection.
Telefonica o2 UK
d123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 14:57
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Telefonica o2 UK
thanks
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 15:16
swb1964
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,455
A steady 1 megabit would do me, even half a megabit would be usable. The problem is it's so patchy,so on-off. Fails all the the time without reason.

If Tesco ever follow Sainsburys and Asda in introducing £10 bundles, I'll be off like a shot
swb1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 15:20
omnidirectional
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,879
Presuming the O2/Three deal is approved, http://48months.ie/ could be a taste of what's to come on GiffGaff. 48Months is O2 Ireland's cheap MVNO aimed at students, now part of Three.
omnidirectional is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 15:36
jkwelly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 473
Never really been interested in data speeds as i never use them but just did a test,

I just use Giffgaff as pay £10 every three months for calls, gave the data a go using a Samsung s3 mini got d/l 1.18Mbps up/l 1.47Mbps,

Not that it means much to me.
jkwelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 15:54
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
Given the ownership I'm surprised it isn't literally just O2 but with different prices, no need to even be a formal MVNO

What impresses me is that I think they pay Fujitsu to do it all for them. Does O2 not have the expertise to run a second mobile network?
They simply didn't want the GG users usage to affect the premium network I thought, if you look at the slides it shows you the GG network, slide 5 refers to a giffgaff outage with the core data network.

http://www.slideshare.net/baker011/g...s-presentation

To what extent each bit is managed and whether gg traffic goes out of a different link remains unclear, it could just be O2 network deprioritization of gg users. However I think the IPs you get natted out of are gg? and they have had data outages which didn't affect O2.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 16:41
japaul
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
MVNO's normally buy wholesale capacity and handle billing, except Virgin Mobile who operate much more of the core stack. (maybe due to customer numbers).
Lyca is a very thick MVNO. They use their own sim cards (with their own number ranges) and HLRs. In many ways it's almost as if they are just roaming on the host network. In fact, I think if they wanted to move to a new host network, subscribers could retain their existing sims.
japaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 17:02
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,735
...and these slow speeds on GG despite the fact they overhauled their whole network last week with new price schemes that were meant to deter heavy users. They've forced the majority of people onto 4G rather than 3G at the expense of data allowance. I myself had "unlimited" 3G for £15 a month along with texts and so many minutes of calls. Now I get a capped 4G connection and a huge bump in minutes that I'm never going to use.

The point of GG seems to have evaded them. It was an option that avoided getting a contract and you could get a bundle that best suited your needs - be it data, texting or calling preferences. Now it's basically a case of 'more of everything the more you pay', which is basically what any contract is going to offer you and with much less hinderance.

I'm jumping ship, myself. Thinking of joining 3 as they offer an unlimited data contract for just £17 which is only a little more expensive than what I was paying, and it comes with numerous perks such as usage in other countries and better speeds as well.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 17:05
binary
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 636
Lyca is a very thick MVNO. They use their own sim cards (with their own number ranges) and HLRs. In many ways it's almost as if they are just roaming on the host network. In fact, I think if they wanted to move to a new host network, subscribers could retain their existing sims.
Interesting... contrast that possibility with the pig's ear that ASDA Mobile made of moving to another underlying network.
binary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 17:48
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Lyca is a very thick MVNO. They use their own sim cards (with their own number ranges) and HLRs. In many ways it's almost as if they are just roaming on the host network. In fact, I think if they wanted to move to a new host network, subscribers could retain their existing sims.
That's how I thought Virgin Mobile was implemented as well, which is why they don't / cant' get any of the new features on the underlying EE network (including 4G) without significant investment. Their income stream isn't designed for significant investment!
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 17:53
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
How come Virgin SIMs work with EE femtos then.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2015, 18:37
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
How come Virgin SIMs work with EE femtos then.
Virgin Media do all the billing and everything + customer care so it's "thick" in that sense. To sell 4G they would have to reach a new agreement, MVNOs don't usually get the ability to re-sell newer things unless they are contracted to do so and the networks like exclusivity with new things for a while.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55.