The poster said Farrah would not be see again I said she would at the final but instead of saying I forgot about that the poster decided not to do that and I simply said that I would have more respect if she admitted she had forgotten about that. I have made mistakes on here and apologised.

Typical BB viewers, kick out the interesting ones and nutters and then whinge it's boring. Nothing to crow about. We just have to put up with another few days of the unbelievably pathetic and fake Stevie and Chloe.

There's a LOT going on. I don't think Farrah has been interesting in any way, shape or form since she got back from the secret room, and she doesn't seem to be missed in the house and I don't miss her one tiny bit.

but the viewers did not kick her out, her eviction was a product of the twist.
i highly doubt she would have got the least votes from the public

I agree.

She would have been LONG gone if it was vote to evict. Everyone knows this. She was vile, ignorant and nasty and didn't deserve to be in the final. (Nor did the likes of Helen Wood and Katie Hopkins}
So this time, it is good to see that meanness hasn't been rewarded.

And she would have still been in if it was not a twisted vote but there you go and people are still talking about her even although she was apparently so bad a h/m.

"ignore the digs" when the whole thread was gloatingly set up purely to annoy farrah fans and rub their noses in it, as she had already gone , ...if you set up a thread to antagonise people and know that you will, i think you not only should expect digs BACK, but roll with it, not have sympathy.

She has more time to capitalise on her stint btw.She will be remembered more than most still in house.The public didnt evict her so she has fans.15 years on and you still dont know that Big Brrother is NOT about winning??

And she would still be in if it was a public vote to save!

Deary me, you on a high, ffs get real.

Competely agree.Austin is just nasty!

It was a vote to save the top 4 and she wasn't in it! Because she has been so vile and horrible to almost everyone she couldn't get enough viewers to vote for her so she would be safe. I reckon she would of had the least amount of votes anyway because who in their right mind would waste their money on her?

I agree, it is worrying that some would actually spend money voting to save her.

it is worrying when other people people are worried about what others are spending their money on and choosing which is their right to vote for, ..i cant stand Bobby, but its not worrying to me if people choose to vote for them if they want to, their money, their choice, its a free country,
i know she wasnt popular to all but who are you to say its worrying if other people have a different opinion to you who they want to vote for?..i worry if im going to have enough to pay a bill, or worrying is whether my family are healthy, funny what some people find worrying!
(when we all know its not "worrying" at all but a thinly veiled dig at whoever votes for someone you dont like, but if you really do find it worrying...then thats a worry!"..i can recommend some relaxion tapes.

Well I worry why people waste their money, you don't. I also worry about my families health and happiness. I worry about what the Tories are doing to my country. I worry quite a lot. It's a free country.

its not your concern what others spend their money on, anymore than its my concern on who you spend your money on voting, if you did...like you agree its a free country people can spend THEIR money on THEIR votes for who THEY want.

Perfectly put.

no, because its not any of my business, any more than its yours.

I am allowed an opinion as you are.

"Worrying" about people voting for Farrah (when in fact you mean it as a dig at people who support Farrah) is not an opinion.

Wow Missus, a little bit of perspective perhaps. Don't like Farrah, could care less who votes for whome, but I don't think it's necessary to get bent out of shape with a poster legitimately saying they worry about those that spend their money on voting for a BB contestant. Figure of speech perhaps. Anyhooo, that's how I see it

[quote=tmj;79711664]"Worrying" about people voting for Farrah (when in fact you mean it as a dig at people who support Farrah) is not an opinion.

Deleted, can't be bothered.

Of course it is an opinion.

Saying that he dislikes Farrah is an opinion.

Saying he worries about the people who vote for Farrah (not vote in general) is a dig at a lot of forum members here (personally, I would never vote for a TV show contestant but that's beside the point).

If I say I'm worried about your mental health because you support James (for example), would you excuse me by saying I'm entitled to my opinion? Because that's essentially what was implied with his/her statement.