Originally Posted by mgvsmith:
“This is probably true although I think you mean 6 decades. I remember The Stones from the 60s and 70s and for me the later recordings are not in the same class as the early works despite the sales. For me there are a few artists like Springsteen or U2 or Miles Davis ( or Kate Bush, mentioned briefly above)) who have been able to create great new works throughout their career. Maybe there should be a special prize for these kinds of artists?”
Yeah, don't know how I made that typo. Even Mick and Keith aren't that old. I think it's hard for those guys to really write songs as great as they used to because the band were so emblematic of their time and place. They're rich old guys divorced from that now. In saying that, Keith's new album has some excellent moments. Another point in their favour is that they were able to reinvent themselves and have three distinct and excellent eras - the 60s pop breakthrough, the Golden Era 1968-72 when the songs, the image, the lifestyle and the live shows combined to create magic and the Silver Era with Some Girls seeing them taking on the challenges of punk, disco and new wave.
I would agree on Miles Davis and Springsteen regarding quality over many years and maybe would add Bob Dylan into that discussion but I think U2 have been trading on musical and lyrical cliche for a long time now.