|
||||||||
Should Of Been The Public Choice Who Got To The Final |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Should Have Been The Public Choice Who Got To The Final
They should of all been put up for eviction and let the public pick the finalists.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 717
|
Should "have", not should of...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,087
|
They never do that though
they didn't in time bomb, in the CBb in January , in the CBB summer last year, it was all the people who got put up by the housemates |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,087
|
Wouldn't it be the same people in the final anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
They never do that though
they didn't in time bomb, in the CBb in January , in the CBB summer last year, it was all the people who got put up by the housemates |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,022
|
They want to wring every last drop of drama and anguish out of the whole thing, one more round of nominations suits them just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
Sorry
![]() It was too good an opportunity ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,339
|
Quote:
Some people know there poor writers and don't need it rubbing in.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,482
|
I'm absolutely paranoid now. I'll be checking every single post I make for mistakes.
It really is very bad form to correct another poster on here (unless it's really bad). I wish I hadn't done that. ![]() I apologise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
I'm absolutely paranoid now. I'll be checking every single post I make for mistakes.
It really is very bad form to correct another poster on here (unless it's really bad). I wish I hadn't done that. ![]() I apologise. ![]() I was very lazy at school. There more important things to worry about in this world than someone english, and grammer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
I'm absolutely paranoid now. I'll be checking every single post I make for mistakes.
It really is very bad form to correct another poster on here (unless it's really bad). I wish I hadn't done that. ![]() I apologise. ![]() ![]() In fact, I insist that my friends correct me if I make a mistake. But, lots of love to everybody
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
Penny, I disagree. Especially in the Title. Good grammar never hurt anyone
![]() In fact, I insist that my friends correct me if I make a mistake. But, lots of love to everybody ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,735
|
I'm not even sure if what Channel 5 did is legal. We vote, but a large number of votes are ignored - and the ACTUAL DECISION to evict (and reason for voting) is done by a housemate.
They should make it clear up front that the celeb with least public support may not leave the house. Then we can fairly decide whether to vote or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7,579
|
Quote:
Wouldn't it be the same people in the final anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
I'm not even sure if what Channel 5 did is legal. We vote, but a large number of votes are ignored - and the ACTUAL DECISION to evict (and reason for voting) is done by a housemate.
They should make it clear up front that the celeb with least public support may not leave the house. Then we can fairly decide whether to vote or not. I mean tonight nominations.. I think channel 5 should of put the whole house up for eviction and let the public decide who gets to the final. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,414
|
Quote:
I'm not even sure if what Channel 5 did is legal. We vote, but a large number of votes are ignored - and the ACTUAL DECISION to evict (and reason for voting) is done by a housemate.
They should make it clear up front that the celeb with least public support may not leave the house. Then we can fairly decide whether to vote or not. It wasn't a vote to evict. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,029
|
Quote:
They should of all been put up for eviction and let the public pick the finalists.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,029
|
Quote:
I agree.
I mean tonight nominations.. I think channel 5 should of put the whole house up for eviction and let the public decide who gets to the final. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29.


