DS Forums

 
 

Are there too many "Queens" /big female characters in EastEnders?


View Poll Results: Which big female character should be dropped in EEs crowded field?
LINDA CARTER 12 16.44%
SHARON MITCHELL 13 17.81%
STACEY SLATER 24 32.88%
KATHY SULLIVAN /BEALE 16 21.92%
SHIRLEY CARTER 26 35.62%
RONNIE MITCHELL 40 54.79%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 73. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21-09-2015, 20:17
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726

To my mind I think the show is blessed with an abundance of big female characters in many ways Queens as some would say -but are there too many vying for the viewers attention? Is it counterproductive were we have big female characters gathering dust on the soap storyline shelf?

Is EastEnders strength for big female characters so plentiful that the show is a victim of its own success?

I LOVE the fact there's so many big female characters but do some need axing /dropping as the field is overcrowded?
Who would you drop?
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 21-09-2015, 20:22
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
Obviously we won't all agree on the composition of the names on the poll list _some may think Cora, Roxy, Lauren etc should be included.
I nearly included Lauren but I felt eventually hat she wasn't a BIG BIG character in the same league as those I've chosen for consideration.
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:23
MrJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,968
None. You can never have too many Queens in soap.
MrJames is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:26
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
None. You can never have too many Queens in soap.
😁😁😁😁😁
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:34
Scrabbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
Obviously we won't all agree on the composition of the names on the poll list _some may think Cora, Roxy, Lauren etc should be included.
I nearly included Lauren but I felt eventually hat she wasn't a BIG BIG character in the same league as those I've chosen for consideration.
Jane should be included though
Scrabbler is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:36
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
Jane should be included though
Mmm debatable you may have a point but I struggle to see Jane in the same league as Queen Kathy and Queen Sharon! 😁
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:38
Scrabbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
Mmm debatable you may have a point but I struggle to see Jane in the same league as Queen Kathy and Queen Sharon! 😁
But Shirley is?
Scrabbler is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:41
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
A big character ain't necessarily a likeable character! 😁 😉

To me Jane doesn't dominate as a BIG lady character!?

Anyway it's a tie so far for Ronnie and Shirley!

To me Sharon and Kathy are in a unique stratosphere above all of the others!
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:43
bass55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
You can never have too many strong female characters; they are a soap staple.
bass55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:43
Scrabbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
A big character ain't necessarily a likeable character! 😁 😉

To me Jane doesn't dominate as a BIG lady character!?

Anyway it's a tie so far for Ronnie and Shirley!

To me Sharon and Kathy are in a unique stratosphere above all of the others!
She used to be BIG but that's when she used the name Lesley.
Scrabbler is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:44
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
You can never have too many strong female characters; they are a soap staple.
I think you can -especially when characters like Denise who I forgot to include on the list are left for long stretches without meaty storylines
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:45
The_abbott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,574
Stacey and Ronnie have been ruined recently which is ironic because in 09 they were the only queens of the square under DTC's storylines.

I'd ditch Shirley personally.
The_abbott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:45
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
She used to be BIG but that's when she used the name Lesley.
Do you pine for the Lesley era Scrabbler?! 😉
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:46
bass55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
If I had to ditch one of them it would be Ronnie. Her continued presence in the show is a joke.

Shirley is ok in small doses.
bass55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:51
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
Perhaps it was a mistake to leave Sonia of the list
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 20:59
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
Yes, I think you have a point there Hilda. There are too many'big' characters that demand big stories. This should be a strength but the writing just isn't there because of storyblocking and a lack of oomph in the writing room. So instead of knocking us out with big set piece stories that appeal to different sections of the audience the balance isn't right.

They will have the same problem when Kat returns. I agree Jane has been elevated to Queen status.
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:02
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
Yes, I think you have a point there Hilda. There are too many'big' characters that demand big stories. This should be a strength but the writing just isn't there because of storyblocking and a lack of oomph in the writing room. So instead of knocking us out with big set piece stories that appeal to different sections of the audience the balance isn't right.

They will have the same problem when Kat returns. I agree Jane has been elevated to Queen status.
May I ask who you voted for?

I think when the fields overcrowded then some get very neglected and it's the viewers who miss out. It's like in a novel, write too many big characters and it doesn't flow /work as well.
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:07
sexy_princess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 553
Shirley Carter just so when I log on I would not see incessant posts about her vag and camel toe. I cannot unsee what I have seen. Everytime I look at Shirley now on screen I immediately look at her crotch. Every scene. On the one hand at least I'm no longer annoyed at her and her endless screen time but now I crotch watch for camel toe.

Stacey Slater is another. A third rate actress whose character pretty much consists of her dropping her knickers and having her character development go around in circles.

Ronnie Mitchell is another. Like her sister she's tired as a character. Whilst her acting is okay I just don't find her believable in her role. DTC so far has not breathed new life into her character.
sexy_princess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:08
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
They should focus on the heads of the Beales, Carters, Mitchells and Trumans....Kathy, Shirley, Sharon and Denise.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:10
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
Yeah I think ronnie could go and Roxy
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:12
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
Yeah I think ronnie could go and Roxy
A joint exit back to Ibiza perhaps?
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:22
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
May I ask who you voted for?

I think when the fields overcrowded then some get very neglected and it's the viewers who miss out. It's like in a novel, write too many big characters and it doesn't flow /work as well.
I didn't but personally I'm very bored with Shirley. I think once the original 'Queens' left at the end of 2005 EE quite correctly had to create new ones - Stacey, Ronnie, Tanya, and to a lesser extent Shirley. Then DTC bumped up Jane and Shirley, introduced Linda but also had Sharon, Ronnie, Stacey, Kat to deal with.

And that's his prerogative and I don't mean to disparage it - that's not an opening salvo in a fan war.

The funny thing is fans of all of them feel short changed in some way. None of their stories have really been done justice apart from perhaps Jane. Sharon/Dennis/Phil would have been amazing in 2005, but the 2014 story and wedding was awful, Kat's burns, loss of self etc was similarly underwritten until her convent episode, Linda became the 4th party in her own rape storyline, Shirley who irritated me by becoming the focus of other characters' stories didn't really get a fair shot in her secret son reveal, Stacey is dumped in the world's dullest love triangle.

I think its really a problem of writing and focus.

It's not just the Queens - witness the poor exits of Charlie, Lola etc.

And I say this as someone who has enjoyed aspects of the show this year and can appreciate the hard work the team are doing.
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:40
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
I didn't but personally I'm very bored with Shirley. I think once the original 'Queens' left at the end of 2005 EE quite correctly had to create new ones - Stacey, Ronnie, Tanya, and to a lesser extent Shirley. Then DTC bumped up Jane and Shirley, introduced Linda but also had Sharon, Ronnie, Stacey, Kat to deal with.

And that's his prerogative and I don't mean to disparage it - that's not an opening salvo in a fan war.

The funny thing is fans of all of them feel short changed in some way. None of their stories have really been done justice apart from perhaps Jane. Sharon/Dennis/Phil would have been amazing in 2005, but the 2014 story and wedding was awful, Kat's burns, loss of self etc was similarly underwritten until her convent episode, Linda became the 4th party in her own rape storyline, Shirley who irritated me by becoming the focus of other characters' stories didn't really get a fair shot in her secret son reveal, Stacey is dumped in the world's dullest love triangle.

I think its really a problem of writing and focus.

It's not just the Queens - witness the poor exits of Charlie, Lola etc.

And I say this as someone who has enjoyed aspects of the show this year and can appreciate the hard work the team are doing.
A very thoughtful post thank you.

Balance really is key
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:43
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
A very thoughtful post thank you.

Balance really is key
Thanks H, this thread articulated something that I have felt for a while. Previously we only had 2 or 3 Queen Bees, max.
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-09-2015, 21:47
Foxster Hotpot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Martin Fowler
Posts: 11,362
Not Sharon, she is coming back up as a character, provides some great camp and is firmly rooted in the show.

Not Linda, she is part of the carter unit I love (Mick, Linda, Lee and Nancy) and I dont think that should be split apart.

Not Shirley, i'm not in favour with her character at the moment but wouldnt axe her, just axe Dean and reconcile her with her family.

Not Kathy, shes just returned.

Not Stacey, shes not as good as her first stint but Lacey is amazing and there is still potential there.

Which only leaves the once great but now sadly ruined Ronnie who gets my vote. I hope she can still be turned around though.
Foxster Hotpot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:14.