I was disappointed in Michonne when that guy died by the fence. Why didn't she end his suffering, instead of standing there gawping while he was screaming like mad as he was eaten alive?

No. Because that woukd have occurred in an actual episode and would therefore be a spoiler.

Future spoilers don't only relate to the comics, they relate to information released about the episodes themselves, or leaked information and pictures.

The way I see it:

Shown on TV, or speculation about stories down on TV = not a spoiler - if us UK people can't stay out this thread for a day though luck.

Anything other than speculation read on the internet about future events/episodes/cast- spoiler

Anything from the comic - spoiler
_-----------------------

The 'No Spoilers' in the title refers to not posting spoilers before the US/UK episode has aired. Its quite obvious really. When both episodes have aired - people shouldn't still be using spoiler tags. Its been this way since the very first season of The Walking Dead and its thread on here.


...agree with you 100%.


Anyway - back on topic.....

I heard that Monday's episode is slightly longer than its normal 1 hour slot - something big going down perhaps!?

Re: the spoiler debate. If you don't want spoilers about any TV show, don't go looking for threads (or anything) about them on the internet.

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

It's going to be 90 minutes long.

I think I read that it's going to be very Morgan-centric so it'll most probably reveal everything that happened to him after he and Rick went their separate ways.

But that would be using common sense. Discussion clearly is indicated to start as soon as the US airing has occurred. If you're at UK pace only...IT IS YOUR OWN FAULT YOU GOT SPOILED. It's clearly stated as US pace, too. As for comic spoilers...well duh they count as spoilers for TV show since they reveal future scenarios. This is a TV show topic ONLY.

My first thoughts catching up on the topic were "awwww, for the love of God not this bloody **** again!!" Just stop it, just stop it people...stop moaning to the mods just because you can't admit YOU made a mistake and spoiled it for yourself. As for those posting REAL spoilers...grow up.

I too would like to see what he has been up to. Losing his wife and son must have had some effect on his mental health.

I dont understand how he was able to rescue Aron and Daryl from the car in s 5. Morgan must have gone right into the huge crowd of walkers, take them all down. And only then could he see that someone was inside the car.

So, I hope some of his superhuman powers are explained.

Im hoping it's not a 100% Morgan centric ep, also I can't believe that so far in season 6 we have only seen 1 days worth of events

And it's not even tea-time!

Lets face it, if 24 can do a whole day in 24 episodes, it shouldn't be difficult for TWD to a couple of days in half as many episodes.

I think it is great they are concentrating on a couple of days rather than moving time on each episode.

TWD is an action horror show, and it works best when we see lots of walker action.

I won't be watching it if its Morgan-centric. I just find him a total borefest! I'd watch a 90 minute Carol-centric episode (she's the only one I'd devote that much time to) but not Morgan. I don't get all the praise for Lenny James - he's adequate (albeit boring) and that's it! Mind you - I don't get the praise for the actor who plays Ross in Emmerdale either - but I seem to be in the minority in that respect too.

Maybe people against an episode about Morgan should watch it then you might learn what happened to him and help you understand him more.

He's not my favourite character, but sometimes once I get to know a little more about a character the more I like them.

Well episode 4 is down as 'only' 75 mins on RadioTimes website for the UK Fox channel on Monday night (starts 9pm finishes for Talking Dead at 10:15), but that really means only about 50 mins story and 25 mins adverts!

Could be worse if it is spread over 90 mins in the USA, if the extra 15 mins are for even more advert padding.

Hope it's a mix of filling in the gaps about what Morgan did after 'going clear' and current events so we get some progress on the story, especially if they clear up the mess that is Glenn and don't keep stringing us along like those gut sausages.

I'd probably have been more keen on watching a Morgan-centric episode before the "JSS" episode, but the way he was behaving in that episode - dealing with a bunch of marauders who are butchering unarmed people by hitting them with a stick and advising them to mend their ways – put me right off him as a character.

...yea, it is a right ripp off that the episode is only actually an extra 5-10 mins as they'll bung in an extra ad-break after 10pm.

But then maybe the upcoming episode will explain why he did that, and we understand why he doesn't kill any more. He has drastically changed since the last time we saw him, so something must have happened to him we don't know about.

If they want us to tolerate an episode all about one character, it is best to do that at a point when the viewers aren't against that character. I can't imagine something that would make me think Morgan's actions are acceptable, and when we're all dying to know what's going on with Rick and Glenn, a week devoted to a character who is annoying everybody is not going to win them any points.

Has he changed that much? Wasn't he just a normal man before? Killing when it had to be done? I cant remember if he has killed anyone, but I am sure he has before. He is now against killing, but I dont think he has drastically changed.

The last time we saw him he went a little crazy after losing his son, and how did he learn to fight like he does? I'd say that''s pretty drastic.

I like him as a character. I don't really have favourites as it's a zombie show so I never really got attached to any of them. So long as they are involved in well set up situations then I'm okay with any of them dying. If anything I'm more sorry about good characters being introduced just to be killed off (Carter) rather than long-running characters dying.

I do like that actor in the Morgan role though. He was fantastic when first introduced right back in episode 1 or 2 or whenever it was and I'm glad he's came back into the story. I really rate him as an actor. Problem with the character is that he just doesn't seem to have long term survival prospects with his current attitude. I can only assume he went crazy when his son died and killed a lot of people and now his guilt has made him totally against killing, no matter what, otherwise he thinks he'll descend into barbarism again. For drama's sake, I can only see him ending up in situations where his non-violence will be tested and will eventually prove his undoing. The show seems to go that ironic route a lot of the time. Characters dying due to their choices and outlooks. So I expect it will come back and bite him if he doesn't adjust.

Another thing I think the Morgan character is good at is the psychological stuff with Carol. I don't think most of the other characters are shrewd enough to be in a scene like that where Morgan is letting Carol subtly know that he knows she isn't the sweet, defenceless person she is trying to portray.

As you can see - I like the character and am looking forward to the next episode. I think there might be a shock or two when we see Morgan's past.

the quarry bit annoys me most . if you could lure all the walkers there and burn them it would be perfect...ideal. so why rick sets them all free and risks everyones lives is plain stupidity. also leaving alexandria vulnerable cause you want to play ar being able to control herds of walkers with your mates is vain. ricks show off tendencies get people killed. ok the alexandrians were naive but since rick arrived a lot more of them have died than before

Renewed for a 7th season

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/the-wal...son-7-renewal/

Does burning walkers kill them or just make them crunchy?