DS Forums

 
 

GO AWAY NATASHA & JAMES! Idiots


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-09-2015, 11:21
JVS
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,737
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.

The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting.
One of the TV critics said today that his 'What's the difference between hardcore and softcore pornography?' question was all part of his little-boy lost act.
JVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-09-2015, 11:28
sheils1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,776
Have you waited 7 years to make this remark?
How funny, I can't work out if you're doing it for a bet or you've just remembered your password
??? Janice doid read her letter slyly in the diary room, and they stuck up for this nasty evil woman, yes they are nasty.
sheils1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 11:30
wotnot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Strangetown
Posts: 8,074
You and I are clearly watching a different show!: confused:
This phrase should be the tagline of the series, it's been used that often
wotnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 11:35
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.

The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting.
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'

Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall.

And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done.

He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear.

What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 11:40
Salv*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,845
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'

Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall.

And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done.

He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear.

What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
How dare you! Making sense and all!
Salv* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 11:48
Linaker99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 50
I agree, Austin spoke to Janice like she was a piece of sh*t & Jenna is the most two faced in that house.

Natasha, James & Janice are my favourites. I hope they are in the final 3!!!!
Janice is a piece of sh*t. I've never seen anyone so self absorbed and selfish. Bobby Davro is right. As soon as she's evicted, Janice will be back to America, thinking about the next reality show and Chloe Jasmine will be a dim distant memory of someone Janice used to try to win popularity for herself.

Austin crossed a line yesterday saying a mother shouldn't behave like Janice, but most of what he said was true. She does cut a sad figure touting herself from one reality show to another.
Linaker99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 11:55
Salv*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,845
Janice is a piece of sh*t. I've never seen anyone so self absorbed and selfish. Bobby Davro is right. As soon as she's evicted, Janice will be back to America, thinking about the next reality show and Chloe Jasmine will be a dim distant memory of someone Janice used to try to win popularity for herself.

Austin crossed a line yesterday saying a mother shouldn't behave like Janice, but most of what he said was true. She does cut a sad figure touting herself from one reality show to another.
I don't think Austin is in any position to criticize Janice when:

1. The things he was saying were more aimed at his "best friend" Jenna.
2. Her mothering skills is most likely 100% better than Jenna's and certainly Farrah's.
3. He is popular ONLY for reality shows. Janice has been in the limelight for the amount of years he has been alive + 20 more. Apart from dating Marc Jacobs, what else has he done?
Salv* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 12:53
GoinGaga
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,810
How dare you! Making sense and all!
He/she sure does. Great post AT
GoinGaga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 12:58
ForGodsSake
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
Janice is Ace.
She's so manipulating under the dotty exterior.

Austin is a nasty soab.
ForGodsSake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 17:42
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
??? Janice doid read her letter slyly in the diary room, and they stuck up for this nasty evil woman, yes they are nasty.
How strange that you would reply to that comment when it's directed at a FM who has been here 7 years and made only a few posts.

I've been told people have back up screen names for when they are banned.
Did you make a mistake?

Also your reply is not to the question, it's a continuation of the OPs silly thought process
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 17:43
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
I don't think Austin is in any position to criticize Janice when:

1. The things he was saying were more aimed at his "best friend" Jenna.
2. Her mothering skills is most likely 100% better than Jenna's and certainly Farrah's.
3. He is popular ONLY for reality shows. Janice has been in the limelight for the amount of years he has been alive + 20 more. Apart from dating Marc Jacobs, what else has he done?
Fair.
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 17:48
yellowlabbie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'

Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall.

And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done.

He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear.

What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
Great post
yellowlabbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 17:59
Skyrah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 12,292
Bravo! Shout with shouts = Result

NATASHA NOT TO WIN!
JAMES MOST DEFINITELY NOT TO WIN,

Get them both OUT!
sorry to burst your bubble, but neither are up for tonites eviction
Skyrah is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:06
Darcyprincess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.

The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting.
Yes and we see how he has been going to Natasha and feeding her with anti Austin vibes. I don't think Natasha would have nominated Austin if James hadn't moaned so much to her about him! James is set alright but Natasha is one of the good guys!

Natasha for the win!
Darcyprincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:06
Skyrah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 12,292
How strange that you would reply to that comment when it's directed at a FM who has been here 7 years and made only a few posts.

I've been told people have back up screen names for when they are banned.
Did you make a mistake?

Also your reply is not to the question, it's a continuation of the OPs silly thought process
I thought the same,
Skyrah is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:11
diesels hummin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,034
The reasons James gave for saving Janice were preposterous ,he cannot defend them and resents anyone who expects him to do so.
diesels hummin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:12
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
I thought the same,
I've only been here a few months, it's weird how attached people are.
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:34
roseblue1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,249
At least Natasha contributed something more tonight than asking for coathangers.

We probably won't hear from her again this week.
True I find her so booooring.
roseblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 18:48
MistyEyes321
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a Pine Box
Posts: 696
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.

The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting.
Just like James has done with Austin from day one wound Austin up & let him go & its been acceptable until now.

Austin hasn't changed in the slightest since the first night he has been consistent with his big mouth throughout.
Granted using the C word is disgusting imho & shouting at anyone has been fine as long as it has been aimed at Farrah, Jenna, Janice, What has changed?
MistyEyes321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 19:10
Rough Diamond
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,209
Bravo! Shout with shouts = Result

NATASHA NOT TO WIN!
JAMES MOST DEFINITELY NOT TO WIN,

Get them both OUT!
Yay, I agree, Natasha has done nothing to win,James is sneaky devious and disloyal to his friend Austin,his reason for nominating him was ridiculous, especially two days to the final, just like his reason for saving Janice,he is the biggest gameplayer in the house,I really wanted him to win but not now he has showed his true colours.
Rough Diamond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 19:13
roseblue1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,249
Yes and we see how he has been going to Natasha and feeding her with anti Austin vibes. I don't think Natasha would have nominated Austin if James hadn't moaned so much to her about him! James is set alright but Natasha is one of the good guys!

Natasha for the win!
Natasha has been boring as hell....James is playing a game and I admire him for doing just that.
roseblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 19:13
yellowlabbie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
Yay, I agree, Natasha has done nothing to win,James is sneaky devious and disloyal to his friend Austin,his reason for nominating him was ridiculous, especially two days to the final, just like his reason for saving Janice,he is the biggest gameplayer in the house,I really wanted him to win but not now he has showed his true colours.
So he's playing a game, well it is a game show now.
yellowlabbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2015, 19:45
Penny Crayon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,498
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'

Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall.

And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done.

He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear.

What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
How did I miss this post earlier.

What a great summing up m'lud.

Really says all that I'm thinking too.
Penny Crayon is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44.