|
||||||||
GO AWAY NATASHA & JAMES! Idiots |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,740
|
Quote:
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.
The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,776
|
Quote:
Have you waited 7 years to make this remark?
How funny, I can't work out if you're doing it for a bet or you've just remembered your password ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Strangetown
Posts: 8,074
|
Quote:
You and I are clearly watching a different show!: confused:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,133
|
Quote:
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.
The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting. Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall. And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done. He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear. What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Quote:
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'
Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall. And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done. He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear. What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
I agree, Austin spoke to Janice like she was a piece of sh*t & Jenna is the most two faced in that house.
Natasha, James & Janice are my favourites. I hope they are in the final 3!!!! Austin crossed a line yesterday saying a mother shouldn't behave like Janice, but most of what he said was true. She does cut a sad figure touting herself from one reality show to another. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Quote:
Janice is a piece of sh*t. I've never seen anyone so self absorbed and selfish. Bobby Davro is right. As soon as she's evicted, Janice will be back to America, thinking about the next reality show and Chloe Jasmine will be a dim distant memory of someone Janice used to try to win popularity for herself.
Austin crossed a line yesterday saying a mother shouldn't behave like Janice, but most of what he said was true. She does cut a sad figure touting herself from one reality show to another. 1. The things he was saying were more aimed at his "best friend" Jenna. 2. Her mothering skills is most likely 100% better than Jenna's and certainly Farrah's. 3. He is popular ONLY for reality shows. Janice has been in the limelight for the amount of years he has been alive + 20 more. Apart from dating Marc Jacobs, what else has he done? |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
How dare you! Making sense and all!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Janice is Ace.
She's so manipulating under the dotty exterior. Austin is a nasty soab. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
??? Janice doid read her letter slyly in the diary room, and they stuck up for this nasty evil woman, yes they are nasty.
I've been told people have back up screen names for when they are banned. Did you make a mistake? Also your reply is not to the question, it's a continuation of the OPs silly thought process
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
I don't think Austin is in any position to criticize Janice when:
1. The things he was saying were more aimed at his "best friend" Jenna. 2. Her mothering skills is most likely 100% better than Jenna's and certainly Farrah's. 3. He is popular ONLY for reality shows. Janice has been in the limelight for the amount of years he has been alive + 20 more. Apart from dating Marc Jacobs, what else has he done? |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'
Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall. And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done. He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear. What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 12,294
|
Quote:
Bravo! Shout with shouts = Result
![]() NATASHA NOT TO WIN! JAMES MOST DEFINITELY NOT TO WIN, Get them both OUT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.
The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting. Natasha for the win! |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 12,294
|
Quote:
How strange that you would reply to that comment when it's directed at a FM who has been here 7 years and made only a few posts.
I've been told people have back up screen names for when they are banned. Did you make a mistake? Also your reply is not to the question, it's a continuation of the OPs silly thought process ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,034
|
The reasons James gave for saving Janice were preposterous ,he cannot defend them and resents anyone who expects him to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
I thought the same,
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,249
|
Quote:
At least Natasha contributed something more tonight than asking for coathangers.
We probably won't hear from her again this week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a Pine Box
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
I think James has played the game to the Max. His nom on Austin played out like an open book, he knew Austin would blow and this may cost him his place in the house. Little by little putting on the pressure by not giving Austin and Jenna an answer that made sense.
The vote on Friday gave James and idea who his rivals were. If he plays this right Natasha and Steve & Chloe are next. Last night he sat back and let Natasha do the shouting. Austin hasn't changed in the slightest since the first night he has been consistent with his big mouth throughout. Granted using the C word is disgusting imho & shouting at anyone has been fine as long as it has been aimed at Farrah, Jenna, Janice, What has changed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Bravo! Shout with shouts = Result
![]() NATASHA NOT TO WIN! JAMES MOST DEFINITELY NOT TO WIN, Get them both OUT! |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,249
|
Quote:
Yes and we see how he has been going to Natasha and feeding her with anti Austin vibes. I don't think Natasha would have nominated Austin if James hadn't moaned so much to her about him! James is set alright but Natasha is one of the good guys!
Natasha for the win! |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
Yay, I agree, Natasha has done nothing to win,James is sneaky devious and disloyal to his friend Austin,his reason for nominating him was ridiculous, especially two days to the final, just like his reason for saving Janice,he is the biggest gameplayer in the house,I really wanted him to win but not now he has showed his true colours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,499
|
Quote:
Actually James gets my sympathy there. It isn't often in the house when someone makes a decision as required by the game they get interrogated. Normally HMs take it on the chin or stew away in the background. They are not normally followed around for several days by two people demanding to know why he 'didn't save them' or chose to nominate them'
Had they not hounded him about his choice of saving Janice (odd thought it may have been) he may not have found it so easy to nominate them this time. He doesn't owe them an explanation. In fact in the case of Jenna, he owes her absolutely nothing. Yes they have had friendly moments, chats even a bit of mild flirting but he owes her no more debt of friendship on the basis of that, than he does others in the house with whom he has also had very cordial relationships. He hasn't fallen out with anyone else that I can recall. And Jenna did nominate James and she did it gleefully and he saw her doing it. I don't think he did it to even a score, but it does seem that she was the one that set the ground rules that you can nominate even those you profess to like. To make matters worse not only does she and her current ally follow him around seemingly to demand he acknowledge a special relationship with her, she then fails to listen when he attempted to "break his decisions down" . He had got just two lines into his explanation and had done no more than recap the facts and she was straight in there interjecting her view on what he had done. He was quite right neither of them will ever understand the reasons (good bad or indifferent) because neither listen and both are too busy telling him why they think he did what he did. In those circumstances there is no point trying to offer an explanation that the other party can't or won't hear. What is the big deal anyway. He nominated them - so what? Its not like he stole their ATM cards and emptied their accounts or drowned their puppy or violated their sisters. He nominated two contestants in a game show. What a great summing up m'lud. Really says all that I'm thinking too. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:04.





