Originally Posted by
Salv*:
“Sorry, I don't get why he should be loyal to her out of all people 
As I have said, she is the person out of the whole house along with Farrah that bitched about him the most. A "friend" doesn't mean you can't nominate them when they have done something wrong. ”
You say this even after hearing James say in regards his Jenna nom "you've done nothing wrong, really" According to James, which is the truth, eh? Either he betrayed Jenna by nominating her or he's lying to her now by saying i had no legitimate reason for nominating you.
Quote:
“I'd nominate a friend if I thought they were being an asshole. I wouldn't want loyalty with people who act in a certain way. Austin and Jenna have calmed down now.
Out of everyone, Jenna deserves the least loyalty from James in the house. As I said again, she has been awful behind his back. He doesn't even know 90% of the stuff she has said behind his back, I just don't know how people aren't seeing it.”
Their not the assholes he is

Like i said before all they want is the basis on which his decision to pick Janice was made. Their not asking for this: "because Chloe needed a grandpa figure" They are asking for an answer to this: Why do chloe a favour and not base your decision on friendship.
That's the place they want to reach and the place James continuously retreats away from. Why? Is it because he would then have to explain he'd placed tactical advantage over friendship? Perhaps he'd have to explain that he doesn't really see Jenna as a friend despite tactically behaving that way.
Quote:
“As for Austin, James would have been pretty dumb to think nominating his friend who was in the Top 4 was going to score points with the viewers, It's a stupid tactic. If I wanted to really win, I'd want to get support from the public by arguing with the people I knew were unpopular, not the people I knew were popular.
That's a ridiculous thing to do
So it proves he did it because he was annoyed at Austin, not because he wanted the public to say "YAYYY, he nominated his friend, he must win now".”
It's quite smart actually considering James knew the effect his nom would have on Austin. Austin has fallen hook line and sinker for James, Austin, like Farrah, is also hot headed and liable to explode under the subtlest of provocations. SCORE!!!
Quote:
“A huge majority of HMs in the past kick off with people they know are unpopular. As a HM said in the past (cant remember which series) "You need to be careful who you fight with, because if you row with the favourite to win, you are done" (I think it was BB6 Craig).
If James wanted to get points from the public, he would have gone against the Bobby's, the Janice's and The Sherrie's knowing they weren't as popular.”
Sound reasoning for the early stages sure, but not for this late stage, There can only be one winner, and at some point you have to tactically challenge the big dogs based on sound reasoning and evaluation of success. James has fashioned a wonderful position to score points off Austin, whilst at the same tim fashioning a wonderful position to look innocent of any wrong doing, although the cracks are plain to see. It's quite baffling how people don't want to see the cracks but plaster over them to aid him to victory