|
||||||||
BOTS Audience Have A Gagging Order It Seems |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
As an audience member who appears often myself, I have to back up last night's audience and say that various legal reasons from a contract signed by audience members before they enter the BOTS studio, states that any given information from a member regarding conflict off-air in the studio, can result in the consequence of that member being banned from the studio and show in the future.
Look at how they act on the show shouting out , talking over each other and the general look at me , look at me face they have whenever the camera is near. Whatever Bb has threatened them with must be good either that or they paid them to keep quiet. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
No offence but some of the idiot loudmouths they have in the audience I can't see them reading a contract before signing and even less likely to keep their big mouth shut.
Look at how they act on the show shouting out , talking over each other and the general look at me , look at me face they have whenever the camera is near. Whatever Bb has threatened them with must be good either that or they paid them to keep quiet. |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
|
Quote:
As an audience member who appears often myself, I have to back up last night's audience and say that various legal reasons from a contract signed by audience members before they enter the BOTS studio, states that any given information from a member regarding conflict off-air in the studio, can result in the consequence of that member being banned from the studio and show in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,674
|
Just because the police were called doesn't mean you can't talk about what you saw. Only if someone was charged would you have to hold back on what had gone on.
Real shame it wasn't live. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,674
|
Quote:
They have to sign the contract, otherwise they can't go into the studio. And as well as that, they are forced to listen to a member of the BOTS team reading out the contract rules. Audience members are asked to be rowdy and voice their opinion - they're asked to shine as much as they can. They were not threatened, they were strictly asked to bide by the rules of the form that they sign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Is this a new thing? I went on BOTS back when it originally begun and don't recall signing anything.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Yorkshire, God's County
Posts: 1,414
|
Quote:
This has been around since 2013 - as far as I am aware, but every time I have gone a form has needed to be signed.
Anyone else had the same thought? |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Thanks for the insight Tom, it is appreciated information (not surprised though). Please do not take any offence at all by my next comment, as none is intended. However, as I was watching BOTS last night I did think to myself that the same audience has become tiresome and it would be nice to see new faces and hear other opinions.
Anyone else had the same thought? |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Yorkshire, God's County
Posts: 1,414
|
Quote:
No, I agree. I'm not a regular like them - I appear once or twice per series. It comes to no surprise that people tire of seeing the same audience. We have a few regulars going into the house tonight, one being Irish John. I do understand your point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,120
|
Quote:
Carol was being complimentary about Farrah and even said she was sad she was evicted......after the "tiff" Carol had changed her opinion and was glad she had been booted out.
It seems during the break words were exchanged. As for Farrah on last nights BOTS....I thought she came across extremely rude, especially to Vicki, who merely tried to explain in a calm and reasonable voice, why she wasn't sorry to see Farrah go. Farrah responded in her usual way, of talking over Vicki, not listening to her, putting her hand up, and acting like a prima donna. I'm not going to defend Farrah, girl has a lot to learn. But what I have learned about her is that if she picks up on your negative feelings towards her she shuts down, wall goes up and she talks through you. Farrah doesn't act that way with EVERYONE, she gives what she gets. She gives it tenfold but she gives what she gets. If you look at the more mature, sensible ones in the house (Sherrie, Scoop and yes even Gail) Farrah was different with them. They recognized her pressure point, chose a different approach and it worked. Sane intelligent people who really don't like that sort of behaviour and don't feel the need to ham it up for attention know how to avoid the wrath of people like Farrah. You can see it in Emma's eviction interview, Farrah arrives ready to play the game and then when Emma sticks to the party line of evil Farrah you see Farrah shut down. Emma thinks she's a difficult interview but Rylan has a different approach and gets a different Farrah to interview. Emma couldn't hide her dislike of Farrah, Rylan could (during his post eviction interview, the rest of his airtime he plays a big part in the Farrah fiasco but at the time of her interview Farrah would have been unaware). If I walk into an arena waving a red flag to a bull I can't be surprised and stunned by the reaction of the bull. Vicki may have just been waving a red handkerchief compared to the huge tarp Aisleyne was flapping around but they both went on the panel to have a go at Farrah. Farrah knew it. She didn't even look at either of them and for all her faults I think Farrah would have acknowledged Vicki had there been nothing negative prior to the "live" show. Her first night on BBOTS was with an anti-Farrah panel and for her next appearance the stacked the panel against her again. She was ready and on the defensive from the start. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
Of course... Ah if only there was some way somebody could tell the harrowing story anonymously... But they can't, because the internet hasn't been invented yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Quote:
As an audience member who appears often myself, I have to back up last night's audience and say that various legal reasons from a contract signed by audience members before they enter the BOTS studio, states that any given information from a member regarding conflict off-air in the studio, can result in the consequence of that member being banned from the studio and show in the future.
Quote:
I tried to ask Paul, who is a good friend of mine, last night - and he wouldn't even tell me any information because he was strictly forbidden too. Other than the details we have already heard today.
Besides, so what if BB might ban someone who said what happened? Why are they all letting the mere possibility intimidate them? |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Quote:
Maybe the matter is under criminal investigation and the potential witnesses are required to remain silent until it is decided if charges are to be brought.
Quote:
If it is to go to court any witness statements aired on a pubic platform may be considered as influencing the jury and the case being thrown out of court. The police will have told all witnesses this if they did attend.
Quote:
This is what is being said on various newspapers and sites and adds nothing new.
I would probably agree with another poster that charges of assault may be brought and as such it cannot be commented on but I wish I was a fly on the wall. I lay all the blame with channel 5 as they knew this would be explosive and brought Aisleyne in purposely for that reason. They cannot then act as if it was a shock to them. Its like fight night all over again. Did anyone notice by the way that just before it was taken off as they started to kick off Jenna looked scared. She's full of the big "I am" but only likes to load bullets for Farrah, not get involved in this mayhem So none of those legal explanations are convincing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,188
|
Quote:
That's a ridiculous restriction when Aisleyne is free to tell her version to the Mirror.
Besides, so what if BB might ban someone who said what happened? Why are they all letting the mere possibility intimidate them? I'd be embarrassed to be associated with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
|
Two desperate z listers in a room, we all know what happened really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
|
Quote:
Would you believe the tale of an anonymous person on the internet?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North East
Posts: 12,254
|
Funny thing is that social media is your opinion and not owned by Channel 5, If I say the show is a disgrace and should be axed on social media. Its my word not there's. Mind I will never even go near the show these days anyway so its moot point.
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,709
|
Makes total sense they have to sign a contract. Whether they read it or now doesn't count legally. At the same time I'm amazed no-one's come out anonynously via a proxy etc today and explained just what did go on!!! Quote:
Thanks for the insight Tom, it is appreciated information (not surprised though). Please do not take any offence at all by my next comment, as none is intended. However, as I was watching BOTS last night I did think to myself that the same audience has become tiresome and it would be nice to see new faces and hear other opinions.
Anyone else had the same thought? Quote:
No, I agree. I'm not a regular like them - I appear once or twice per series. It comes to no surprise that people tire of seeing the same audience. We have a few regulars going into the house tonight, one being Irish John. I do understand your point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
No, I agree. I'm not a regular like them - I appear once or twice per series. It comes to no surprise that people tire of seeing the same audience. We have a few regulars going into the house tonight, one being Irish John. I do understand your point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,709
|
Quote:
That's a ridiculous restriction when Aisleyne is free to tell her version to the Mirror.
Besides, so what if BB might ban someone who said what happened? Why are they all letting the mere possibility intimidate them? At the end of the day Ash will have to stand by her account, the others are all a grey area. Just mho
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,871
|
Quote:
I think Vicki made it clear she wasn't a fan of Farrah. Rylan asked her if she missed seeing Farrah in there and she responded "No, no, no....." Vicki and Aisleyne also tweeted pre-show photos of them hugging each other. You'd be a fool to think those two weren't chatting about their talking points.
I'm not going to defend Farrah, girl has a lot to learn. But what I have learned about her is that if she picks up on your negative feelings towards her she shuts down, wall goes up and she talks through you. Farrah doesn't act that way with EVERYONE, she gives what she gets. She gives it tenfold but she gives what she gets. If you look at the more mature, sensible ones in the house (Sherrie, Scoop and yes even Gail) Farrah was different with them. They recognized her pressure point, chose a different approach and it worked. Sane intelligent people who really don't like that sort of behaviour and don't feel the need to ham it up for attention know how to avoid the wrath of people like Farrah. You can see it in Emma's eviction interview, Farrah arrives ready to play the game and then when Emma sticks to the party line of evil Farrah you see Farrah shut down. Emma thinks she's a difficult interview but Rylan has a different approach and gets a different Farrah to interview. Emma couldn't hide her dislike of Farrah, Rylan could (during his post eviction interview, the rest of his airtime he plays a big part in the Farrah fiasco but at the time of her interview Farrah would have been unaware). If I walk into an arena waving a red flag to a bull I can't be surprised and stunned by the reaction of the bull. Vicki may have just been waving a red handkerchief compared to the huge tarp Aisleyne was flapping around but they both went on the panel to have a go at Farrah. Farrah knew it. She didn't even look at either of them and for all her faults I think Farrah would have acknowledged Vicki had there been nothing negative prior to the "live" show. Her first night on BBOTS was with an anti-Farrah panel and for her next appearance the stacked the panel against her again. She was ready and on the defensive from the start. Just to add, in the other corner we have Jenna who thinks she was good for Farrah and was mentoring her when in reality she would wind her up real good and this resulted in Farrah getting into arguments most of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
I think Vicki made it clear she wasn't a fan of Farrah. Rylan asked her if she missed seeing Farrah in there and she responded "No, no, no....." Vicki and Aisleyne also tweeted pre-show photos of them hugging each other. You'd be a fool to think those two weren't chatting about their talking points.
I'm not going to defend Farrah, girl has a lot to learn. But what I have learned about her is that if she picks up on your negative feelings towards her she shuts down, wall goes up and she talks through you. Farrah doesn't act that way with EVERYONE, she gives what she gets. She gives it tenfold but she gives what she gets. If you look at the more mature, sensible ones in the house (Sherrie, Scoop and yes even Gail) Farrah was different with them. They recognized her pressure point, chose a different approach and it worked. Sane intelligent people who really don't like that sort of behaviour and don't feel the need to ham it up for attention know how to avoid the wrath of people like Farrah. You can see it in Emma's eviction interview, Farrah arrives ready to play the game and then when Emma sticks to the party line of evil Farrah you see Farrah shut down. Emma thinks she's a difficult interview but Rylan has a different approach and gets a different Farrah to interview. Emma couldn't hide her dislike of Farrah, Rylan could (during his post eviction interview, the rest of his airtime he plays a big part in the Farrah fiasco but at the time of her interview Farrah would have been unaware). If I walk into an arena waving a red flag to a bull I can't be surprised and stunned by the reaction of the bull. Vicki may have just been waving a red handkerchief compared to the huge tarp Aisleyne was flapping around but they both went on the panel to have a go at Farrah. Farrah knew it. She didn't even look at either of them and for all her faults I think Farrah would have acknowledged Vicki had there been nothing negative prior to the "live" show. Her first night on BBOTS was with an anti-Farrah panel and for her next appearance the stacked the panel against her again. She was ready and on the defensive from the start. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15.



