Originally Posted by coke_pepper:
“Janis chucked a chair, then she didn't. Viki Gangsta and Janis were going to continue before Viki remembered she'd been hit by a glass and was rushed to hospital but she wasn't. It's all bunkum.”
“Janis chucked a chair, then she didn't. Viki Gangsta and Janis were going to continue before Viki remembered she'd been hit by a glass and was rushed to hospital but she wasn't. It's all bunkum.”
That's a good point. They were all going to try and continue. It was only after that when it was decided to not bother as people were crying that several of them came up with their own versions of events and spoke of being injured with mentions of medical checks and legal threats.
I saw one post saying that Vicki's account of events was 'straight from the horse's mouth' as though she was the voice of authority on the matter.
Why is Vicki the horse?
Why would her account be any more truthful than anybody else's? She certainly decided to leave out the actions of Aisleyne which led up to the incident, which we saw. So I'm not going to take her word as gospel.
The truth will probably in there somewhere once you take bits and pieces of various people's accounts and add them together.
But I don't think we're getting true objectivity at the moment. Whatever anyone is saying so far appears to have been tainted by their own emotions, bias, and subjective view of the situation.
