DS Forums

 
 

BOTS being anti James


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-09-2015, 00:28
3rd World Disco
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22,680
I don't care much.

As I said The Assassination of Aaron was a 10 week event on BOTS. And he still won!
Aaron had viewers irate with his treatment by production voting for him, though.
3rd World Disco is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-09-2015, 00:31
Salv*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,845
Aaron had viewers irate with his treatment by production voting for him, though.
Loved it. BOTS trying to pull out a Jay or Alex
win. How awful would they have been!
Salv* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 00:38
3rd World Disco
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22,680
Loved it. BOTS trying to pull out a Jay or Alex
win. How awful would they have been!
Haha I just had to Google Alex.

Jay would have been Anthony Hutton 2 - Electric Boogaloo.
3rd World Disco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 00:55
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
Nor mine, how is nomming someone who was treating you badly and upsetting and hurting you dirty? Especially when he must have been aware that it could look like betrayal?

Austin shouldn't have acted the prat and not listened to James. James tried to save Austin's arse. And he got nothing but abuse for it including being called all the names under the sun.

But it's not worth bothering about, some have some odd ideas about loyalty that don't bear scrutiny.
My problem since the nomination debacle is that so many third parties are imposing this 'best friend' label on them. We sit here as third party outsiders and decide they are best friends. Says who? Us? What right have we to decide that? Clearly they like each other, they seem to have similar humour and both enjoy horsing around in that laddish way but that doesn't necessarily make them best friends.
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:10
lulu g
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,553
My problem since the nomination debacle is that so many third parties are imposing this 'best friend' label on them. We sit here as third party outsiders and decide they are best friends. Says who? Us? What right have we to decide that? Clearly they like each other, they seem to have similar humour and both enjoy horsing around in that laddish way but that doesn't necessarily make them best friends.
Quite. While housemates will get on better with some other housemates than others, they are not friends; they are rivals in a competition that they all want to win.

BOTS are just trying to move people to vote more. If viewers think that James winning is a done deal, they are less likely to bother voting.
lulu g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:12
FunboyFandango
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,188
Visage really let rip on him tonight.

I thought that was a bit much.
FunboyFandango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:19
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
Visage really let rip on him tonight.

I thought that was a bit much.
Well not exactly letting rip just a bit of criticism. But much as I lie Michelle V and have forgiven her for her own errors of judgement, her credibility is surely shot in that she chose Katie Hopkins as her best friend in the house.

Which goes back to my earlier point. She (like many others) is projecting her idea of who is best friends on James and Austin. The woman who is now embarrassed to have picked KH as her house friend should know better than anybody not to rush to judgement about who is friends with who.
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:21
CakeLike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 157
He is just fake and obnoxious, anyone else should win but him
CakeLike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:23
FunboyFandango
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,188
Well not exactly letting rip just a bit of criticism. But much as I lie Michelle V and have forgiven her for her own errors of judgement, her credibility is surely shot in that she chose Katie Hopkins as her best friend in the house.

Which goes back to my earlier point. She (like many others) is projecting her idea of who is best friends on James and Austin. The woman who is now embarrassed to have picked KH as her house friend should know better than anybody not to rush to judgement about who is friends with who.
Is she distancing herself from KH now? I haven't kept track of what happened with them since they left the house.
FunboyFandango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 01:53
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
Is she distancing herself from KH now? I haven't kept track of what happened with them since they left the house.
It seems so . She has poked fun at herself for misjudging Katie H a couple of times on BBBOTS
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 07:42
graciemay6
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,087
I switched over from bots last night
They were being completely anti James and also anti stevi and chloe jasmine
I'm getting sick of the same opinions saying the same thing on bots
Until James is on the outside and has his interview to defend him nominating austin, I wish bots would leave James alone and until stevi and Chloe Jasmine have their interview to defend their relationship, I wish bots would leave them alone as well
graciemay6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 07:44
graciemay6
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,087
Bots last night was literally 'lets kiss austins ass' show
graciemay6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 08:30
moleymo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,715
I was wondering that after meeting Janice they also think they would have lost the plot with her
can you imagine living with her 24/7 if she is so volatile she would throw a chair at someone?
moleymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 08:34
moleymo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,715
James should have give his real reasons for nominations if he wanted to keep the public onside
he wanted Austin out the house before the final
his being sanctimonious about his reasons saying he wanted to reprimand Austin and treating him likens naughty boy is rubbing people up the wrong way
moleymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 08:52
sheils1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,776
They were right to point out what he is like.
sheils1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 09:17
hannah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,352
Maybe I'm in the minority even though James is Austin's mate I can fully understand why he nominated him. I also think that in the past week James only disagreements came with Austin and Jenna so they were the only two his was going to nominate. Also he was never going to nominate the others.

Also if he loses tonight because of backstabbing his best mate then so be it but he was right to so.
hannah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 09:24
rosiedevon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: cloud lambert
Posts: 6,124
Didn't the results of the quiz they did with Eammon shown in H/L's say James was right to nominate Austin.
rosiedevon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 09:27
hannah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,352
Didn't the results of the quiz they did with Eammon shown in H/L's say James was right to nominate Austin.
Yep 65% said he was right to
hannah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 09:31
rosiedevon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: cloud lambert
Posts: 6,124
Yep 65% said he was right to
Thought so. That's why they were anti James on bots just to confuse everyone lol.

When in fact if the H.M's were clever enough they could work out themselves that what's said on bots is a load of rubbish.
rosiedevon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 10:19
Linaker99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 50
Yep 65% said he was right to
Just shows that you can fool some of the people and indeed that doing so is easy. As Austin correctly pointed out, nominating someone says you are the person in this house whose company I like least and I want you away from me. It does not say I really like you and want you to win the series.
Linaker99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 10:22
Arcana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 🖥⌨🖱
Posts: 29,243
Maybe it's a sign that he's absolutely streets ahead in the vote.

Not long until we find out.
Arcana is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 11:26
nanna7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,726
i am with bots on this one cant stand the bloke but he will win
nanna7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2015, 12:13
froja
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,659
I am so happy James got to know a lot of people think he was right nominating Austin. Janice was amazing standing up for him as well in that task. Michelle goes on and on about forgivness when it comes to Austin and that's fine, but in the same breath she talks about James nominating Austin as the biggest crime of the century. It's really odd. Loyalty this and Loyalty that. I am not a fan of blind loyalty myself. James stayed true to himself.
froja is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43.