• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
I think it's disgusting that Austin made the final 2 !!!
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
Rhumbatugger
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Blue Eyed lady:
“BIB she didn't half, therefore Austin calling her it will have whooshed right over her head, Janice Dickinson is not only as mad as a box of frogs, she's as hard as nails & I'm sure Austin (much as I loathe the c word) calling her that will have been water of a duck's back.
Agree with rest of your post.”

He didn't want it to though. He wanted to insult and hurt her as much as he could. It was ugly, and saying, 'oooh she wouldn't mind' is no excuse.
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Blue Eyed lady:
“BIB she didn't half, therefore Austin calling her it will have whooshed right over her head, Janice Dickinson is not only as mad as a box of frogs, she's as hard as nails & I'm sure Austin (much as I loathe the c word) calling her that will have been water of a duck's back.
Agree with rest of your post.”

cheers Blue -
Did any of the Brits use the C word, I can't remember, - the Americans seem to use it with such ease, it was bit disturbing !
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“He didn't want it to though. He wanted to insult and hurt her as much as he could. It was ugly, and saying, 'oooh she wouldn't mind' is no excuse.”

They all said Janice was bit bonkers, and a nightmare to live with, (except Chloe-Jasmine), she wound Austin up I think, and no excuse, it's a terrible word ,just the worst, but the Americans seem to use it a lot. Janice did come across as very manipulative and seasoned at reality tv shows. Austin did apologise to her though, but they were as bad as eachother for bad language and slinging insults.
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by amelie74:
“I'm delighted Austin finished in the top two. James was my clear favourite until last week when he 'saved Janice' then subsequently nominated Austin. I really believe this was done deliberately to trigger an Austin outburst and lose him some votes. I think James saw Austin as his main competition after the top 4 were announced last week.
I still like James, he played a good game but I think Austin may have edged it without James calculated (imo) move..”

I agree- and I thought James was very manipulative and remember,he was on the Apprentice afterall,- he's smart and a forward thinker, I think he was bit of a schemer and knew how to push Austin's buttons, and as you say, he had an idea how to get a negative reaction from Austin which would show Austin in a bad light - he knew Austin was his competition.

I think Austin will be disappointed, as I think James will drop him as a mate, as his use to him is over. Not until after they've done the mags together wearing speedos, of course !
Blue Eyed lady
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“He didn't want it to though. He wanted to insult and hurt her as much as he could. It was ugly, and saying, 'oooh she wouldn't mind' is no excuse.”

I disagree. He lost his temper & said some terrible things. When you're as angry as Austin was, I would imagine he wouldn't have been capable of planning on how to hurt her. He simply lost the plot, apologised & everyone accepted it.
I genuinely don't see the big issue. Different if he said it repeatedly to everyone.

Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“cheers Blue -
Did any of the Brits use the C word, I can't remember, - the Americans seem to use it with such ease, it was bit disturbing !”

Not that I remember.
Yes the Americans in the House had no problem letting the c word roll off their tongues.
Blue Eyed lady
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“They all said Janice was bit bonkers, and a nightmare to live with, (except Chloe-Jasmine), she wound Austin up I think, and no excuse, it's a terrible word ,just the worst, but the Americans seem to use it a lot. Janice did come across as very manipulative and seasoned at reality tv shows. Austin did apologise to her though, but they were as bad as eachother for bad language and slinging insults.”

And the thing is, they're probably having a good old laugh about it now
rolergirl
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“cheers Blue -
Did any of the Brits use the C word, I can't remember, - the Americans seem to use it with such ease, it was bit disturbing !”

chris did with the famous "im going to chin the next americant **** i see"
Blue Eyed lady
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by amelie74:
“I'm delighted Austin finished in the top two. James was my clear favourite until last week when he 'saved Janice' then subsequently nominated Austin. I really believe this was done deliberately to trigger an Austin outburst and lose him some votes. I think James saw Austin as his main competition after the top 4 were announced last week.
I still like James, he played a good game but I think Austin may have edged it without James calculated (imo) move..”

Just read your post & agree re James plotting to gain himself votes & lose Austin a few along the way. He played a good game so fair play but I didn't like him from day one & my feelings never changed.

Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“chris did with the famous "im going to chin the next americant **** i see"”

Forgot about Chris saying it but you could see him cringe when it was played back to him in an interview.
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by rolergirl:
“chris did with the famous "im going to chin the next americant **** i see"”

Ah, yes he did
I forgot about that- that was bit of a shocker !
foul, and probably got the dull bloke evicted.
Pro_Sniper
25-09-2015
Both the winner and runner up were a joke. But that's just standard for Big Brother. Tolerance is unashamedly given towards violence and thuggery if one happens to be "funny" or a pretty boy. The place is a joke.
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Pro_Sniper:
“Both the winner and runner up were a joke. But that's just standard for Big Brother. Tolerance is unashamedly given towards violence and thuggery if one happens to be "funny" or a pretty boy. The place is a joke.”

James wasn't a thug or violent, and neither was Austin. The language he used wasn't unique either this year, I'd like to have heard BB give a warning to any HM using the C word, but that didn't happen sadly.
Blue Eyed lady
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Pro_Sniper:
“Both the winner and runner up were a joke. But that's just standard for Big Brother. Tolerance is unashamedly given towards violence and thuggery if one happens to be "funny" or a pretty boy. The place is a joke.”

Who was violent?

I don't vote as I don't care enough & I suspect a lot of people the same, so who wins isn't necessarily down to who the majority of the public think deserves to win, just those who vote.

If we'd got the chance to know Sherrie, Gail & possibly Daniel a bit better, I think on an entertainment level, along with Austin, these would have been my top 4, they all have a story to tell & I like to hear interesting conversations.
I think the producers are far too focused on rows, fights & animosity.
jack_blair
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Blue Eyed lady:
“Who was violent?

I don't vote as I don't care enough & I suspect a lot of people the same, so who wins isn't necessarily down to who the majority of the public think deserves to win, just those who vote.

If we'd got the chance to know Sherrie, Gail & possibly Daniel a bit better, I think on an entertainment level, along with Austin, these would have been my top 4, they all have a story to tell & I like to hear interesting conversations.
I think the producers are far too focused on rows, fights & animosity.”

I'd like to have seen Daniel stay a lot longer than he did, I think that was very unfortunate he went first, he was overlooked on final night too I thought, he must have felt like a spare part, he looked like he couldn't wait to leave. Sherrie was predictably boring, nice lady, but so boring, potted plant, - the show had to focus on James and Austin's conversations and antics , certainly after Farrah and Jenna left because any footage of the Brits that were left probably wasn't worth showing, embarrassing really.
Alrightmate
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by troy4783:
“After the way he spoke to Janice. I'm sorry but if that was a women and they spoke the way Austin spoke to Janice that night in the bedroom there's not a chance they would have been top 2 !”

A lot is made about Austin's use of that word, which he apologised profusely about.
But most people have either forgotten, or conveniently swept the fact under the carpet, that Janice had used that word against people in the house but never apologised for it.
blue_angel
25-09-2015
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“A lot is made about Austin's use of that word, which he apologised profusely about.
But most people have either forgotten, or conveniently swept the fact under the carpet, that Janice had used that word against people in the house but never apologised for it.”

I'd actually forgotten that she used it until they showed a clip last night (either the final or BOTS) of her saying it to Austin!

For me, bad profanity during a fight is never acceptable, but if we were going to crucify housemates on that basis alone, then we'd be kicking them out the house before they even unpacked their cases.

He had a bit of a meltdown, said some awful things, and very soon after apologised for them. It was very much like watching the last straw breaking the camel's back that day. He's never condoned his behaviour and language, just his reasoning behind why he lost his cool.
wildpark
26-09-2015
He is a contemptible human being, and those who are so keen to defend him are just as contemptible in my eyes. In some ways he was the worst of the Americans in that house, but because he cried, and did a poor me speech just before the end, people feel they got entertainment value out of him. He completed the dramatic arc and so earned his fee.

Janice is not a sympathetic character (none of them were) but anybody with eyes could she she was upset by his vicious bullying. She got paid and will tell herself that it is just a job, but you really have to be tone deaf not to notice the significance of her "I still have to work with Austin" speech. It meant she found the whole episode disturbing.

I cannot say I found it disturbing, it simply confirmed my misanthropy (I think humans are nasty stupid selfish animals as a rule - Channel Five producers certainly seem to work on that assumption) and so the fact that many people applaud Austin is no surprise. Your support for him tells me as much about you as CBB told me about him.
wildpark
26-09-2015
By the way, as is the way with these programmes the producers have picked a nice guy to front it. Rylan is leaning what a nasty business show business is; let us hope he is too stupid to notice how it is corrupting him. After all he has a mortgage to pay now (on that house he showed off onThrough the Keyhole) and he is doing what he always dreamed of doing - except in those dreams it was not as grubby.
mmpfb
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by wildpark:
“He is a contemptible human being, and those who are so keen to defend him are just as contemptible in my eyes. In some ways he was the worst of the Americans in that house, but because he cried, and did a poor me speech just before the end, people feel they got entertainment value out of him. He completed the dramatic arc and so earned his fee.

Janice is not a sympathetic character (none of them were) but anybody with eyes could she she was upset by his vicious bullying. She got paid and will tell herself that it is just a job, but you really have to be tone deaf not to notice the significance of her "I still have to work with Austin" speech. It meant she found the whole episode disturbing.

I cannot say I found it disturbing, it simply confirmed my misanthropy (I think humans are nasty stupid selfish animals as a rule - Channel Five producers certainly seem to work on that assumption) and so the fact that many people applaud Austin is no surprise. Your support for him tells me as much about you as CBB told me about him.”

I find those who have personality clashes with individuals, say terrible things and then show embarrassment and remorse significantly less contemptible than those who wish to cast sweeping and immovable judgements on huge swathes of people using the flimsiest and most suspect of qualifications.

Clearly you have a bee in your misanthropic bonnet about Austin but I'd look to the way you demonise so many others before you criticise him for momentarily demonising one.
wildpark
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“I find those who have personality clashes with individuals, say terrible things and then show embarrassment and remorse significantly less contemptible than those who wish to cast sweeping and immovable judgements on huge swathes of people using the flimsiest and most suspect of qualifications.

Clearly you have a bee in your misanthropic bonnet about Austin but I'd look to the way you demonise so many others before you criticise him for momentarily demonising one.”

How noble of you. Except he didn't show remorse, only self pity (which presumably you think is the same as contrition) giving himself blank cheques for further episodes of spite if (as will surely happen) he once again feels slighted, or frustrated, or has had a little too much to drink.

I do not have a bee in my bonnet about Austin, I see him for what he is; a narcissistic thug with the emotional maturity of a five year old. So brave of him to attack Chloe and Janice.

What a sorry excuse for a man.
Linaker99
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by wildpark:
“If he is your idea of an admirable human being the sooner an asteroid comes and wipes us all out the better.”

That's a real sense of proportion there. Someone says a few nasty things to a selfish, self absorbed and inconsiderate housemate and that leads to suggesting the destruction of the entire human race. It's a TV show. Not a dead 3 year old on a beach or pushing people off buildings because they are gay.
Rhumbatugger
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by Linaker99:
“That's a real sense of proportion there. Someone says a few nasty things to a selfish, self absorbed and inconsiderate housemate and that leads to suggesting the destruction of the entire human race. It's a TV show. Not a dead 3 year old on a beach or pushing people off buildings because they are gay.”

You may be right that some may be over egging it, but plenty, including you, are playing it down too far.

It wasn't 'a few things', it was many things, many times, and, from what Natasha said, and I see no reason for her to lie, Austin was shouting and railing at Janice and James for four days, not constantly perhaps, but a lot. And we SAW his aggressive hectoring, and the final verbal assault, which was ugly, not nothing, not 'a few words', not 'what she deserved'.

And he finally realised he was acting TERRIBLY, and that's what he admitted to, and understanding that is why he had the meltdown.

Now some think that the crying and talking about his brother and his mother etc. made them feel he did genuinely REGRET, acting like an ahole, but he acted like an ahole, thats' indisputable I'm afraid.

And some think that he just did some shtick he's been doing for years, be nasty, go on and on and on, have a confrontation or three and then break down and say sorry and they dont' believe him, or they think he's childish and self indulgent.

And some think that on balance, they believe him.

But that's up to them, we don't really know.

I like Austin, but think he's sort of 'arrested', and needs to work out his issues.

Because he did act very badly indeed, and he had reason to regret his behaviour.
yellowlabbie
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“A lot is made about Austin's use of that word, which he apologised profusely about.
But most people have either forgotten, or conveniently swept the fact under the carpet, that Janice had used that word against people in the house but never apologised for it.”

I didn't sweep it under the carpet, I remember it well, also the 'spitting' incident which I found disgusting and I said so on here but what Austin said to Janice wasn't just about the 'c' word, there was so much more.
blue_angel
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“I find those who have personality clashes with individuals, say terrible things and then show embarrassment and remorse significantly less contemptible than those who wish to cast sweeping and immovable judgements on huge swathes of people using the flimsiest and most suspect of qualifications.”

Absolutely this. He had an argument with someone and said some nasty things in the heat of the moment. This isn't some great crime. I think most people in some time in their life have had a falling out with someone. I can't say I've ever used the words that Austin used, but I've certainly said some mean things because I knew they would hurt the person I was arguing with. Afterwards I felt guilty and ashamed, because that wasn't me, I was just upset and the anger came out the wrong way. That's what I saw and related to with Austin. Yes, he lost it for a minute, but he was genuinely sorry and disgusted by his behaviour.
Rhumbatugger
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by blue_angel:
“Absolutely this. He had an argument with someone and said some nasty things in the heat of the moment. This isn't some great crime. I think most people in some time in their life have had a falling out with someone. I can't say I've ever used the words that Austin used, but I've certainly said some mean things because I knew they would hurt the person I was arguing with. Afterwards I felt guilty and ashamed, because that wasn't me, I was just upset and the anger came out the wrong way. That's what I saw and related to with Austin. Yes, he lost it for a minute, but he was genuinely sorry and disgusted by his behaviour.”

He 'didn't lose it for a minute', he spoke to other members of the house, as well as to Janice very aggressively and unpleasantly and he kept the Janice stuff up for a long time.

Saying he only 'lost it for a minute' just won't wash, that was just the WORST bit.

And he regretted ALL of it, not just the outburst.

Or at least I HOPE so, and I'm going to read it like that.
blue_angel
26-09-2015
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“He 'didn't lose it for a minute', he spoke to other members of the house, as well as to Janice very aggressively and unpleasantly and he kept the Janice stuff up for a long time.

Saying he only 'lost it for a minute' just won't wash, that was just the WORST bit.

And he regretted ALL of it, not just the outburst.”

He and Janice didn't get on since the beginning. They were both unpleasant to each other equally. The fights he had with other members of the house were all related to Janice for the most part.

It was definitely getting agitated through that whole few days. No one just blows up like that on one small thing, so when I say 'lost it for a minute' I'm talking about the part which everyone is referring to in terms of his behaviour; when he was in the bedroom with Janice and called her the C word etc. That's the part which most people who are criticizing his actions (as am I!) are referring to. I agree, he regretted anytime he was rude in the house, which is a lot more than most housemates you see.
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map