|
||||||||
Android the monopoly |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Android the monopoly
http://www.theverge.com/google/2015/...oid-a-monopoly
"A report from Bloomberg this morning suggests that US antitrust regulators are looking into whether Google has engaged in anticompetitive practices with its Android operating system. It seems a preposterous question to ask, but might Android constitute an actual monopoly?" "Without competitive app stores of their own, Sony, LG, Motorola, and all other Android phone makers in Europe and the US have no reasonable alternative but to accede to Google’s dictates, whatever they may be. They technically still have a choice — these companies are coming to Google rather than the other way around — but it’s only a choice between a potential Google-driven success and a certain, ignominious failure with any other OS." "There’s also a touch of irony in Google’s openness to doing business with other companies now exposing it to suspicions of anticompetitive behavior — Apple and Facebook are also enjoying dominant positions, but the fact they’re more stringently walled off and guarded actually works in their favor." "arguable that other tech giants, such as Apple and Amazon, are better subjects for antitrust investigations, but ....." |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 3,842
|
Amazon app store? Vimeo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West
Posts: 4,885
|
I can see why Google is in the firing line for this, none of he device makers have any control over the Android ecosystem, they either give into Googles demands or risk their handsets being denied access to the play store.
I still think Samsung will eventually fork Android and maybe work in partnership with Amazon or other such outfits. Cyanogenmod is gaining in popularity, maybe they will look that way. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Samsung have given up they were all on about developing a new OS called Tizen if I remember correctly that seems to have disappeared into the wind.
But I do kind of agree with the article Android is the cause of a lot of problems at moment with how it has been developed. How the ecosystem is for all that people say that iOS is closed android isn't much more open either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
I can see the logic behind it all, but it gets complicated in the states by the sales value share.
Plus the 'no entry' sign on the other big platform adds to weirdness. Talking of weirdness, Tizen is still meant to have Samsung and Intel as the main stakeholders, but with Tizen being a HLML 5 app type system, Intel have a catch 22, their big customer Apple freezing near any HTML advancement of their own. I guess Tizen as an IOT may be as far as it goes, but who knows. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
I can see the logic behind it all, but it gets complicated in the states by the sales value share.
Plus the 'no entry' sign on the other big platform adds to weirdness. Talking of weirdness, Tizen is still meant to have Samsung and Intel as the main stakeholders, but with Tizen being a HLML 5 app type system, Intel have a catch 22, their big customer Apple freezing near any HTML advancement of their own. I guess Tizen as an IOT may be as far as it goes, but who knows. http://readwrite.com/2014/10/02/html...os-8-wkwebview |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
There's nothing stopping anyone from making an app store of their own, or an OS of their own. It's just easier not to. Why create all that work for yourself when you can use a well established platform?
It's better for consumers too, it means that you can buy any Android phone no matter the brand, and not only will your contacts sync across but your app purchases and possibly even app states. We already know that fragmentation sucks, having multiple app stores across devices leads to a bad experience. You'll have apps in one store but not in another, they'll work in different ways and might carry different versions of the same app etc. Android is not a monopoly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
What the hell? you are either just trolling or lieing? On any other forum you would of been baned. Apple favour HTML 5. Does anyone know why such a liar is allowed to spread his poison so freely on this site?
http://readwrite.com/2014/10/02/html...os-8-wkwebview IOS has moved 4 points in HTML 5 compatibility, as near to frozen in time as you can get. Even I expected better. Anyway, the long rumour has it Intel and Samsung pulled the plug on Tizen for everything but IOT. Plus we know full well Google said Apple was vetoing any progress to webkit, so Google had to Fork. Now, I was quite cynical about Googles real motives but they are certainly being proved right. The beauty about HTML 5 is that top marks ensure web things work better cross platform, Edge now being one of the best for ' it just works'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
|
Please can we ban the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
Please can we ban the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
I put my real thoughts on the matter, it is not me who brought up that Tizen mystery.
I am quite correct on HTML, as I have always said there,you can argue other, if you want, One thing for sure, the web landscape is certainly changing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
How can it be a monopoly? It's got 1000 different interpretations and none of them work properly. iOS is a monopoly (maybe even an oligopoly?) and a damned good one at that. Which is why people buy into it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
Please can we ban the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
How can it be a monopoly? It's got 1000 different interpretations and none of them work properly. iOS is a monopoly (maybe even an oligopoly?) and a damned good one at that. Which is why people buy into it.
Android is the market leader, Android devices out sell iOS devices massively. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
I put my real thoughts on the matter, it is not me who brought up that Tizen mystery.
What is the Tizen mystery? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
I put my real thoughts on the matter, it is not me who brought up that Tizen mystery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
iOS is a monopoly if you buy a Apple product, If you buy one of the 15000 competitor devices created by one of the 3000 competitor manufactures in the same market as the 4 apple devices than you avoid the monopoly lol.
Android is the market leader, Android devices out sell iOS devices massively. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
Samsung have given up they were all on about developing a new OS called Tizen if I remember correctly that seems to have disappeared into the wind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,879
|
Quote:
There's nothing stopping anyone from making an app store of their own, or an OS of their own. It's just easier not to. Why create all that work for yourself when you can use a well established platform?
It's better for consumers too, it means that you can buy any Android phone no matter the brand, and not only will your contacts sync across but your app purchases and possibly even app states. We already know that fragmentation sucks, having multiple app stores across devices leads to a bad experience. You'll have apps in one store but not in another, they'll work in different ways and might carry different versions of the same app etc. Android is not a monopoly. Not really seeing how it's a monopoly when Samsung have changed Android almost beyond recognition on their phones and replaced Google apps with their own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
Read the thread thisguy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Ah, you want a news story with the actual word mystery on it, the enapace 'disappeared into the wind' will just not do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
Ah, you want a news story with the actual word mystery on it, the enapace 'disappeared into the wind' will just not do.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
|
The OP is wavejock, I'm calling it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
|
The next version of Chome is rumoured to have unskippable Youtube ads, ignoring plugins people have installed.
If that isn't antitrust and monopoly I don't know what is. It's google controlling the whole end to end experience to ensure their revenue and block other paid adblocks / work in their interests only. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
So you have no reasonable answer to a reasonable question?
The mystery is why Intel and Samsung seem to be pulling it. As long said/predicted by some Russian blogger, but that is immaterial. It is open for debate as to why. I was all for it, the HTML standard aspect being a very big positive. Just like the news story now happening about Google about to be pulled up in the USA for monopoly practices. Another small mystery for now. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55.



