|
||||||||
1 billion Android devices potentially infected with virus. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
1 billion Android devices potentially infected with virus.
It's seems after Android was just recovering from the first Stage Fright virus its sent reeling once again with the news a new more advanced Stage Fright 2 is now infecting Android.
http://m.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/news/...pqdRPWuGREEZyK |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
You really have a pathalogical hatred of Android.
1. Its not a virus. Its a bug. HUGE difference. Its a vulnerability, the sort of thing that appears on each version of iOS before Apple patch it. 2. As it isn't a virus, it isn't "infecting" anything. It is only an issue if you view/open a special crafted MP3 or MP4 file. Which won't happen on a legit website. And further, this hasn't actually been exploited. Your spin is quite entertaining at times, but this is just silly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
No hatred, I was just browsing the DS tech news and saw the story, it was also me who posted the story about infected apps on the app Apple App Store.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
Your spin is quite entertaining at times, but this is just silly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
No hatred, I was just browsing the DS tech news and saw the story, it was also me who posted the story about infected apps on the app Apple App Store.
Using inaccurate phrases such as virus, reeling, infecting, when none of those are actually the case is ... scaremongering. These things will probably be exploited at some point, but it'll barely impact anyone. Strikes me as being similar to the Symbian viruses years back - potential was there, but it was never realised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
In that case, you're an aspiring Daily Mail headline writer.
Using inaccurate phrases such as virus, reeling, infecting, when none of those are actually the case is ... scaremongering. These things will probably be exploited at some point, but it'll barely impact anyone. Strikes me as being similar to the Symbian viruses years back - potential was there, but it was never realised. The advice given by some last time was just to switch off MMS. Maybe this time the advice is just don't play any MP3/MP4 files? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
|
Quote:
You really have a pathalogical hatred of Android.
1. Its not a virus. Its a bug. HUGE difference. Its a vulnerability, the sort of thing that appears on each version of iOS before Apple patch it. . Oh, and BTW he did say it was "potentially infected with a virus" - that is the definition of a vulnerability i.e. has the potential to be infected. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
What's the point here ? That there are a billion android units (wow - didn't realise there were that many) or that there is a vulnerability in android ?
If we had a thread every time there was a new windows virus (1.25 billion windows PC's allegedly) then it would be a very busy site. I strongly suspect that there will be many more vulnerabilities found in Android, iOS, windows, OSX. Sadly that's the way of the world - make some software and there is always someone out there who will want to break it. Windows was always the main target (due to volume of users increasing the impact) and it now looks like android is having the same appeal. 1 billion units is scary big !!!??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 598
|
The point is making people aware an if you follow the link the story contains information to help you ensure your device is clean.
Of course you seem to of missed that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
Of course every iPhone is potentially infected with serious malware. We just don't know about it yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
|
The great difference between a bug on iOS and Android is that iOS can be patched very quickly, sometimes even too quickly
OTOH Android bug can be patched quickly only on Nexus devices where Alphabet has a full control over source code, or it has to be a bug in a component that is updatable via Google Play. Everything else is close to impossible to patch, because of the open source nature of Android. Let's say Samsung wants to patch their devices. First they have to decide what versions to patch. More versions = more work = more money spent => they choose carefully and probably patch only their premium phones instead of going for the most used models to get more devices patched. Then they need to merge the source code of Alphabet bugfix into their own source code for each version they decided to patch, compile it, test it at least rudimentary, and beg carriers to prioritise it, if they still have a say, I do not know. And that's what every Android phone maker is supposed to do to patch the bug. That's something that's acceptable if you have a couple of phones with your OS on it. If you have a billion, it becomes inacceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,807
|
Quote:
Of course every iPhone is potentially infected with serious malware. We just don't know about it yet.
http://www.theguardian.com/technolog...k-on-app-store |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
So the sensational headline breaks down to:
A security firm has found an exploit (which is how they often make their money) Nobody has yet found any malware exploiting that flaw. To be exposed to this flaw you would have to be using unofficial sites for mp3/mp4 files ? .... And this gets translated to "1 billion android devices potentially infected with virus". I'm still really at the " 1 billion devices" ..... That's an awful lot
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
|
No, the doctored MP3/MP4 file can be sent to you via MMS or email. Android code goes and proactively reads metadata. That's when the malware is started. You do not even have to open anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
So the sensational headline breaks down to:
A security firm has found an exploit (which is how they often make their money) Nobody has yet found any malware exploiting that flaw. To be exposed to this flaw you would have to be using unofficial sites for mp3/mp4 files ? .... And this gets translated to "1 billion android devices potentially infected with virus". I'm still really at the " 1 billion devices" ..... That's an awful lot ![]() If they are getting the number from google then it will not include the multitude of Chinese devices that don't have official builds. So could be lower or higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I would take too much notice of the 1 billion. If they are counting the number sold, then it includes the 2 sitting in my desk doing nothing for the last 5 months.
If they are getting the number from google then it will not include the multitude of Chinese devices that don't have official builds. So could be lower or higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
And you seem to have an irrational hatred of Apple. You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that Apple is a walled garden and therefore you can't get access to the low level innards of the operating system, and then with the same breath say that IOS and Android are equally at risk. That is just plain illogical. They are two different philosophies, there are arguments in favour of both. You pays yer money and makes yer choice.
Oh, and BTW he did say it was "potentially infected with a virus" - that is the definition of a vulnerability i.e. has the potential to be infected. Most operatings systems have vulnerabilities. In fact, all mainstream Os's have vulnerabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
I would have expected PCs to still far outnumber smartphone. Just shows how far we have come in a relatively short time.
http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2...ne-and-the-sun http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2...4/mobile-first |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Malware is a different thing to a virus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
Malware is a different thing to a virus.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54.


OTOH Android bug can be patched quickly only on Nexus devices where Alphabet has a full control over source code, or it has to be a bug in a component that is updatable via Google Play. Everything else is close to impossible to patch, because of the open source nature of Android. Let's say Samsung wants to patch their devices. First they have to decide what versions to patch. More versions = more work = more money spent => they choose carefully and probably patch only their premium phones instead of going for the most used models to get more devices patched. Then they need to merge the source code of Alphabet bugfix into their own source code for each version they decided to patch, compile it, test it at least rudimentary, and beg carriers to prioritise it, if they still have a say, I do not know. And that's what every Android phone maker is supposed to do to patch the bug. That's something that's acceptable if you have a couple of phones with your OS on it. If you have a billion, it becomes inacceptable.