Originally Posted by natalian:
“Should the pro dancers not be appointed because they are good at what they do rather than because of their age/sex/sexuality/skin colour/whatever?
Oti has been hired because she is good at her job, as is self evident from the way she dances. By coincidence, she also happens to be black.”
Absolutely - but the dancers are not always hired because they are good at their job. Eg Anton is often cited as a poor Latin dancer - but has somehow managed to hold down his job. Jared anyone??
Another point - if the 15 best pros auditioning for a spot on Strictly were all from ethnic minorities, not all would be hired based on them being the best at what they do. Lesser dancers (of different colour) would be added to create more of a balance.
Finally, the OP never said Oti was hired because she is black as you imply. They were just commenting on a fact which, for whatever reason, cannot be denied - that she is the first black pro dancer on Strictly and how good that is to see at last. The same will happen if/when a lesbian or a Chinese or a physically-challenged pro is hired. It may not be right but neither you and I can do anything to stop it. And actually, why should we?