• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Jay and Aliona weren't THAT good...
<<
<
1 of 8
>>
>
WalfordFanatic
10-10-2015
Part of me thinks it was totally strategic putting Jay and Aliona on last. Is it purely coincidence they supposedly left the "best till' last"?

I wonder if he's the producers favourite? The studio went completely OTT.

Not saying he was bad because he was very very good, but not THAT good. Certainly not worthy of a 10, in week 3. In my opinion.

My faves in Movie Week: Kellie & Kevin, Daniel & Kristina, Anita & Gleb, and Helen & Aljaz.

Was it actually that good and worth a 10 so early in the series?
yorkshirelass2
10-10-2015
Actually, they WERE !!!!!!
joh1965
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“Part of me thinks it was totally strategic putting Jay and Aliona on last. Is it purely coincidence they supposedly left the "best till' last"?

I wonder if he's the producers favourite? The studio went completely OTT.

Not saying he was bad because he was very very good, but not THAT good. Certainly not worthy of a 10, in week 3. In my opinion.

My faves in Movie Week: Kellie & Kevin, Daniel & Kristina, Anita & Gleb, and Helen & Aljaz.

Was it actually that good and worth a 10 so early in the series?”

Yes it was and yes it was!
Mrs Spratt
10-10-2015
They were pretty damn good, to be honest
Littlegreen42
10-10-2015
This isn't simply because they got more points than Kellie, is it OP?

and yes he was that good!
walnut699
10-10-2015
As someone who does ballroom/Latin, I assure you it was amazing. Especially for week 3.

And they always save the headline acts till nearer the end, Peter both weeks on last/second last, Helen last week 2, Anita near then end weeks 2 and 3.

If they put all the good ones on at the start some people would switch off.
kittenkong42
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“
Was it actually that good and worth a 10 so early in the series?”

Yes, yes it was
hannah
10-10-2015
They were brilliant and fully deserved the mark he got
G_Joes
10-10-2015
Shush! Yes they were THAT good and were deserving of all those scores. I thought another ten was needed.
duckylucky
10-10-2015
Yes they were , absolutely brilliant ! Wow
CaroUK
10-10-2015
No - they weren't good.


They were absolutely effing brilliant!
Mint-Opinion
10-10-2015
I thought it was awesome. Great jive content but also reflected the feel of the film excellently.
LazySusan
10-10-2015
Again yes it was that good and yes it was worth a 10.
fredster
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“Part of me thinks it was totally strategic putting Jay and Aliona on last. Is it purely coincidence they supposedly left the "best till' last"?

I wonder if he's the producers favourite? The studio went completely OTT.

Not saying he was bad because he was very very good, but not THAT good. Certainly not worthy of a 10, in week 3. In my opinion.

My faves in Movie Week: Kellie & Kevin, Daniel & Kristina, Anita & Gleb, and Helen & Aljaz.

Was it actually that good and worth a 10 so early in the series?”

YES it was .
edy10
10-10-2015
Ha.... I was wondering when this thread would be made ...didnt take long
missfrankiecat
10-10-2015
If any dance was worth a 10 that was. Packed content, astonishing technique and great characterisation. He looked like a pro.
FM Lover
10-10-2015
It was a fantastic jive.

Should have got 38 points as I feel Darcy wanted to award a 10 but she felt she couldn't do it in week 3
Tommo781
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by yorkshirelass2:
“Actually, they WERE !!!!!!”

Originally Posted by joh1965:
“Yes it was and yes it was!”

Originally Posted by Mrs Spratt:
“They were pretty damn good, to be honest”

Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“This isn't simply because they got more points than Kellie, is it OP?

and yes he was that good!”

Originally Posted by kittenkong42:
“Yes, yes it was”

Originally Posted by hannah:
“They were brilliant and fully deserved the mark he got”

Originally Posted by G_Joes:
“Shush! Yes they were THAT good and were deserving of all those scores. I thought another ten was needed.”

Originally Posted by duckylucky:
“Yes they were , absolutely brilliant ! Wow”

Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“No - they weren't good.


They were absolutely effing brilliant!”

All the above, and the similar posts.

A M A Z I N G
shelleyj89
10-10-2015
No. They were THAT good. Absolutely brilliant Jive.
Judi_McCafferty
10-10-2015
You were obviously watching a different dance to the rest of us!
differentdrum
10-10-2015
Agree with the original poster.

The series ends in week 3, may as well just give him the trophy.
WalfordFanatic
10-10-2015
HAHAHAHA looks like I'm outnumbered on this one!!!

Not taking away from how good the dance was but they were going on like the sun shone out of Jay's arse!! Everyone stomping their feet and him looking like a deer lost in headlights ..

Fair play to him. He's obviously WANTED. Lol
sorrento
10-10-2015
It was FANTASTIC......
WalfordFanatic
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by differentdrum:
“Agree with the original poster.

The series ends in week 3, may as well just give him the trophy.”

THANK YOU. I really don't want this series to be ruined so early with a potentially very blatant favourite/winner.
shelleyj89
10-10-2015
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“THANK YOU. I really don't want this series to be ruined so early with a potentially very blatant favourite/winner.”

I'm struggling to see why Jay being this good will ruin the series?! He's not stopping the other contestants from dancing well and improving? I'm delighted that we get to watch someone as good as him every week.
<<
<
1 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map