Originally Posted by CornishDunk:
“Some of the comments on here are hilarious. The way most of you have judged someone's character and personality on the basis of three 2min dances, and a few short interviews and VT segments. So that's enough time for some of you to conclude that somehow she's "deluded" and to pick out other character flaws she might have.
Just a question, have any of you actually met or spent time in her company to find these things out? No...i thought not!!
She's NOT a natural dancer, so yes she has balance issues and all of the other 'faults' some of you lovingly point out. But is three weeks really enough time to develop such an accurate picture in your minds of what a person is really like?
She's learning to dance, has no previous experience and is thoroughly enjoying the opportunity to learn something completely new, and to pick up all of the elements that go with it. She has no performance experience, and anyone who knows her knows she has no musicality or natural rhythm but surely one of the points of the show is for contestants like Kirsty to be able to have the opportunity to learn and improve? A natural fact of life, whether it's academically or even in dance is that some people are faster learners and have more of a natural aptitude than others.
A little less of the judgmental comments and critique please. She's a good person, as to are the other contestants.”
Do you always answer your own questions? You accuse her detractors of uninformed opinions whilst implying that you know her personally. I'm sure she has family and friends who love her dearly but as you say she is not a natural dancer - so I'm afraid the surprise and expressions of displeasure when receiving her critiques and scores indicate - delusional!