|
||||||||
Is Len right to downmark on lack of content? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,197
|
Wasn't Bruno's critique of the dance and Giovanni's head shaking what set Len off in the first place? Although he probably would have said something similar but maybe he'd be more civil about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
If the professional dancer partner leaves out some moves, the judges have to assume they wouldn't have been able to do them at all and mark accordingly. Karen submitted more moves for judging and Jeremy was able to pick up marks for some attempt at them.
For two main reasons: a) It's unfair on those who do attempt the proper moves. It's essentially cheating to replace difficult dance steps with posturing or disco/pop moves, no matter how well performed. The pro's do it to disguise the fact their celeb struggled with the technique. I'd mark someone who tried and failed higher than someone who never (at least on the dance floor) tried at all. b) If the content is lacking, for the reasons above, it encourages other pros to do the same with their dances. You'd be stupid to show up your celebs weaknesses! This would possibly lead to total dilution of the dance styles, where a e.g. salsa and cha-cha are indistinguishable, which would be bad for the show and bad for showcasing those dance styles to the general public. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 163
|
Lets face it, if there was never any control on content, all the pros would be choreographing routines that were entirely lifts!
It seems to me that some of them try to get away with as little conventional content as possible. I understand that the pros get pretty bored with all the rules during competitions and are dying to do some sexier cooler less conventional stuff. Remember Gleb and Anitas tango the week before. Gleb said something about it being a tango unlike one people had ever seen. But if I remember correctly some of the judges wanted it to look more like a tango. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,198
|
Of course marks should be lost for lack of content.
The problems with constantly trying to 'change' or 'innovate', all the time are that: The pros do it to add flash and hide a dancer's weaknesses. The dances end up NOT looking like 'better' ballroom and Latin, but just 'all the same'. If they are supposed to be dancing a particular dance, then flamin' DO IT, and if you don't and there's no penalty, what's to stop the pros doing what ever sort of subgenre mashup load of wafty with sassy throws and lifts with poses chucked in, that they flamin' want? It's already a long way to nearly there though, which irks me rather. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,256
|
A person who in a Maths test does very little Maths and then starts drawing pictures of Venice because they think it needs beautifying should receive fewer marks than the person who attempts to do more Maths, next time they will learn to do the Maths they were asked to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,524
|
Quote:
Of course marks should be lost for lack of content.
The problems with constantly trying to 'change' or 'innovate', all the time are that: The pros do it to add flash and hide a dancer's weaknesses. The dances end up NOT looking like 'better' ballroom and Latin, but just 'all the same'. If they are supposed to be dancing a particular dance, then flamin' DO IT, and if you don't and there's no penalty, what's to stop the pros doing what ever sort of subgenre mashup load of wafty with sassy throws and lifts with poses chucked in, that they flamin' want? It's already a long way to nearly there though, which irks me rather. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,434
|
Quote:
Yes, Len is right to down mark in my opinion. Whilst it may seem harsh for the celeb concerned as it is the fault of the Pro, if the lack of content is not taken into consideration, it would be really unfair to all the other contestants who ARE trying to master the steps, groups and variations of their dance.
I couldn't agree more with all you say. If content was not taken into consideration, then anyone could just skip across the floor, play up to the audience and skip off again, to get marked! I actually think a lot of people might be surprised to know how much more difficult it is to learn (and to teach) authentic steps and technique than it is to do things like back bends, etc. The best you can say about the routine Giovanni put together for Georgia was that it was inspired by rumba; there were two (2!!!) authentic rumba steps, the rest was (as I've said in another thread) just crowd-pleasing flannel! Plus there was a complete lack of hip movement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,524
|
Quote:
Hi Jennifer
I couldn't agree more with all you say. If content was not taken into consideration, then anyone could just skip across the floor, play up to the audience and skip off again, to get marked! I actually think a lot of people might be surprised to know how much more difficult it is to learn (and to teach) authentic steps and technique than it is to do things like back bends, etc. The best you can say about the routine Giovanni put together for Georgia was that it was inspired by rumba; there were two (2!!!) authentic rumba steps, the rest was (as I've said in another thread) just crowd-pleasing flannel! Plus there was a complete lack of hip movement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 458
|
My take on it is that judges are judging the couples.
To progress, each couple needs to consist of a pro who's a good teacher, who choreographs to showcase the celeb's strengths and pushes them to do the best they can and a celeb who will put in the hours, memorise the routine and learn the finer points of technique and performance. No, it's not fair on a celeb if they are paired with a pro who won't or can't give them a dance that gives them a chance to shine, but the pro will get their fee regardless and presumably the pro win't be asked back or will be given a duffer next series. So in the end, it's impossible to separate the two. Even the best jockey can't win the Grand National on a three legged horse and the best driver can't win the Grand Prix if their car breaks down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,122
|
Is Len right to mark down the lack of content and contravening of ballroom rules - yep
does he do it consistently? nope either do it to all of the couples or none of the couples don't faff abaht |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
My take on it is that judges are judging the couples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, Surrey.
Posts: 13,811
|
Yes, of course content should be taken into consideration. To me, it should be more like skating where (I believe? ) they have a technical mark and another for artistic impression.
In strictly where they are doing different dances, something like the way they mark diving comes to mind. They multiply the score by the degree of difficulty. I'm not suggesting they do that for Strictly, but the difficulty of the content should be recognised..as it probably is if the judges are doing their jobs properly. I think we all want to see the pros pushing the boundaries and not just playing safe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,213
|
Quote:
Is Len right to mark down the lack of content and contravening of ballroom rules - yep
does he do it consistently? nope either do it to all of the couples or none of the couples don't faff abaht |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
I was thinking about this in the shower this morning and I concluded that you have to give some marks for content (amount/difficulty) to make sure harder dances done well are rewarded and thus allow a sensible distribution of marks.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,524
|
Quote:
Or have set steps that they mark for each dance. Of course, that might make the dances a bit too much like what they are supposed to be
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,767
|
Yes, Len is right to penalise lack of content.
Otherwise safe, low-content dances would become the way to win SCD. Which might even suit the people who think a 10 means no mistakes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,586
|
Agree with ^^^
Why bother having different dances if 'anything goes'? |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,451
|
What is a Rhumba without content ? A woman being dragged about and cocking her leg up.
Len was justified, other dances are probably easier to hide a lack of content. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,055
|
Yes - I learn a lot from Len. I quite like the balance of judges. A few times I have occasion to quibble but not too many times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 8,256
|
Yes he's right to downmark for lack of content but he's sadly inconsistent about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
|
The judges can only mark what they see. Len is a bit of a dance purist, and likes to see proper content. Personally I agree with this. How is a rhumba a rhumba when there's more posturing and posing then there are recognisable rhumba steps. I can't stand dances where there's too many props, posing, messing about and not enough actual dancing. Of course this partly depends on the ability of the contestant but they can only do what their pro gives them to do. However on Saturday Anton 'taking the blame' but really blaming Katie's dance limitations on his lack of dance content (What????) was a disgrace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Manchester Lindy
Posts: 945
|
Quote:
The judges are not judging the pros so the celebrities should not be marked down on dance content. I think the judges should be able to comment on a pros routine (good or bad) but those thoughts should not be reflected in the mark given.
That said I think it is a case of swings and roundabouts - sometimes it goes with you (Peter and Janette Week 1) and sometimes against (G&G Week 3). They can only mark on what they see in 90 secs. If that's a lot of standing about, it has to be a low mark. There is no other way to score it. |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
Strictly is a team game.
Granted the teams are the smallest possible size (2) but nevertheless both partners share in the triumphs and disasters and for one couple ultimately the victory. So yes, the score should go down if the technique is missing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,372
|
Each dance should be readily recognisable otherwise what's the point in describing in as a VW, AT, whatever? Points should be lost accordingly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55.




