is it me or do these lot seem to weakest of the past shows.
They dont look to great, but early days to tell
They dont look to great, but early days to tell
Are these the weakest looking Apprentices ever?
They seem to get dafter and weaker every year! Seems a long time since I took this show seriously, but it's moderately entertaining, so I still watch it.
This bunch seem both incompetent AND dull.
There's no personalities like Baggs and there's nobody who immediately stands out as a potential winner.
Early days though, hopefully it picks up.
There's no personalities like Baggs and there's nobody who immediately stands out as a potential winner.
Early days though, hopefully it picks up.
Interestingly, I think that there seem to be quite a few people to watch. This time last year, I can't recall anyone I was thinking could potentially win it, but it seems that we've seen quite a few strong contenders. Charleine, Richard and Ruth have already stood out, but there are other candidates that we haven't seen so much of that could prove to be dark horses - Joseph, Elle, Sam, David and Jennifer all potentially could show that they are really capable.
No better or worse than most previous years in my opinion. No complete clown has emerged yet, but isn't that a good thing ? It is supposed to be a couple of rungs of the ladder above things like BB.
Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“No complete clown has emerged yet”
“No complete clown has emerged yet”
Mr. "Is this an onion" says hello.
His little speech in the boardroom during the first episode about how his teammates were weak for not stepping forward as PM even though he didn't himself has to be one of the more useless, idiotic moments of the show I've seen thus far.
Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“No better or worse than most previous years in my opinion. No complete clown has emerged yet, but isn't that a good thing ? It is supposed to be a couple of rungs of the ladder above things like BB.”
“No better or worse than most previous years in my opinion. No complete clown has emerged yet, but isn't that a good thing ? It is supposed to be a couple of rungs of the ladder above things like BB.”
Mergim.
Early days but there's nobody standing out as an alpha male. The ex-military guy is just a self important bell end with a pole up his hoop.
There's no characters like Tre, Stuart Baggs (RIP) and the legend that was Paul Torrisi.
There's no characters like Tre, Stuart Baggs (RIP) and the legend that was Paul Torrisi.
Originally Posted by Tallywacker:
“Early days but there's nobody standing out as an alpha male. The ex-military guy is just a self important bell end with a pole up his hoop.
There's no characters like Tre, Stuart Baggs (RIP) and the legend that was Paul Torrisi.”
“Early days but there's nobody standing out as an alpha male. The ex-military guy is just a self important bell end with a pole up his hoop.
There's no characters like Tre, Stuart Baggs (RIP) and the legend that was Paul Torrisi.”
He's one of the typical Apprentice archetypes which appear in every series.
The ex-military person who's well organised but has no imagination, and for that reason is fired quite early on.
The names change every series, but it's exactly the same character. It's like Big Brother casting.
Also look out for the doctor and the accountant. Other traditional Apprentice archetypes.
Apart from Leah, Alan Sugar tends to not have much time for them either and they too often get eliminated because they aren't the type of person AS can imagine working with after the show.
