Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“Yes in that the result is the same. But the motivation is different.
I'm questioning the reasons for it given by pretty much everybody in this thread.
They're insisting that it's for personal reasons to favour Jenny, I'm suggesting that it may be for pragmatic reasons.
I'm not saying that I'm right, but I think it's possible that some may be jumping the gun and adding 2 + 2 and coming up with 5. Their reasoning may be influenced by their feelings about the chaser.
They could be right, absolutely, I wouldn't deny that intuition should sometimes be listened to, but I would suggest considering the reasoning that the show may care more about how much money they could potentially lose.”
In the end it is entirely up to the production team who they let on the show. if a really good quizzer auditions, they have the choice not to pick them for the show at all. If they do decide to let them on, they can make it more difficult for them to win by putting them with weak supporting team mates who will be unlikely to be of much help. Or they can put them up against the strongest Chaser on the roster. So there may be something in what you say. Ultimately the production team should be aiming for a good contest between team and Chaser. This is the problem with some of the recent Jenny shows - they haven't been good contests, because the teams were so poor. And it is the production team that puts the teams together - it's not as if there's twenty or thirty contestants waiting in a side room and they just pick four names out of a hat to decide the team for the next show. The Chase is not like Eggheads, where people apply to go on the show as a team, they apply as individuals. So if you are watching The Chase and you think "This looks like a strong team", remember it was the production team that put it together, knowing it was likely to be a strong team.
In the end I think it comes down to this - the Chasers, like the players they get on the show, are not all of the same ability. They are all very good quizzers, better than very good amateur pub quizzers, but there are still differences between them in standard. It would be unrealistic to expect that there weren't. It is like any professional sport. The player ranked number one in the world at say, tennis, is better than the player ranked 200, and will beat him almost every time. But the player ranked at 200 is still vastly superior to the average amateur tennis player.
If the production team want the Chasers to win roughly the same percentage of their games, (which I assume they do), then they pick the teams to face them accordingly.