Originally Posted by
GoCompareThis:
“Tom suggesting going for £1,000
”
Indeed - that's because he understands the mathematics. Mark acknowledged the advice as the best strategy. In fact, I wouldn't have been shocked if Tom had encouraged her to have a go at the £20000 instead.
£3000 is by far the worst choice
mathematically, as she's moving one step closer to the Chaser for a likely potential gain of £500-£1000 max. However, some people aren't interested in the mathematics just don't want to consider the lower offer for non-mathematical reasons, such as moral reasons or fear of embarrassment.
She earned the right to make her own choice on her own terms for her own reasons.
She was caught two short eventually, so she ended up taking home 0% of 42000, instead of 25% of 43000 [*] ... if she'd got one more question right or had got the cubit right or had happened to know anything about women's skiing or had got the car question right. TBF, I did think she was unlucky with her guess on the car question, as she was right that Chris Evans is famously a car fanatic.
[*] so, effectively, she gambled £10750 to win an extra £500 - which is clearly total lunacy. Now she wasn't to know the pot built by the others would be quite so big, but even if it was only £16000, that would have still been gambling £4000 to win an extra £500. Conversely, you could say that without a little help from Vinnie Jones, she nearly cost the rest of the team £10750 each (her extra step for being there was very nearly all the difference between winning and losing.