Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“I though Jade and her mate came across as nasty and spiteful towards Matthew and Paula.
They were absolutely horrid to those two all week, never missing an opportunity to put him down and get a dig in. even today, she made the asinine comment that Matthew was expecting to be judged on the quality of what he provided for breakfast not what he did actually provide! Err yes - that he did - and his pastries and stuff looked lovely and good quality. I'm sure e cooked breakfast would have been lovely too with free range and organic provisions had any of them chosen to take it, as presumably that would have been taken in the restaurant.
Why they chose to underpay £30 for what was undeniably a lovely en suite room, when those who had to use the shared facilies only underpaid by £10 specifically for the shared bathroom, is unbelievable - it was just petty and spiteful and totally unjustified.
Matthew came across as a well meaning bit of a wally, who provides value for money accommodation in an expensive area, and uses good quality freshly prepared food. Guests staying at his place are made aware of the shared facilities and extra charge for a cooked breakfast when booking - and as he says, they have plenty of customers. Unlike Jade and her sidekick, he never got nasty or personal, or put her down at every opportunity.
I'd rather stay in one of the Partridge's shared facilities rooms than at Jade's place because I thought that her attitude stank, and her place wasn't all that either. She's one of those who like dishing out nasty comments and being bloody rude under the guise of "plain speaking", and the way she had a go at Matthew for underpaying the first place because he didn't sleep well was totally uncalled for, and she was spooling for a fight with him all the way through the process!
I loved the way he neatly got her back by underpaying at the end - and at least his reasons for underpaying her were more valid than hers for underpaying him - and she didn't like a taste of her own medicine! She didn't like the criticism she got, but was more than happy to dish it out!
Whilst I thought the winners deserved it - the husband was nasty with what he said about the others as well, and was another one who couldn't take criticism!”
Agree 100% with all you've written & nicely summed up.
I do still watch it, but with more dread than I used to as the programme now seems to be more than ever focussed on the potential clash of personalities rather than an objective view of the B&B's.
I suppose it makes for good telly in the programme makers view, but it's a less than satisfactory advert for the hospitality trade in the UK & if this lot are anything to go by it's no wonder people choose to go abroad.
The pathetic over-scruitinisation of rooms did give me an idea though for a sister show called 'DNA In a Bed', where four sets of B&B owners compete to find out how squalid their place is using pubic hairs, dust and 'human waste' as evidence found in each others' establishments.
Judged by a newly elected Crime Commissioner, forensics and swabs are taken for investigation and the winners are the owners with the most amount of bacteria found in their B&B, the prize being a visit from Rentokil and a lifetime supply of Jeyes Fluid...
Probably no less daft than it's been lately...
I still have a whinge & watch it tho!