|
||||||||
Four in a Bed :: New Series (Part 4) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#4826 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 91,283
|
It didnt gel at breakfast, now that must be a £100 underpayment
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#4827 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,493
|
Travesty!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4828 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40,757
|
Thats harsh, £20 for a couple of hairs on a mattress?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4829 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,766
|
Joint 3rd. Ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4830 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40,757
|
Joint third is still last
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4831 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,766
|
I hope she chokes on the trophy the nasty bitch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4832 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sarf London
Posts: 13,295
|
We're all winners.
SHUT UP YOU HORRIBLE WOMAN! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4833 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,766
|
She should tattoo a permanent smile on her face like her eyebrows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4834 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Oh dear, it's so disappointing when the nasties win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4835 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 418
|
Well, I would stay at the Billys' place in a heartbeat, chaotic breakfast or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4836 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 983
|
I actually think its the right result overall,
The first couple were unrelentingly nasty and deserved to come last for that alone. If they had been nicer people then I would have liked them to come much higher up as their place was OK. Marie came second and I think that is a fair result Yvonne and co won. Although she did spend a lot of time looking for faults and some were quite petty at the end of the day she only charges £55 and for silly Billy to knock £8 off because he could not work out how to use the wi fi was ridiculous. It was for that alone that I wanted Yvonne to win although to be honest I think Yvonne would do better as a hotel inspector, there wouldn't be much that gets past her Billy and Billy. They have the best place and up until today it was the one I liked best and wanted to win. Alas for them they let themselves down on payment day and showed that they were just as much game players as the rest and got what they deserved for the ridiculous £8 underpayment (15%) for silly Billy's inability top use wi fi |
|
|
|
|
|
#4837 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
|
Quote:
Oh dear, it's so disappointing when the nasties win.
£9.50 for tomatoes and mushrooms she would have preferred to have more done! I just, there's no winning with that! It's a shame, the programme is really being ruined, all for a plaque. Also, there is so little time discussing feedback as there are so many flashbacks, which is now very annoying. All through the week too, too much catch up, you can now just watch Friday and know everything that happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4838 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
Seems that is the way it's going most weeks now. Especially as those ones have no shame in really under paying/marking to the point nobody else will, so a win by default as their huge under payment isn't included on their own go.
£9.50 for tomatoes and mushrooms she would have preferred to have more done! I just, there's no winning with that! It's a shame, the programme is really being ruined, all for a plaque. Also, there is so little time discussing feedback as there are so many flashbacks, which is now very annoying. All through the week too, too much catch up, you can now just watch Friday and know everything that happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4839 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
|
Quote:
I actually think its the right result overall,
The first couple were unrelentingly nasty and deserved to come last for that alone. If they had been nicer people then I would have liked them to come much higher up as their place was OK. Marie came second and I think that is a fair result Yvonne and co won. Although she did spend a lot of time looking for faults and some were quite petty at the end of the day she only charges £55 and for silly Billy to knock £8 off because he could not work out how to use the wi fi was ridiculous. It was for that alone that I wanted Yvonne to win although to be honest I think Yvonne would do better as a hotel inspector, there wouldn't be much that gets past her Billy and Billy. They have the best place and up until today it was the one I liked best and wanted to win. Alas for them they let themselves down on payment day and showed that they were just as much game players as the rest and got what they deserved for the ridiculous £8 underpayment (15%) for silly Billy's inability top use wi fi |
|
|
|
|
|
#4840 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,503
|
Quote:
She deducted £9.50 because her tomatoes were underdone. Jesus wept.
You could buy about 10 punnets of tomatoes for that! How much does she think a complete cooked breakfast, never mind just the tomatoes, is worth? Ludicrous. And cheeky coming from her whose eggs looked like a dog's dinner. The underpayments for the two Billys breakfast was nonsense too. Again, how much do they think it's really worth? I almost wish they wouldn't have the low-end B&B's on this show as it's so hard to justify any underpayments when the price is already so cheap. Maybe if they added up the scores out of 10 and used that to declare the winner it would be better? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4841 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 386
|
As far as I'm concerned the Billy's had the best B&B. And Yvonne, that's a no no blaming the guest for anything. They are your bread and butter and you should have mentioned that there was WiFi, not up to the guest to ask. Cheap B&Bs will always win in these situations. Marie felt she could only dock them £2.50 yet took £10 off Billy because he had a dearer establishment., IMHO. At the end of the day they all got fed what looked like a lovely breakfast and slept in a beautiful comfortable clean room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4842 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: pembrokeshire
Posts: 615
|
I would love to be a fly on the wall and see the normal paying customers refusing to pay the the charge because they found a hair on the bed or they didn't like the bread used for toast, or the colour of the bedspread etc....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4843 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
What an effing crock!
![]() I'm getting sick of the nastiest teefs with the cruddiest dives winning and the folk with the best gaffs who play fair losing out. Load of bollocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4844 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
I actually think its the right result overall,
The first couple were unrelentingly nasty and deserved to come last for that alone. If they had been nicer people then I would have liked them to come much higher up as their place was OK. Marie came second and I think that is a fair result Yvonne and co won. Although she did spend a lot of time looking for faults and some were quite petty at the end of the day she only charges £55 and for silly Billy to knock £8 off because he could not work out how to use the wi fi was ridiculous. It was for that alone that I wanted Yvonne to win although to be honest I think Yvonne would do better as a hotel inspector, there wouldn't be much that gets past her Billy and Billy. They have the best place and up until today it was the one I liked best and wanted to win. Alas for them they let themselves down on payment day and showed that they were just as much game players as the rest and got what they deserved for the ridiculous £8 underpayment (15%) for silly Billy's inability top use wi fi I think Marie overall was the fairest and deserved the win although I admit she did go slightly over the top on the first visit. However she only knocked £2.50 off for Yvonne for the one error. Billy and Billy became silly Billies when they seemed to be harshly underpaying everyone. It says a lot when not one paid the full amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4845 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
What an effing crock!
![]() I'm getting sick of the nastiest teefs with the cruddiest dives winning and the folk with the best gaffs who play fair losing out. Load of bollocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4846 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
As far as I'm concerned the Billy's had the best B&B. And Yvonne, that's a no no blaming the guest for anything. They are your bread and butter and you should have mentioned that there was WiFi, not up to the guest to ask. Cheap B&Bs will always win in these situations. Marie felt she could only dock them £2.50 yet took £10 off Billy because he had a dearer establishment., IMHO. At the end of the day they all got fed what looked like a lovely breakfast and slept in a beautiful comfortable clean room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4847 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
I know!
You could buy about 10 punnets of tomatoes for that! How much does she think a complete cooked breakfast, never mind just the tomatoes, is worth? Ludicrous. And cheeky coming from her whose eggs looked like a dog's dinner. The underpayments for the two Billys breakfast was nonsense too. Again, how much do they think it's really worth? I almost wish they wouldn't have the low-end B&B's on this show as it's so hard to justify any underpayments when the price is already so cheap. Maybe if they added up the scores out of 10 and used that to declare the winner it would be better? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4848 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
|
Quote:
Oh dear, it's so disappointing when the nasties win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4849 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
I actually think its the right result overall,
The first couple were unrelentingly nasty and deserved to come last for that alone. If they had been nicer people then I would have liked them to come much higher up as their place was OK. Marie came second and I think that is a fair result Yvonne and co won. Although she did spend a lot of time looking for faults and some were quite petty at the end of the day she only charges £55 and for silly Billy to knock £8 off because he could not work out how to use the wi fi was ridiculous. It was for that alone that I wanted Yvonne to win although to be honest I think Yvonne would do better as a hotel inspector, there wouldn't be much that gets past her Billy and Billy. They have the best place and up until today it was the one I liked best and wanted to win. Alas for them they let themselves down on payment day and showed that they were just as much game players as the rest and got what they deserved for the ridiculous £8 underpayment (15%) for silly Billy's inability top use wi fi She's lucky it was only an £8.00 underpayment for her minging little dump and horrid personality. If the Billies let themselves down, it was due to the breakfast fiasco IMO because there was a chef on the premises, so no excuse whatsoever for running 40+ minutes late. The dad's face when the son was making excuses about the breakfast during feedback time said it all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4850 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,263
|
Quote:
Thats harsh, £20 for a couple of hairs on a mattress?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09.




You could buy about 10 punnets of tomatoes for that! How much does she think a complete cooked breakfast, never mind just the tomatoes, is worth?
Ludicrous. 