Originally Posted by BlueEyedMrsP:
“I'm glad K&C didn't win, although they should have come last. She is absolutely out of her mind if she thinks a £120 room and a £70 room should provide the same 'extras' like shower cap, cotton balls, slippers, robe, etc.”
You do highlight a facet of 4iaB that I find 'interesting': the number of owners who appear to be capable of running a successful small business (in the main

) but they have no grasp
at all of the difference that some or all of the following can have on pricing and value:
- location (pub in Blackpool vs country house in small, best kept village)
- the building itself (semi- on a housing estate vs quiet town house in a spa town, say)
- the quality of the fixtures and fittings: chairs, dressing tables, mirrors - or no bedside table but a lamp
- the extras... robes, slippers, shampoo, conditioner, cake or biscuits, instant coffee vs a Nespresso (say), types of tea and infusions, fridges in rooms (which some people hate because they most make a noise) provision of a guest sitting room, tvs, etc.
Kate (accompanied by The List if nothing else) came over as somewhat spiteful, vengeful and, overall, not very bright. Just because she supplies something (clock radio

) doesn't mean it adds value to the package.
Not a very good week. But I wonder if a lot of good quality owners don't apply any more because they have (finally) caught on to the fact that there's no such thing as a free lunch and you have to be very smart to outwit the desire of the producers to create what they define as good telly.