• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
Four in a Bed :: New Series (Part 4)
<<
<
319 of 336
>>
>
roddydogs
02-12-2016
The old couple have "Won" no matter the result. Bet their booked solid.
Shrike
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by carriebaby:
“How come So did all the feedback form and put 0 as he didn't stay the night, well the other fella did, why couldn't he answer for himself not for someone who didn't stay?”

Kevin maybe didn't stay anyway - where the competitors are a non-couple one of them does sometimes have to be put up off site if the B&B doesn't have enough spare rooms. Even if Kevin was put up in the R Inn, it was So's room that was filmed for the room inspection so we've no idea about Kevin's. Also it may just be that Kevin agreed with So
ewoodie
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“You seem to have a bit of a downer on Vicky for some reason!
The exit is clearly very scripted - the first of the couple out walks past Kevin and shakes So's hand, the second out shakes Kevins hand. Of the three couples leaving on Monday the camera cuts away after the first shake except for Chris and Vicky where we see So raise his hand and she walks past. But is that Vicky being rude or doing as the director has told her?
And after So had spent the evening being a sexist pratt, could you really blame Vicky for not wanting to shake his hand? Would that not be validating his behaviour? After all she is the guest and so has no need to be professional to that extent.”

Why shouldn't I make comments about Vicky? It isn't all about slagging off So! It helps to get more of a sense of perspective as to what has gone on. She didn't have to hug and kiss him goodbye, just shake his hand. That would have been the professional and mature thing to do.

These things all contribute to what has gone this week. Although it has all been about So this week, Vicky and her boss have certainly made their contribution. There were insulting comments about So. Another b&ber commented on the atmosphere it created. When Vicky and her boss took their turn to dance the bhangri music it was so obvious they'd learned a routine. Really? The boss and his employee learned a routine? i'm not a fan of So but for the purposes of cause and effect there are other things which need to be pointed out !


Originally Posted by Shrike:
“Kevin maybe didn't stay anyway - where the competitors are a non-couple one of them does sometimes have to be put up off site if the B&B doesn't have enough spare rooms. Even if Kevin was put up in the R Inn, it was So's room that was filmed for the room inspection so we've no idea about Kevin's. Also it may just be that Kevin agreed with So”

Kevin is an employee. He does and says whatever keeps his boss happy. Apart from her arseness, Vicky does pretty much the same.

If Kevin was off site, maybe they just swapped rooms.

Tonight should be good. Although with all the recaps .....When X visited Y's etc. .........
Venetian
02-12-2016
Just watching yesterday's episode on Catch Up.
Did I hear right, his name is So Shaw?
Whatever his name is he's up there with the worst of the wannabees to appear on FIAB.
Am I allowed to call him a tosser? Oops I just did ..
EthelT
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Venetian:
“Just watching yesterday's episode on Catch Up.
Did I hear right, his name is So Shaw?
Whatever his name is he's up there with the worst of the wannabees to appear on FIAB.
Am I allowed to call him a tosser? Oops I just did .. ”

His name IS So Shaw and here he is, singing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEaU3oU-yjA

Not too shabby, really



Not so hot at pool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MpWrwP_dKo
Venetian
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by EthelT:
“His name IS So Shaw and here he is, singing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEaU3oU-yjA

Not too shabby, really



Not so hot at pool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MpWrwP_dKo ”

Ah thanks for that Ethel.
Not too shabby as you say, looks like he's working all the angles to big himself up, don't think his appearance on FIAB is gonna help him on the path to stardom though
anyonefortennis
02-12-2016
A cock up on the ceiling.
2shy2007
02-12-2016
This first place was filthy for £300 odd quid a night.
claremonts
02-12-2016
Still can't believe their prices.
Woodbine
02-12-2016
Big undercuts but for that price it's expected.
anyonefortennis
02-12-2016
He'd be out of business if he charged £250 a night? Yea right. So how come the other hotels on that street only charge £150 maximum a night and are still in business.
2shy2007
02-12-2016
I would have knocked off a hell of a lot more.
claremonts
02-12-2016
Ooh - fight fight fight!
anyonefortennis
02-12-2016
Looks like the Redstone will win.
yellowlabbie
02-12-2016
Do the B & B owners pay with their own money?
2shy2007
02-12-2016
This was my fave place, so full of character , and lovely owners.
claremonts
02-12-2016
Hope they don't change a thing at the farmhouse.
2shy2007
02-12-2016
It was NOT a urine stain, it was a mark from where the lid sits on the seat.
Venetian
02-12-2016
Lovely though it is I don't think Ursula's establishment merited a £20 overpayment. As far as I am concerned it was one big "up yours" from So to Kris and Vicky.
2shy2007
02-12-2016
They underpayed, the horrible gits, dont change it, the sink was stunning and very romantic.
anyonefortennis
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by 2shy2007:
“They underpayed, the horrible gits, dont change it, the sink was stunning and very romantic.”

Knocking £3 off for the sink is ridiculous.
2shy2007
02-12-2016
HATED this place a beautiful cinema turned into a horrible corporate function room.with bad carpet.
claremonts
02-12-2016
What a pathetic excuse for an underpayment.
Woodbine
02-12-2016
Only 3 pounds but it seem silly to under pay because of the sink in the bedroom, if everything is clean and the service was good then that's all I care about. Also for £60 it was good value for money.
yellowlabbie
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Venetian:
“Lovely though it is I don't think Ursula's establishment merited a £20 overpayment. As far as I am concerned it was one big "up yours" from So to Kris and Vicky.”

Oh yes, I agree with this. I can't bear So, he is awful.
<<
<
319 of 336
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map