Originally Posted by Hypnoali: “Eeek forgot about them. Yes they were a whole different level of odiousness ”
Yeah, these are horrible women, but their sheer nastiness and spite, I don't remember ever seeing anyone like them, both in different ways, both so, so vile!
So joint winners. One set have done their business proud. The other have potentially lost business through their game playing. No prizes for guessing which is which.
The fourth place couple have done their business no end of good.
Well that wasn't a surprise result, was it? Pathetic excuses for underpayments. And funnily it's the posher (for a better word) couples that got underpaid. Helen clearly didn't mind pee stains on the toilet, where as fibre fluff was underpayment worthy .
Originally Posted by stefthepest: “Well I agree with Helen she she says they came into the competition to be themselves they have shown themselves to be very horrible mean people with massive inferiority complex. Also when Helen said you had to take comments on the chin she wasn't like that over her tiff with Louise over her comments re spending a week with her.”
It is very difficult for Helen to take it on the chin, I mean which one shoukd she take it on?
I honestly don't think Helen and Emma think they've done wrong. I know Helen was very upset when she thought she was called common but to my mind I would rather be 'common as muck' but honest and kind. Both ladies had the sensitivity of a pregnant rhino.
Beck hall looked immaculate, obviously I can't tell if it smelt of dogs but none of he participants said it did. would the 2 couples who said they wouldn't stay anywhere that took dogs even have known it was dog friendly if hey hadn't been told?
They were making such a stupid fuss of it you would think that it was compulsory to take a dog to be able to stay there.
Does anyone remember a character called Grotbags from children's TV in the 80s? Apparently there were two characters in her show called Grumble and Lumpy. Just saying.....